242
submitted 1 month ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/funny@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 151 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ofcourse you can breed aggression, its so absurd to claim that you cant.

[-] Photuris@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 month ago

We have bite statistics. Every year, pit bull and pit mixes far outnumber every other breed for human bite attacks, consistently, and always make up far more than half (to the tune of ~70%) of all total bites, by breed. Every single year.

Yet people ignore statistics and are eager to jump on the pibble defense train. “My little angel would never bite anyone!”

Maybe. But numbers don’t lie. Just stop breeding them. It’s cruel to people, and it’s cruel to the dogs themselves, that the breed continues to be perpetuated. Breed-specific behaviors are visceral and strong, whether you have a retriever, a pointer, a herder, or a throat mangler. The breed behavior can be invoked at any time, relatively easily.

[-] wraith@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago

A friend of my wife and I got a pit bull a couple months ago. She was going on and on about how sweet he is and how he would never hurt anyone. Last week, it mauled her roommate. Nearly took his hand off while he was changing into his work clothes. His career is likely over and she's still defending the dog.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 month ago

I think that dog is legally required to be put down no?

[-] wraith@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

I have no idea. I know the city animal control has it now. She is trying to get him released, though.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

I guess it depends on where you live yeah...
Lets hope it doesnt get to hurt anyone again.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And even with this personal evidence, you get defenders downvoting the story - not because it doesn't add to the discussion, buy because it doesn't suit their narrative.

I hope the roommate is able to find a good surgeon and get the help he needs, that sounds terrible if it could call for a career change.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

even with this personal evidence, you get defenders downvoting the story - not because it doesn't add to the discussion, buy because it doesn't suit their narrative.

Not really commenting on the claims made in this argument, but this is anecdotal evidence. Meaning that someone who claims all pitbulls are sweet and docile because of their personal experience is just as valid of an argument as someone saying all pitbulls are bad because of their personal experience.

I don't really care about pitbulls one way or the other, but I find it worrying that a lot of the times the debates against the breed follow similar argument structures to those utilized by racist pulling up FBI crime stats about black people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] daizelkrns@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

I understand the bite statistics but you have to keep in mind how those are reported too.

No one is reporting their neighbor's chihuahua taking a bite at their boot. Bites from smaller breeds mostly go unreported.

It does give a point as to why pit bulls and other large breeds are dangerous though. Whether they are more common or not, they certainly are far, far more serious when it happens.

Responsible ownership has always been an issue with pitbulls, as irresponsible people tend to adopt and breed them.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe. But numbers don’t lie

This is only said by people who've never actually taken a class about statistics.

Numbers may not lie, but they also don't make assertions. People suck at interpreting data and that fact is constantly utilized to mislead people.

I'm not saying this to defend pitbulls, just that bite statistics don't really tell us anything about innate aggression in dog breeds. Just like FBI statistics don't tell us about innate criminality in ethnicity.

Those bite statistics don't make any attempt to rule out misleading variables. It could be that pitt bull bites are reported more often because of the extent of harm they cause. It could be that people who gravitate towards breeds who are thought to be more aggressive are wanting and are training for aggression.

Statistics is hard, and can generally be used to shape opinions on just about anything.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

This massively differs per country. Pitbull bites are generally nastier than other bites so they're overreported. It's also partially the public image of pitbulls being nasty dogs that gets them reported more often.

Historically the "most dangerous breed" has changed quite a bit. For a while Great Danes were the worst, then it was Dogo Argentinis, Malinois, German Shepherd, Akitas, Labradors, Jack Russells, etc...

In France for example pitbulls only rank 12th for most bite incidents.

Research on it has been mixed, with studies focusing on nature finding that the breed matters surprisingly little when it comes to aggression. It seems more likely that there's a certain group of owners that handle their dogs irresponsibly, which tend to popularize specific breeds. This seems more likely because places that banned 'dangerous' breeds don't see a decrease in bite attacks; the owners of the dangerous breeds mostly get new dogs, which then just bite people again.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 62 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They literally did the opposite with foxes. Some guy kept breeding the nicest ones until he got a "breed" that wouldn't want to murder you on sight. I'm pretty sure levels of aggression absolutely are something innate in some animals.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

"Some guy"

Come on now, let's not buzzfeed our facts here!

Dmitry Belyayev is the guy, though work continued long after his death

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The program has been quite successful, although you still have a high-energy animal with a strong odor. I'd still like to have one, tho.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks for adding the credit where it's due!

I had just gotten to work and was browsing Lemmy before I had to actually get started so I didn't spend the time to look up who actually did it lol

[-] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago
[-] glimse@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

A specific guy whose name is not a mystery

[-] Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

Russian silver fox im pretty sure

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Also he did it both ways. On population selected for nice behavior became dog like. One population selected for aggression. The second population goes insane when someone enters the room trying to attack through the cage door.

[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago

Exactly. I mean, dogs are wolves that were bred to be less aggressive and more suitable to be companions to human. Of course it can go the other way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Two things are true at once

(1) Upbringing has an enormous impact on agression in dogs. To the point it actually can be a stronger variable in the prediction than breed.

(2) Some breeds still have stronger tendencies towards agression.

But I agree with this sign’s main point. Banning pitbulls won’t stop the agressive dogs problem. Because the kind of people who usually buy pitbulls raise dogs to be agressive.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

The people buying them either raise them to be aggressive or don't even bother doing any work with them and wonder why people don't like pitbulls.

[-] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 49 points 1 month ago

I have a pitbull (American pitbull terrier) that is a rescue. He loves people, but is so aggressive towards other animals that I can hardly believe it.

After having one for years now, I believe there should be some sort of training or licensing requirement before someone can own one. The combination of innate aggression and power is truly dangerous

I can never walk my dog off-leash, I can never hand my dog to someone inexperienced. I love my dog, but responsible ownership is much more burdensome than any other dog I've had.

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago

Yep, adopted a pit bull several years back and had to re-home it after it attacked my border collie twice and if I wasn't nearby he would have killed her.

Got him as a puppy, raised him the exact same way we did the collie. He would just...snap randomly and go into attack mode. I also couldn't believe it. He was great with people though. Other pets and animals was a totally different story.

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Sadly the remaining 95% owners of pitbulls "love them so much" they'd start literal riots if that becomes law. Because you know they wouldn't be able to pass the training, or even sit through it.

[-] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago

I don't think they would riot, they would probably just get pitbulls from breeders that didn't check for licenses.

But I agree with the gist, there are a lot of bad dog parents, and people get pitbulls for bad reasons. I want there to be an avenue to punish owners & breeders who do not take proper precautions.

[-] knowthyself@lemmy.wtf 7 points 1 month ago

I can totally confirm with my own experience with our rescue pit as well. He’s a good dog in the house and with our family, but he’s triggered so easily when out in our fenced yard by any other dogs out for a walk. Years ago we made so many attempts to acclimate him to other dogs through training, etc. and nothing worked. We can’t even walk him on a leash because he pulls so hard and chokes himself no matter what we do. But he’s happy to be a house/yard dog and feel like we’ve given him a good life.

[-] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 33 points 1 month ago

Fuck pitbulls. There, I said it.

[-] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

What has Mr. Worldwide done to you to deserve such disrespect?

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago
[-] raltoid@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Meanwhile, dog breeders over the last century or two:

No, no, no. We specifically bred them with high levels of agression so they'd be more vicious and willing to fighting eachother.

[-] fujiwood@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Aggression is bred. I don't see this as funny.

Aggression is not bred

Our Pomeranian Mix: "I would violently murder all of you in your sleep if only I had thumbs."

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago

As someone who has raised and fostered dozens of dogs over the years, actual Pitbull breeds DO tend to have problems with aggression. I had one Pit rescue that absolutely loved people, dogs, and cats, and for a couple of years, it was one of the best dogs I had taken in. Until one day he wasn't, he snapped and almost killed another foster we had.

I have had about a dozen or so mixed bully breeds and breeds like American Bulldogs, and not a single one ever gave me a moments hesitation. There absolutely is something in the full blood Pit breed that is an issue. I honestly believe we could breed aggression out of the breed, but it would more than likely just need to end up a bully mutt breed instead.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

Bullshit if dogs can be breed to do certain stuff they can be breed for aggression. Like pitbulls literally where. My dog herds never been trained or anything but instinctively does it.

And yes lots of small dogs are assholes because of their owners but if they attack nothing bad happens.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Yeah so this is wrong.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

"It can happen to ANY family by ANY breed of dog! 1"

They make it sound like bull dogs of all varieties - and other fighting dogs bred for many generations for aggressive traits - are just really unlucky, that they keep showing up at the top of the stats for child murder and mauling.

Only unlucky ones are the kids who have parents dumb enough to risk their lives with killer breeds in the house. I truly feel for them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Chihuahuas

Hmmm… have you seen their owners? Yeah, it’s the owners.

[-] Chookitypok@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Do you want to bait all the pitbull haters? Because that's how you bait all the pitbull haters.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

im pretty sure aggression is bred in for some dogs for thier purpose of being a gaurd dog, or something as bull baiting. also cats can be unpredictabally aggressive.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's literally why they're called bully breeds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
242 points (79.5% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7578 readers
29 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS