177
submitted 6 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 78 points 6 months ago

Are we sure Iran shot them down? Maybe the F-35s just did that.

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 35 points 6 months ago

The F-35s yearn for the mines

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 6 months ago

It is a Boeing after all...

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately not true, it's a Lockheed Martin.

On the bright side, the next generation of fighter is going to be a Boeing bloomer

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 6 months ago
[-] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

f-35 were designed to land anywhere.

so we can call it rapid unscheduled landing

or a lithobraking manoeuvre

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 72 points 6 months ago

I'd love it if this was true, but let's be a bit less credulous shall we? No photos, no evidence, no named quotes, no location.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 6 months ago

Should be taken with a grain of salt till more evidence surfaces, they are claiming they captured a pilot. If that's the case we'll probably see some solid evidence soon. Given that Yemen nearly shot one down, I don't think it's that much of a stretch.

[-] stink@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 6 months ago
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 6 months ago
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

seems like might be a generated image

[-] O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Haha that's fake as hell!

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 6 months ago

update, there are pics now

[-] Hermes@hexbear.net 24 points 6 months ago

These are fake, as mentioned elsewhere

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 6 months ago

ah, I guess we'll have to wait some more

[-] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago

Definitely fake, likely a generated image.

Compared to a real F-35 the geometry doesn't match up. If the wings and horizontal stabilizers broke off we would at the least see holes where they were supposed to be. The grass in the immediate vicinity would probably not be untouched like we see in the image. Lastly, AI struggles to differentiate between vehicle debris, building rubble, ashes, and clutter, so wreckage in those kinds of images tends to look like a mix of all of the above.

Im sure that Iran has the capability to down a vehicle of such a type, but I'm waiting for third-party confirmation before poppin bottles.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 months ago

yeah seems like I jumped the gun on that one

[-] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

I hope I didn't make you feel bad :(

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

nah, it's my bad for getting too excited

[-] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

I think we all are to some degree. There's a lot of shit going down and theres probably as much information warfare going on as there is actual warfare right now so I can't really blame you.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

For sure, and thanks for the kind words. :)

[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah, intact fuselage too. That doesn't happen.

[-] sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Iran has not officially released ANYTHING. Iran has confirmed hits on 3 F35 planes and 1 F16 plane, but ANY PICTURE YOU SEE IS FAKE. Russia's Sputnik has also reported one of those F35 hits.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Also, you know, the engine is still very much on.

(I do not want to make op feel bad either, def a nice analysis by Shaleesh too, the rear stabiliser is F22 shaped - but the engine, it's just so funny to me how it's the centrepiece of the pic, an image so unique and stand-outish it just triggers some situational/prop humour for me.)

[-] sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago

This is not a true picture. This is an older MiG.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Staines@hexbear.net 46 points 6 months ago

This is definitely not confirmed in any way yet.

[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 27 points 6 months ago
[-] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 26 points 6 months ago
[-] AFineWayToDie@hexbear.net 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not sure if this one is confirmed either but here's a photo:

EDIT: Probably fake

[-] Cimbazarov@hexbear.net 42 points 6 months ago

Saw on telegram they said this was fake

[-] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 42 points 6 months ago

This doesn't look like an f-35 at all to me. There is only one central tail rudder as opposed to two, as well as the side intakes look off. I'm not an expert on planes but this looks more like an f-16 to me.

[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

Wikipedia says they have F-15s (which have two engines and rudders), F-16s, and F-35s. Unless it's something else entirely, it's an F-16. Good catch!

[-] DickFuckarelli@hexbear.net 25 points 6 months ago

Whether or not this is real, the F-35 makes a great reef

[-] Aradino@hexbear.net 22 points 6 months ago

I think that the jet fuel and explosives and such might not be good for marine life

[-] DickFuckarelli@hexbear.net 12 points 6 months ago

Agreed. But I'd rather them be underwater than in the air.

[-] Aradino@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

What did marine life ever do to you

[-] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago

Won't the jet fuel just float?

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

I think jet fuel evaporates pretty quickly. Not great to drink or breathe in

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 23 points 6 months ago

unless an IDF troop is reading this in which case it has healing properties and you should breathe deeply when in the presence of jet fuel fumes

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago

don't breathe jet fuel

:sawgerrera-shining:

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago

or bees.. unless you're a billionaire

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

Not great to drink or breathe in

The fish when they realize that technically they do both:

side-eye-1

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 16 points 6 months ago

Jet fuel can't help seal and bream.

[-] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 14 points 6 months ago

Jet fuel can't melt seal breams

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 months ago

its too late at night to be reading things like this.. i just shook the whole bed laughing and woke the dog and my partner up

[-] Aradino@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah but it floats where the fish live

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 8 points 6 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
177 points (98.4% liked)

news

24510 readers
440 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS