749
submitted 1 month ago by Szewek@lemm.ee to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 96 points 1 month ago
[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fucking lol. I can't believe that shit's real and from Reuters of all places.

I couldn't find the graph on an original Reuters article (they must have gotten embarrassed and pulled it down lmao), but Business Insider still has it on their version of the article

(edit: and this is just time vs murders, not time vs gun deaths, a better statistic for this)

[-] AccountMaker@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago

I think the idea behind the graph was to make it look like blood flowing, but the execution was... not the best

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Would still make more sense if it was reversed lol

[-] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago
[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Look at the scale one the left.

(It’s upside down)

[-] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

I know :)

my reply was in disbelief.

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I didn’t.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

I thought at first the point was that murders had gone down because they were suddenly technically legal. The inverted scale thing is worse

[-] Ashen44@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago

there's actually no fucking way

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

I almost missed the scale on the left. Almost.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

that can't be real.... why would gun deaths go down after such a law is passed? I don't understand the world...

Edit: Oh I read the other comments. Yeah that scale is stupid.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago
[-] resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

"Never trust a statistic you didn't take yourself."

[-] Schneemann@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago

Should be 'fake' not 'take', right?

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

History Trivia: No one outside Germany knows that "Churchill-quote" because it was made up by Nazi propaganda.

[-] Schneemann@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

After a quick search I found lots of pages that attributed it to Churchill or Goebbels but apparently there is actually no record of one of them saying it.

[-] resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yep, that was a typo. Whoops

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

"Yes, the pronounced hammer coefficients as evidenced by these repeated indentations in the flattened curve..."

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 15 points 1 month ago

If you torture the data long enough, hey look at how low I got my p-value.

[-] 7empest@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Cull the outliers..... Not low enough

Transform the data.... Not low enough

Normalise the data... Not low enough

Alter the model by adding random effects... Not low enough.

The major factors showed a trend towards significance.... therefore our hypothesis was met.

Hello PhD

[-] doodimus@beehaw.org 8 points 1 month ago

Funny how beating a defenseless creature to death with a hammer was just seen as another everyday activity for your typical Saint.

[-] mo_lave@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago

phacking p-hacking

this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
749 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

15197 readers
1280 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS