77

I'll start. pokemon. doesn't matter if the game's old or new I just can't get into how it plays. idk the gameplay just gets old to me pretty quickly, palworld is an upgrade in every way tbh

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

Souls games.

I really want to like them too, but they seemingly aren't compatible with how I play games. I need to be able to put a game down for a couple of weeks and not feel like I'm back at square one because the specific muscle memory for that game has gone.

Just kinda kills the fun when the game is effectively telling me to get good, when I don't actually have the amount of free time IRL necessary to do that.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

for me it feels like they don't respect me as an adult. i need to be able to pause and save games. sometimes i get phone calls. sometimes the power goes out. sometimes i spill my drink. but no, it's all just "get gud".

also i just can't handle the aesthetics .

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 3 points 2 weeks ago

Could you talk a little more about the aesthetics thing? I have no intention to pick a fight with you or tell you that your opinion is wrong, I'm just curious because I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that about them before

Also yes the no pausing thing is very frustrating

[-] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 2 weeks ago

everything is dark and gray and meaty and slimy and gory and bloody and disgusting and sad and lonely and unpersonal and depressing and hopeless and evil and hateful and murderous and dead and off and...

even screenshots fucking wreck my mental health.

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

There are some stunningly beautiful scenes too though. I get what you mean regardless, its a grimdark setting for sure.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. Heard so much about Elden Ring, and watched the kids play it, so I thought I'd give it a shot.

After about 45 minutes of wandering aimlessly and nearly as many deaths, I decided I wasn't having a good time.

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I finally had the Get Good moment where everything clicks recently, its very real. Now im on Nightreign like its crack.

Level your Vigor, people. Farm that little village with the soldiers and get a few levels into your health bar. And boom! Now you don't die bc you missed a dodge. There's good starting gear there too.

Once you "get it", suddenly Elden Ring becomes like the coolest DnD game ever from an old-school perspective. Honestly, its not much different from Zelda - if you can play that, you can play Elden Ring i think.

[-] sirimeow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The beauty of Elden ring is that you can explore without actually killing much. Eventually you'll find some cool weapons or smithing stones to upgrade your current weapon and some runes to get a couple of levels (putting points on vigor helps a lot early on)

And then the game starts feeling less rough.

But I can definitely understand why it's not for everyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)

The Witcher. I really want to like it. It seems like the kind of game I would love and I recognize that it’s an objectively well made game. However, I’ve bounced off it at least 4 times after getting 1-4 hours in.

[-] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Same actually, I got Witcher 3 as part of a console bundle and played it for a short period, not sure exactly how long but I got to the first of I'm sure many fights with a dragon. Found it really unintuitive, by the time I got frustrated enough to bother doing a web search I'd lost interest. Tried a couple of times after and just got the cbf's every time.

[-] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

If you're talking about bouncing of the first one, that's completely understandable. It is absolutely not an objectively well made game, and I will die on that hill. Witcher 2 does hold up well enough though, in my opinion, and is a much better place to start. Just watch a summary video of the first one and avoid a bunch of antiquated jank.

[-] bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I had to push very hard to get through the clunky controls but I do admit it was worth it eventually.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago

Same. I tried 3 times to get into Witcher 3. No success.

Doesn't matter, there's tons of other fun stuff out there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Graphy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Pokemon - having to watch animations and not being able to speed anything up killed my interest

Skyrim - tried a melee run recently and the combat feels like you’re whacking air

The legend of Zelda - played Tears and the story and puzzles were a bit too kid friendly

Doom - I really tried to like it but I felt like I didn’t get anything out of it. It doesn’t scratch that itch I get out of FromSoft’s Souls games where I want to learn a boss’s patterns and die to it a million times.

In general I don’t think I can do story games anymore

[-] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Couldn't agree more with Skyrim, Oblivion was the same when I tried that too I just can't stand it. Easily some of the most over rated games IMO.

Also agree with Zelda but I think the same about all of the Nintendo IPs, they are just boring and the fan base makes me dislike them even more!

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalism: I refuse to develop my sociopathy to the level required to participate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Monster Hunter. Probably tried like 4 of those games since Tri and people keep recommending them to me, saying the newest one will surely be the one to convince me. But I found them all to be a boring grind.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I have a friend who develops video games and has given some good recommendations who kept trying to convince me to play the series. I've dipped in a couple times and just walked away unimpressed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I can think of lots of series that I don't like, just because I'm not into the genre. I think that everyone has genres that they don't like.

I think a more-interesting question is about popular series that I don't like within a genre that I do like.

I didn't like Frostpunk, despite liking city-builders. Felt like the decisions were largely mechanical, didn't involve a lot of analysis and tweaking levers.

I didn't like Sudden Strike 4, despite liking lots of real time tactics games, like Close Combat. It felt really simplified.

I didn't like Pacific Drive, despite liking survival games. It has time limits, and I often dislike time limits in games.

I didn't like Outer Wilds, despite liking a lot of space games. Didn't like the cartoony style, the low-tech vibe, felt like it wasn't respectful of player time.

I didn't like Elden Ring, though I like a number of swords and sorcery games. Just felt simple, repetitive and uninteresting.

EDIT: A couple of honorable mentions that I don't hate, but which were disappointing:

Borderlands. The gunplay can be all right, and the flow of new guns and having to adapt to them is interesting. But every Borderlands game I play, the always-respawning enemies are a turnoff. Feels like the world is immutable. Also don't like the mindless farming of every container with glowing green dots. And for a combat-oriented game, it doesn't make me mix up my tactics much based on whatever I'm facing. While I finish the game, I always wind up feeling like I'm not having nearly as much fun as I should be having.

Choice of Games. I like text-based games, but a lot of games published by this company, even otherwise well-written ones, have adopted a convention of making one win by playing consistently to certain characteristics of a character, so one tries to just figure out at every choice what option will maximize that characteristic. That's extremely uninteresting gameplay, even if the story is nice and the text well-written. I feel like the same authors would have done better just writing choose-your-own-adventure type games if they weren't focused on the stats. I also really dislike the lack of an undo, to the point that I've put some work into a Choicescript-to-Sugarcube converter.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 8 points 2 weeks ago

D&D

I've been playing RPG for decades, but play D&D less than once a decade, and my impression goes form awful to not worth my money/time. When I was young and broke, having to buy a player manual + a GM guide + a monster manual when tons of RPG would fit in a single book (Yes I know, clan-books for let's say Vampire are also a money-pit), was out of my budget, then every-time I played D&D, feel like the story were not interesting as concept like alignment and some spells like detect lies would kill many interesting plot. Too which you had a lot of character optimisation often over the long-term (If you didn't take that feat a low level you cannot have the killer feat at high level), let alone the people mixing RPG and miniature games

Sure you can have some funs game with D&D and play it differently but there is so many other game out-there (and so few time) , that why would I even bother joining a D&D game rather than another,

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I was lucky that we just had friends that loved making them. So we wouldn't have books or such, and we just made our player cards on paper with knowledge of what can grow and when. Then the world's would grow crazy if we wanted them to, or not. Hell we had one game we played specifically when we were drunk. We would close the bar down, pick up a 12 pack a piece and cigarettes. Then we would sit out on the porch from 2am and play till sunrise every weekend, sometimes both Friday and Saturday night. In that game we'd note our cards on our phones so we'd remember and the DM would have us send them to him at the beginning and end of the night so he could reference/ make sure they weren't all fucked up before the next play session. It gave us crazy things to talk about at the bar; what we wish we did differently, what we would want do aim to do, where we might want to go, and that just all fed content to the DM and they would draw up ways to integrate possibilities for the next week or so. Even had a couple side characters so if someone else happened to be in town or wanted to join us we could auto scale the character by doing a quick percentage off of some of main characters current stats. 1 or 2 people spend 5 mins to bring the person up to speed with what their character story is and where/what is going on or maybe overall goals while another one of us just writes down their updated stats for them and sends it to them.

So we'd spend nothing on the game itself. We had a blast

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crampi@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

Final fantasy or any jrpg really

Soooooooo long and boring

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Name any sports title ( NHL, NFL, NBA, MBA, etcetera )that isn't a zany, over the top SuperTuxKart or Cartoon Network Racing style kart racer and I'm out.

Same goes for any PVP shooter games such as Call of Duty, TF2 Counter Strike, etcetera. Anymore I really find no interest in them because I don't feel like breaking things over some 6 month old who can squad wipe me, all while getting their diaper changed and slinging slurs my way.

[-] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

GTA. It just seems really boring to me, I dunno. A lot of shoot em up and not so much substance. To be honest I feel like that for a lot of open world games. It may be wide as an ocean but it's deep as a puddle. That's not ALWAYS bad but I generally would prefer a more linearly running game that's a lot deeper.

[-] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

The Bethesda (and related) RPGs. The core gameplay loop just feels so shallow in both, meaning most of your time is spent wandering with nothing meaningful to do, or in spammy, often janky combat. The parts that are interesting, the character builds and the lore, aren't super involved in most of the game. You spend so little time building characters, and most of the lore is in written logs and books.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

While I like Bethesda games quite a bit, I do agree on the in-game lorebook stuff. I can't see the appeal of the stuff. It's a collection of extremely short, in my opinion not-very-impressive stories. I just can't see someone sitting there and reading them and enjoying the things


if I'm going to read fantasy, I'd far rather spend the time on an actual novel. Yet I've seen people obsess online about how much they like the in-game lorebooks.

I've wondered before whether maybe people who are talking about how much they like them haven't gone out and read full-length fantasy books, and so they're getting a tiny taste of reading fantasy fiction and they like that, but it's the only fantasy that they've read.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RonnieB@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Assassin's creed. The movement and combat didn't feel satisfying to me at all

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Just about any multiplayer game. I generally don't like playing with randos (why would I want to listen to a 12 yo squeal in my ear that they fucked my mother in a pitch only dogs can hear?), and most of my friends don't play games I'm interested in.

[-] xep@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago

I've failed at getting into any Battle Royale, Survival, or Extraction type game so far.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Fortnite.

Just. No.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Assassin's Creed.

Love the historical gameplay. But I cannot stand being interrupted by the modern day parts. Even if they are small. They feel so disrespectful with my time that I've always been unable to play those games. I forced my way through AC2 but I have never replayed it, despite loving the actual gameplay, just for the modern day boredom.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Dark Souls and any of its copycats. Grinding a boss for hours on end just to learn it's patterns is not how I like to spend my free time. Aside from that: why is that whole genre so bleak? Apart from maybe "Another Crab's Treasure" they're all dark and gray/brown and unrelentingly depressing. Does the gameplay lend itself to that particular aesthetic? Or is everyone just copying Dark Souls that hard?

[-] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

That decayed aestethic is immemsely popular and it works fine in making you feel like a survivor.

That said, i like jolly things and grimdark stories, and I tend to like the bizarre. Maybe grimdark games lack the bizarre and the occasional bit of fun. I personally say this is the byprpduct of the success of a specific subgenre of games in the 2020's.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Final Fantasy. JRPGs just aren't my thing

[-] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I think I/we were too old to get into pokemon. I tried 3 games, and got bored about 4 fights in. I'm sure back when that was the peak of gaming, it was amazing. But now after modern games, turn based gameplay is just not for me too

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CaptainCancel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

RDR2. Played, but didn’t beat the first one. Some other game pulled me away from it. Tried the sequel and was disappointed by the gunplay.

[-] whelk@retrolemmy.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

I wanted so bad to enjoy this game, but I felt like it did not return the sentiment. The biggest challenge was trying to get Arthur to do what I actually wanted him to do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Pokemon, TCGs in general, Fallout, Darksouls and the related things

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nivenkos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sonic

God Of War

Dark Souls

Call Of Duty

Final Fantasy

[-] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Walking simulators
Something like outer wilds should be fine but i get easily annoyed from just running around
Even that i know that in some cases its very fast running around or something

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 weeks ago

that's not really a franchise. and outer wilds is most definitely not one.

have you tried What Remains of Edith Finch? pinnacle of the genre.

[-] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

All of them.

About 10 years ago, I was playing BioShock. It was fun, but I kept losing interest. Which was weird, because it was pretty much a game that was made for me - a pretty deep plot, a cool adventurous aesthetic, exploring and discovering different places on the map. I realized I was getting distracted thinking about all the other things I wanted to do - hanging out with my friends, figuring out how to talk to girls, studying so I could get good grades and a good job, learning all about things that interested me, going backpacking and rock climbing - and so I finished the game out of habit, and then set down the controller and didn't pick it back up for a while.

My last game was Red Dead Redemption, which I blasted through in a marathon play-through while spending a month crashing my sister's couch between semesters. My sleep schedule got all fucked, I ate like shit, and I felt like shit. Once I got to the end of the game, I packed up my XBox and put it in a box box. The next semester I sold it to get money to buy climbing gear.

Now I just do the Wordle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Any of the big popular RPG series. I got through Mass Effect 2 (it was on offer for a quid) but have no desire to go back, and I know that’s one of the more action-based games. I also played Witcher 3 up to Skellig but just can’t bring myself to finish it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
77 points (97.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33362 readers
561 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS