137
submitted 1 month ago by SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

Billionaires are against Mamdani, eh? Something tells me he is the right guy for the job then.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Surely this billionaire Trump supporter cares about the interests of democratic voters

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

Surely, the billionaires have the common people’s best interests at heart, right?

Right?!?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 33 points 1 month ago

Billionaires are scared. That's a good sign ..

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

So they are ok with spending hundreds of millions of dollars, just not in any way that actually improves the city for the people that live in it?

It’s not about the money, it’s just misanthropy.

[-] e461h@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Exactly. The ‘public services’ he wants to save is bribery to avoid paying his fair share. This guy is offering a ‘powerful people’ club membership so he can avoid giving back to a society that enabled his mindblowing fortune. Our system has gotten so used to it he’s totally good with saying it all out loud as if he’s some sort of victim.

Society’s cancer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NeilBru@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"It's not to make sure that I have a lot; it's to make sure that I have a lot more than everyone else. Forever."

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 month ago

It's wild that they billionaires are openly just saying "whoops, we can't be letting the people elect someone good for them, here let's fix that".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AHamSandwich@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So kind of this guy to give Mamdani an incredible basis for an ad campaign.

Like, for real, does this rich fuck not understanding that the vast majority of the American populace wants to see more blue shells? Honestly, how could it be more clear? All Zohran has to do is something like:

There’s an old proverb that says you should judge a person by the enemies they’ve made. Well, I’ve made an enemy of the billionaire Bill Ackman, and he’s pledged a blank check to whoever runs against me. But, there’s good news: votes decide elections, not money. I’m not listening to the money. I’m listening to the voters. I’m listening to you. Let’s win this together.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah. Mr. Mangione would be the only person who I think of who could be competitive against Mamdani, on a campaign to "deny, defend, depose" corrupt billionaires and corporations from NYC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 16 points 1 month ago

I can beat him, money pleaseeeeeee

Mona Lisa from Parks and Recreation asking her father for money.

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As a potential independent candidate Cuomo didn't poll that bad if you don't consider that:

  • the 39% he got are the same as Mamdani, so it would be 50/50 at best
  • as a known quantity, this 39% are probably his ceiling
  • it still didn't factor Schumer effectively endorsing Mamdani on social media

Political players are in still in flux, but, for the right wing of the Democratic Party, moving against Mamdani is getting riskier and riskier by the day. Not only would they lose the "unity" argument to mobilize the left close to the midterms, but the risk of suffering an humiliating defeat is too great.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Lots of articles say that Ackman is a real bloodthirty piece of crap, a famously petty crybully, and a supremecist. So I can see why he'd be against Zohran Mamdani.

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/crybullyism-bill-ackman-ruling-class/ https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/bill-ackman-war-harvard-mit-dei-claudine-gay.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzkY3NA_ZkQ

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

Somebody more left-wing than Mamdani has the chance to do something hilarious

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

So the TV pundits are calling this "class warfare", right?

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ackman is also a part owner of X, and that platform will also definitely be a big part of an effort to defeat Mamdani.

Edit: a family member just asked me what I think of Mamdani wanting to put a tax on all hiring, saying he proposed a 35% tax on the salary of all new hires. I googled this, and the only results are on X. The fix is in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Hollowing out the tax-base? Of what? Billionaires who have turned tax evasion into a sports championship?

In most places in the world, tax is primarily paid by the working people, not by the rich.

Which obviously leaves them with to much money that they squander on anti-citizen political campaigns like this. When they have the money for bribery on that level, they have the money to pax taxes like everyone else.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy

Is that a promise? Look dude I'm already sold on him, you don't need to keep selling him

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

That is what they always claim, don't they? You can't tax the rich, they'll leave!!

Cool.

Where?

Where will they leave to? Europe? Good luck, taxes are way higher there (not enough , though) either way, you'll be gone from what made you rich in the first place. You're not going anywhere

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

So let me get this straight. Current tax law favors billionaires. He’s concerned that progressive policies will target taxing billionaires forcing a mass exodus of billionaires thereby undercutting the tax base. In other words they’re already not paying taxes but taxing them more will make them leave. Make it make sense.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

Guy kinda sounds like a douchebag

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Whenever I see anything like this I remember my days working for large American companies and how difficult it was, even as a senior engineer, to get spending approval for anything. Like, even a $20 replacement headset I had to keep resubmitting applications for for three weeks because the managers had a policy of rejecting every first request on the theory that if it was important enough to spend company money on, it was important enough to fill in the form twice.

The point being, these sorts of people do not hand out a single penny without running the numbers and realising that the cost of rigging an election multiplied by the probability of success, is still lower than what they'll financially gain from it going a certain way.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

You leaving NYC Ackman? Gonna take Wall St. with you?

Fuck off to Ireland, see if I care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] besselj@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

Billionaires should not exist.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

This won't cause the exodus of the wealthy. It will cause an exodus of the greedy.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

A billionaire just causally announcing that he can influence, finance and promote an election using his money in order to get what only interests themselves ... rather than in allowing democratic processes elect someone the people actually want and need.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

All that money spent against them when they could idk just stop being little shits and pay their fair share. With interest of course

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

wtf? Is this really the route they're going to take? I know, pay your fucking share of taxes and then there wouldn't be a "hollowing out."

[-] CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

If it's a choice between hollowing out the billionaire population or the middle class, I choose the billionaires.

[-] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

It's not like they were paying taxes to begin with.

[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

These guys were the first against the wall, come the revolution.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

This is the biggest endorsement Mamdani could get. I hope New Yorkers are paying attention.

Bill Ackman is evil and actively harming the NY and US economy. He wants people to become poorer year after year, until they can't spend on consumption anymore, and that will cripple the economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Always follow the money. Why are GOP and billionaires afraid and against this man who pledges to help the poor and struggling working class? Because they obviously have an interest in keeping the poor and struggling in the status quo conditions in which they live.

If helping the poor didn't hurt their bottom line, they wouldn't pay to keep it from happening.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

Damn, my hopes for Mamdani just got even higher. Low turnout under ordinary circumstances give high-enthusiasm candidates an advantage, by that enthusiastic base's relative size to the ordinarily voting electorate.

[-] match@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago

Gimme a hundred million dollars to lose to Mamdani. Sounds like a cushy gig.

[-] Fleur_@aussie.zone 8 points 1 month ago

This is just blatant corruption

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

System working as designed. You see, Russia and China are the real problem.

load more comments (1 replies)

What a crook.

Literally buying elected officials.

A true enemy of the people

[-] Pulsar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have no clue what Mamdani ideas for NYC are, but if this pile of crap is against him, that signals to me that Mamdani has principles. Bill Ackerman will only support candidates that he can corrupt.

[-] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Free daycare, free public transit, and city-owned grocery stores. Sounds like a dream to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Who owns the voting machines? Is the software audited? Are there tabulation servers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

by hollowing out its tax base

As if the wealthy pay taxes. GTFO with that BS.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Fake fucking news. Well all know the wealthy don't pay taxes.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
137 points (97.9% liked)

News

31302 readers
2018 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS