46
submitted 1 month ago by Redditsux@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://metawire.eu/post/105790

If the tech entrepreneur is successful in his bid to build part of the controversial project, it could mean billions more in the pocket of the world’s richest man

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Redditsux@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

estimates by the independent Congressional Budget Office, which has estimated the project could take 20 years and cost $524 billion.

that's how much.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 month ago

Musk couldn't build a successful golden shower without government subsidies, that's for damn sure.

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Trying to suck on the welfare teat for 20 years.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Unpopular opinion, but some sort of anti-ICBM satellite network would be a fantastic thing for the world… as long as it’s jointly operated by a coalition of nations. It’s a problem when schoolyard bully USA is the only one who can repel a nuclear counterstrike.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

ion cannon network, that was the premise of cnc3 games.

[-] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And that's just an estimate. You know that there will be massive cost overruns.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

its only like what, 524bn, out of 800+billion of the defense budget just for 1 year.

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago

Welfare Queen!

[-] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

At this point I'd be genuinely surprised if Elon Musk could successfully build a Lego set.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I’m starting to just root for these depraved motherfuckers to burn this fucked up joke of a nation to the ground. At some point, a person can no longer feel invested in the clown show that is the American populace. It’s like those goddamn Pandas that are endangered but just refuse to breed and save their species. Americans have everything at their disposal and they just don’t care. Fuck us, we deserve the consequences for our own stupidity. Just go ahead and give all your money to these rich assholes. Just go ahead and burn your own children in their wars. Enjoy your plastic $100k cars and the untreated cancer your boss man won’t pay to treat. This is your fault, and mine too.

[-] nebulaone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

SpaceX? More like SpaceY.

Sorry.

[-] doug@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

I really can’t wait till he’s dead. That fucking face is so goddamn annoying.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Anything capable of taking down any ICBMs in flight could probably also be used as an offensive weapon.

Hey, Fermi, is this your filter?

[-] Zier@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

If we use the 'cybertruck' as a metric... the answer is FUCK NO!

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Whoops we bombed Chicago, Los Angeles, and Seattle! 😗🎶

[-] Zier@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Oh nooooo... Now do Texas!!

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It follows an executive order from Trump on January 27, in which he described a missile attack as the “most catastrophic threat facing the United States."

I can think of a worse one

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Oh please, let him. I'd love to see that one play out

Okay okay, this first version didn't launch any missiles and we lost new York to a huge mushroom cloud, but this next version will fix that, I promise!

this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
46 points (84.8% liked)

News

30964 readers
1453 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS