149
submitted 1 day ago by byzxor@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org

Valve have added a new rule to the Onboarding guide for game developers, noting that payment processors get a say in what stays on Steam.

Newly added rule is:

Content that may violate the rules and standards set forth by Steam’s payment processors and related card networks and banks, or internet network providers. In particular, certain kinds of adult only content.

Diff of the new terms https://github.com/SteamDatabase/SteamworksDocumentation/commit/fddd59b5395cc3c1c74574650dbf5784612d0521

:/ payment processors strike again (slippery slope etc)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] megopie@beehaw.org 74 points 1 day ago

I really don’t get why payment processors care. like, I really doubt it’s a morality thing for them, so where’s the financial incentive?

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 59 points 1 day ago

They are USAian. Owners are most likely conservative and Christian --> imposing their values on others through money. It's the rich people's way.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I doubt that it has anything to do with social preferences of anyone internal to payment processors. They won't care.

Putting pressure on payment processors is a useful way to put pressure on any commercial service. The commercial service may operate in another country, but it needs the payment processor, and the payment processors don't want to be ejected from countries. The payment processor can be a lever for laws passed elsewhere.

[-] megopie@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago

Every payment processor on steam is a publicly traded company, not privately owned. So it wouldn’t really be up to any one individual’s moral preference about such things. Personal preference would only count in to it if one of the shareholders had enough shares to push the board around, but the only one where I could see that being the case would be PayPal from people like Theil and Andreessen. Like they’re both jack wads for other beliefs, but I wouldn’t exactly call them bible thumpers.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago

I don't know how much truth there is to it, but one compelling reason I've heard is that adult content has a considerably higher chargeback rate than other content, making the risk much higher for payment processors. This makes sense - I could absolutely see some horny person buying some adult content, getting off to it, then doing a chargeback in their moment of introspection.

[-] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

But that's only using like 2 minutes of the 2 hour return window

[-] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Wouldn’t the cost land at valve? I guess not with a chargeback, but no way someone creates and account everytime they buy a porn game.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 19 points 1 day ago

The anti-porn religious lobby just destroyed the livelihoods of thousands of pornographers

Beyond Pornhub, the anti-porn lobby is calling for all credit card companies to stop taking payments from all porn sites. Jessie Sage, sex worker and co-founder of the Peepshow Podcast, and I discussed the effects of this crisis on laborers—a subject she unpacks with sex workers on her newest episode. Jessie told me, “I believe that this will have ripple effects on our industry that extend far beyond Pornhub. Mindgeek [Pornhub’s parent company] is the largest company in the industry, and if Visa/Mastercard is willing to pull its financial services from them, the smaller companies are not far behind.”

OnlyFans founder blames banks for ban on porn

Stokely also said UK-based Metro Bank had closed OnlyFans’ corporate account in 2019 with short notice and highlighted how many sex workers, including OnlyFans creators, were struggling to access basic financial services.

“JPMorgan Chase is particularly aggressive in closing accounts of sex workers or . . . any business that supports sex workers,” he said.

Why is OnlyFans letting financial companies lure it away from porn?

But the decision to remove OnlyFan’s most popular product was not a result of legal pressure, according to the company. The decision was made in order “to comply with the requests of our banking partners and payout providers,” an OnlyFans spokesperson wrote by email.

The change marks a growing trend where financial services firms such as credit card and payment processors effectively decide what content is allowed or prohibited on internet platforms. For creators who depend on internet platforms for their income, especially adult performers, the sudden change represents a cautionary tale as the gatekeepers of the creator economy take shape.

There's the reason. Anti-porn/religious groups will lobby payment providers and bans to stop payments being made to adult content creators. Is there problematic adult content on Steam? For sure. However, there is also problematic political content on Steam which seems not affect banks/payment providers interest.

We all should care cause adult content is the first to get censored. Then the censor bar will move to include other topics and more topics.

[-] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 32 points 1 day ago

This is such horse shit. I hate these puritanical CC companies

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago

I'm sure no one will miss those incest games, but letting payment processors decide what speech people are allowed to exchange is nuts. These are middlemen. They don't need to exist. I want more countries to hurry up and adopt GNU Taler and make all these middlemen superfluous.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 38 points 1 day ago

There goes Valve creating their own payment processor

[-] cryptTurtle@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

I would 100% be on board for the lifetime warranty of Gaben.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 day ago

If Steam or someone went to crypto just to kick the processors out, that might be one thing that would actually make me look at crypto with something other than derision.

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They'd never do that, as it would severely limit their userbase. Throwing out a couple games, especially when it's ultra-niche stuff like "futanari incest" games, is the much easier and more sensible move for Valve.

[-] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

Eww futanari incest? Get me back to shooting people in the head like a good christian.

[-] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago

That was originally one of the intended purposes of cryptocurrency, or at least claimed to be. Too bad we can't have anything without needing to make it an investment engine.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Government essentially guaranteed that by classifying it as such, e.g. SEC regulating crypto

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

Huh? Investment people definitely didn't wait for that classification to start turning it into a speculations market. The SEC actions were largely reactive.

My local bank's investment and wealth management bros were already all about crypto long before regulations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

They accepted BTC for a while but stopped. The other comment here mentioned the transaction fees being a problem for purchases on the scale of steam game prices, but it wasn't just that. A big problem was crypto volatility and transaction processing time. They found that very often by the time a transaction cleared the value had swung enough that they were getting amounts that failed to align with the actual prices of the games people were buying.

It's more stable now, so maybe that would be less of a problem, but I feel it highlights a big problem with crypto in general and that is that even when you do find places that accept crypto nothing is priced in crypto. It's basically always just a proxy for USD using whatever its current market value is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Crypto isn't necessary (or rather, blockchain isn't necessary). Check out GNU Taler. So far I believe only Swiss banks have adopted it.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 day ago

I spent ages buying games on steam with Bitcoin years ago. They dropped it when transaction fees got bigger than the game cost (I don't think they ever supported crypto other than Bitcoin, and that was through a specific payment processor that took the Bitcoin and gave Valve real money).

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Well yes, this was the original intent of crypto. Putting payment in the hands of the people. It's only been made terrible by tech bros and greed the same way the Internet has.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 40 points 1 day ago

I really hope the EU will step in to stop this, it's a despicable practice, and it makes me sad that Valve doesn't stand their ground. They're big enough that they should be able to exert pressure on Visa and MC, who seemingly push this forward the most.

[-] Goodeye8@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think you're seriously underestimating how big VISA and Mastercard are. Valve is estimated to be worth around 8 billion, Visa made 4.5 billion in profits Q2 of 2025. VISA makes more money annually than Valve is even worth. Furthermore if we exclude China, Visa and MC make up 90% of all online payments. Steam's entire business depends on online purchases. Steam would be thoroughly fucked if Visa and MC dropped Valve.

What Visa and MC are doing is despicable and something should be done about them, but Valve is not in a position to do anything but bend over and spread the cheeks.

The EU will sooner ban all adult games from Steam. Seriously, check out any porn game on steamdb.info and look for "restricted_countries" in the Metadata section. Notice a certain large EU country there?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 5 points 1 day ago

Couldn’t they just restrict these games to be purchased with steam wallet credit only? You can’t buy a porn game on a card, fine. But you can top up your account with €50. Afterwards, the payment processor is out of the equation.

[-] dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago

And twitter chatbot can do nsfw role play. I wonder why he doesn’t get pinged by payment processors.

[-] thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago

Oh look fascism ruining things yet. Again. Can't make steam stop doing certain things. Force it on them by giga corporations outside there control. Don't want no diversity anywhere.

[-] monogram@feddit.nl 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That’s why you should be buying those games from itch / Patreon/ SubscribeStar, banking on a single game store is a loosing game.

That is why EU has the DMA That is why a market is only healthy if you participate in it

E.g. when buying coffee (except for Starbucks) I’ll go to any café that sells it, if it looks too corporate or dirty I’ll go somewhere else.

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The problem with that is that all of these platforms also use the same big payment providers, meaning they're just as likely to be forced to remove these sorts of games.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

True. A number of Patreon folk had to go for SubscribeStar or elsewhere because they decided to ban several types of fetish

[-] l_b_i@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago

Patreon has similar restrictions. I'm not sure about itch. They all rely mostly on stripe for payments. Stripe gets to set a lot of terms, and switching platforms doesn't usually change that.

[-] monogram@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

I’ve noticed that enforcement becomes more of a thing the larger the platform

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

They will be next as all of those also use the CC companies.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago

We need GNU taler everywhere. Fuck these USAian payment processors.

[-] monogram@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

Wow GNU Taler is indeed the answer, it attempt to be a privacy friendly alternative to PayPal

It’s not yet another cryptocurrency, no blockchain 🎉 no mining 🎉 no surveillance for the purchaser!

https://www.taler.net/en/

[-] Kissaki@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Diff of the new terms

They add a <br> inside the <li>? wth

Messy layouting

[-] SirQuack@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

You never make a list that has an item with a hard break in it? They are everywhere.

[-] Kissaki@beehaw.org 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Why would I add a line break when I don't want or need a line break? It's a list item, not a text paragraph.

I define the layout and spacing in CSS for the li element.

I don't think I've ever noticed this as prevalent or common. If at all then as a strange outlier.

If it's a list item with line breaks, sure. But the linked diff adds it at the end of the li with no content following. And it does so on the previous li. Leading to a line diff on a to this unrelated item.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 6 points 1 day ago

Steam is banning porn games!? How will I get my Northernlion Reads Steam Porn Game Reviews content now?

[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago

He'd have to stop playing Umamasume for long enough to read steam porn game reviews

[-] Hello_there@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Workaround is easy to install nude patches

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
149 points (99.3% liked)

Gaming

32085 readers
193 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS