314
submitted 1 year ago by abobla@lemm.ee to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 232 points 1 year ago

We want teachers to be teaching and not having to waste time measuring a girl’s shirt or making a girl feel uncomfortable,” Shultz said.

Good because policing what girls wear stems from this fucked idea that boys have no sexual self control or responsibility for same and that women thus have to take responsibility for it via modesty.

So with those idiotic notions, rape victims get blamed for appearance, consent doesn't enter the conversation, rapey boys are "boys being boys", and similar awful shit.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

For added context, Shultz is the school board president here. The stunt didn’t change the vote and the new policy that was being protested is the same as other schools in the area that didn’t have any problems regarding dressing.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

For added context, Shultz is the school board president here.

Holy shit 😳 how did I miss that??

I'm glad his ridiculous antics failed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (100 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 201 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From the article:

As a dad, that’s very concerned about my children ....

I may disagree with it, but his kids aren't mine, so he, as the parent, he can prevent his daughters from owning that offending clothing.

...as well as everyone else’s kids in the district,

And here's where it goes off the rails. Why don't you keep your own parenting in your house instead of your neighbor's house, eh? Are you also going to decide what books other parent's kids read? How about what religious beliefs (if any) other parent's kids follow? None of that is your business. If other parents are okay with their kids dressing that way you shouldn't get a say on that.

[-] silentdon@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago

Sadly, there are plenty of people trying to dictate what other people's children read based on their own feelings

[-] AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago

They'll indoctrinate other people's children into their religion too, if they get the chance.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah my girlfriend’s kids get crap for being atheists from Christian classmates who were clearly taught to act that way by their parents

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Seraph@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago

Maybe focus on parenting your own child instead of everyone's.

Also does this guy have a humiliation fetish?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] stephfinitely@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago

Shouldn't the parents be watching what their kids wear if they are worried about? A basic dress code is all that is needed. Just like the board said its a waste of time to measure girls skirts. Maybe if we didn't taboo the body so much people wouldn't care what someone else is wearing.

[-] Enigma@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago

Hahahaha my parents “watched my clothing” so I either had extra clothes in my bag that I’d change into, or I’d wear them under a top layer of “approved” clothing and take it off later.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Parent, here. My kids wear whatever the hell they want, and because I'm not giving them any reason to rebel, they don't feel any urge to do that kind of thing.

And if they did for fun or something? I wouldn't give a shit.

[-] stephfinitely@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I agree I changed my clothes too sometimes in high school. But still a basic dress code would cover the more extreme outfit. But when it comes to a skirt being a slightly short I don't think its worth the school time to check.

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 20 points 1 year ago

Agreed. We all have bodies. Underwear is appropriate for shared spaces (most people dont want to sit on anyone else's ass juice) but aside from that this prudishness of the human form that many people have is silly to me.

Even if the dad DID walk around like that, I think that's his business. We should all be allowed to wear what we want (undies for sanitary reasons) and if something is offensive then people could just, you know, not look!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 111 points 1 year ago

“As a board we voted to ultimately let parents and families decide what is appropriate for them. It is the parents and family’s choice and as long as it doesn’t disrupt the school day, it would be a non-issue.”

I was not expecting this level of common sense from an Arizona school board. Good on them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago

I actually find myself siding with the board here, if only because I have heard all too often about dress codes being overly restrictive or overly enforced. Like the board said, they don't want teachers wasting time measuring a girl's shirt when they should be teaching.

[-] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

If only any of these parents cared about supporting teachers and their kids actually learning.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

also, none of the traumatic things that happened to me in my adolescence were based around the clothes any of us were wearing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Sometimes my daughter wants to go to school in something too revealing.

We tell her to change because we're her parents and that's called parenting. We don't need the school to tell her what to wear.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 30 points 1 year ago

Nobody's concerned with what their own children are wearing. They're concerned that they might be exposed to abdomen skin (the horror!) because of what someone else's child is wearing.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 44 points 1 year ago

His argument is that he looks like a fool dressed like that, so everyone who dresses like that looks like a fool? Weird thinking.

[-] McJonalds@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

his argument is the new dresscode would allow young girls to dress like that and he thinks the school should police it, instead of just raising his kids to be well adjusted and responsible. or it makes his pp hard and it makes it harder to hide that he's a pedo when he's in public

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The goal of people pushing agendas like this is the elimination of public education and state support for religious schools via “charter schools”. A lot of the people who run for school board who push parents rights are religious fundamentalists, real estate developers, or charter school consultants. This is at least true where I live.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Real big get back in the kitchen energy from this guy. He probably needs the kids more covered up because he can't control himself around too much exposed teenage girl skin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Oh, he's a never-nude too! I didn't see him at the convention last year in Berlin. There were literally dozens of us there. Dozens!

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

I hope someone called the police. Someone stole that poor man's ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Can't parents just talk to their children about how to dress?

I feel like that's a simpler solution and this way the school can focus on teaching.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

My wifes a teacher, they do have to spend an absolutely mind boggling amount of time covering shit that really should be handled at home. Literally calling parents about their kids refusing to do any work and the parent saying "I dont know what you want me to do"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

it's crazy that they're making a crop top and short shorts mandatory dress code for all students

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
314 points (92.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12374 readers
603 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS