1245
Teams (lemmy.ml)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world 146 points 4 days ago

Let’s not forget that all “return to office” mandates are really just a way for the C-suite to reduce headcount while appearing strong/decisive, avoiding negative press (and therefore spooking investors), and not having to pay severance.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a big fan of Teams. The fact that the software is named after a common organizational unit, and also a feature within the software is named after that same thing, is insane. Also, I haven’t seen such an unnecessary resource hog since the original Microsoft Edge.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's also a justification for the millions of dollars they already spent on office space that isn't necessary anymore.

[-] whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yep. And as another commenter pointed out, the “leaders” pushing these return to office mandates usually have substantial commercial real estate investments.

No conflict of interest there…

[-] GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 4 days ago

Wait till you hear about Word!

[-] Dultas@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cruel@programming.dev 17 points 4 days ago

I blame people more than Microsoft. People were either duped or too lazy to say "Microsoft Teams" in full. It's not too crazy to have services like "Apple Music" because people aren't allowing Apple to control the word by just saying "Music" casually. People need to go back to saying "Microsoft Teams." Alas, it will never happen. 😒

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 16 points 4 days ago

"Microsoft" is too many syllables to say every time, "Apple" isn't.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Also:

Gotta keep the commercial real estate market from imploding.

Whole lotta corpo money and financing tied up in that, sure would be a shame if most office space just wasn't actually needed for most office work.

Also also:

Most managers just personally need the ability to neg employees in-person, even if it is detrimental to actual output, that doesn't matter, what matters is sating their need to feel powerful and important.

Anyway, Zoom did basically the same thing either earlier this year or last year... yep, Zoom employees, the people who make and sell business oriented virtual collaboration software... all need to RTO.

Found it: https://fortune.com/2024/07/09/remote-work-outlook-zoom-return-to-office-chief-people-officer/

[-] whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, I totally forgot the real estate side of things.

I work for a midsize company that divides up their office space rental costs between divisions/departments. Our CEO also owns the commercial property management company, and he also owns the holding company that owns the building.

He’s been fighting me for a while now on my division’s “flex work” policy. Finally he gave up, but my division still pays our “fair share” of rent despite several of my team members moving out of state. Oh well.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah thats called you realizing your CEO is scamming the entire business and running it as a franchise that he somehow is both in charge of and also not fully legally / financially responsible for.

That reminds me of how a huge part of why SEARS went out of business was because they broke each building up into the floor space sections per department that each ran as their own mini psuedo businesses and effectively had to pay footage based rent to that building's GM...

As opposed to, you know, a business leveraging synergies, fostering teamwork and having a solid central leadership... nah, fuck all that, each SEARS location is now its own marketplace of competing fiefdoms, all the departments hate all the other departments, central command is now just Pontius Pilate washing his hands over all the bloodshed he oversees.

IMO that kind of set up should just be illegal, its fraud with extra steps.

[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 103 points 4 days ago

I don't know about you guys, but my company just mandated RTO a few months ago.

As expected, we now ~~spend~~ waste 8 hours: Commuting, Walking to and from meeting rooms, etc.

And the meetings, and the "collaboration", which are basically non stop all day long now, are just us talking round and round about all the things we need to do and how to do them for the 8th time, without actually doing them. But we sure LOOK really productive and busy. And I guess that's what management wants? Who knows.

With remote work I would do my job for 8+ hours per workday in pure focus mode. Knocking out solution after solution. You want XYZ to happen? Already done, here's a link to it. Have a meeting? Click join Teams call 1 minute early, listen and talk, while continuing to working on XYZ. You think we should try ABC for the XYZ project? Ok, I'll have it ready by tomorrow.

In office work is now spent walking from meeting to meeting, and you gotta leave 15 minutes before and it takes 15 minutes to get back and settled and you did not work on anything during. And they ask "so, how is project XYZ going?" "Good, good. Should be done in a few more weeks." And you maybe work on XYZ for 30 minutes uninterrupted that entire day, decide to skip any testing or QC, skip those extra features, skip checking with other teams if it will impact them, you have to skip all that to get it done on time. And it takes 3 weeks to do a 5 minute task. And it's inferior. And you talk about XYZ every meeting of every day, time after time, updates and statuses and comments on the ticket. And you finally announce you got XYZ completed and it's "yay good job" and management asks how the RTO is going and everyone is terrified to say "this is stupid and a gigantic waste of everyone's time and your money to put us in a giant expensive building just to not work on work, but to talk about working on work and we are getting only 10% done vs remote work". So we say "oh, fine" and management puts a little golden star on their report they made for themselves and they feel all warm and fuzzy that work is going great.

And thus, project XYZ was finally completed. A task that would have taken 1 person a few hours to do remotely, has now taken 8 people, 3 weeks of in office meetings and status updates and endless interruptions and discussions over every aspect of the project over and over again to finally complete. But we all LOOKED super busy doing it. And that's the important thing.

I'm personally, loving the RTO. I thought I would hate it, but I get to talk with friends all day and sit in meetings and daydream and the day flies by and I barely turned my brain on.

I'm happy to just do my job at home uninterrupted at my desk, but they sure don't seem to want that, so fine. Hope that works out.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 25 points 4 days ago

It's frustrating because management are so colossally, transparently, stupid but they get the big paychecks and the workers get fucked. And then like half the workers sit there going "Well this is just and fair. this is a good world. If the people actually doing the work had more of a say, that's communism and thus axiomatically bad"

[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 14 points 4 days ago

Rise up and take back the means of production!

We should steal ~~The Declaration of Independence~~ Microsoft Excel!

But yeah, execs have no idea what all daily work looks like, but because they siphon 99% of the profits that we creat away from us and no matter how wasteful or unproductive everyone is, enough gets done that they STILL make millions off of us. So they don't care. We all suffer and get paid JUST enough to not riot, but they make millions and millions just by virtue of being the executive or owner.

I wonder how well a company would actually do if it was fully owned by all workers evenly.

Imagine Microsoft if every employee had the same % share in profits. Wonder what that would look like? I bet middle managers would stop wasting money left and right. I bet pointless projects would stop. Anything you do to make the company more efficient or profitable is celebrated and you actually get a share in that profit.

I also wonder if it would simply fail due to people wanting to coast and not pull their share.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] psud@aussie.zone 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

During COVID my workplace had to go fully remote

IT has (left over from waterfall) some skills stronger in some states, so IT teams were reshuffled to get people from all over to balance them

So when we were allowed to return to the office, we were required to be there 3 days a week

With the spread out teams we had no in person meetings, we rarely saw team members even if they were on the same site

So we felt very much like the difference was to commute to do MS Teams meetings in the office on small screens three times a week, and have no commute and do MS Teams meetings on our own screens twice a week

We are lucky enough now to have full time work from home

Edit to add: management aren't on the same agreement as the rest of us, they have individual contracts. Very few of them have access to remote work

[-] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 10 points 3 days ago

OMG right!?

I didn't even mention it in my main post, but half my team is out of state and exempt from RTO.

So half of us commute into an overcrowded office and walk to a meeting room just to join a damn teams call. I hate being in person without a headset and having to yell at a room microphone and look at a smaller screen than I have at home.

Everything about it is inferior than what we had at home. It is harder to hear, harder to see, harder to communicate, takes longer to commute, longer to have to walk to meetings vs click join.

All the RTO seems like execs playing "everyone else is doing it, don't want to be left behind" or something.

Remote work just makes it crystal clear that competent people can do their jobs with nearly no management. It's perfectly natural for management to be opposed to it.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 days ago

Office Space. But also, Been in all those. It's weird to remember that your employer doesn't actually want you to be productive and fix the problems to be profitable. They want to appear to be doing that. You'll go further in your career by playing those games rather than working. I, unfortunately, like doing the work to keep the company going instead of the games, which is not as profitable for myself, but it keeps the company from dying even though they don't realize it, and keeps them rich. Win? I'd rather be planting corn at this point.

[-] punkhazard@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago

Man the "rather be planting corn at this point" is such a pandemic thought as well. I fantasize about working in a bookstore, buddies of mine think about owning a restaurant, driving public transport vehicles (2 people), repairing bikes, etc. One of my colleagues just actually did it, he quit his job and started to be a baker. Corporate scrum is killing us and all we want to do is work.

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

The absolutely critical difference between the work you, your buddies, and basically everyone else wants to do, versus corporate """work""", is that you want to do it because it'd make you happier and your community healthier, as opposed to making a line go up for some shareholders who honestly wouldn't care if you died tomorrow so long as it made the line go up a little further. Neoliberal Capitalism is Hell, man.

driving public transport vehicles

I retired (aka was laid off) from my job as a programmer, spent a few years converting a used school bus into a motorhome, and now I drive a real school bus. It's insane how much happier I am, even though I make about a sixth of what I used to make and even though middle-schoolers really do suck as human beings. Money is certainly not everything.

[-] richieadler@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago

I'd rather be planting corn at this point

I'll never understand this. I was born in a city. I never worked in a field. I hate physical exertion. Planting corn would be my definition of hell.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 19 hours ago

Sports are good for the mind and the body. You should try it

[-] renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago

you gotta leave 15 minutes before and it takes 15 minutes to get back and settled and you did not work on anything during.

I forgot about that. Also, where is Meeting Room X again? Is it upstairs, in the other building, or is it the weird one down the hall and two lefts two floors down?

[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

A task that would have taken 1 person a few hours to do remotely, has now taken 8 people, 3 weeks of in office meetings and status updates and endless interruptions and discussions over every aspect of the project over and over again to finally complete.

You're loving the RTO now, but then half a year later the management decides to fire dozens of people and replace them with this flashy new thing called AI, which gets the job done in 6 hours instead, even if buggy, and causing even more problems with unnoticed misinterpretations, but hey, 6 hours is so much less than 3 weeks, and we saved a lot of money!

And then the reduced staff will have to do even more work, get swamped, then gets replaced by AI (which still leads to inferior product), and by that point the management won't even consider RTO being the reason for all that inefficiency.

You could have done the job at home in 3-4 hours, but instead they shot themselves in the foot and still considered it a win.

Oh, and the office that they are renting and that is now half empty because of the reduced staff...? Suddenly it's not a problem like it was with remote working.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 79 points 4 days ago

Well they're not wrong; Teams is a godawful product and should never be used.

[-] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 29 points 4 days ago

If being proficient at using teams means people can work from where they prefer, it's my opinion that it's your duty to do it, so everyone has better choices.

Obviously that isn't the opinion held here, but that is more indicative of companies trying to reduce headcount because their growth has slowed. Growing companies are meeting people where they are. Broadly speaking of course.

[-] the_joeba@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago

I know a contractor working on teams. It was as eyerolling as you could expect.

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 40 points 4 days ago

Was it Teams or Teams (New) or Teams (School & Work) or Teams....

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 days ago

"Please sign out to sign in"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago

The only reason people use teams over slack is that it comes bundled with everything else Microsoft makes, why make a good product when you can leverage your position in the market

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tensorpudding@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago

Makes me laugh additionally because the modern conception of "dogfooding" in tech was popularized by Microsoft itself back in the 1990s. This is the opposite of dogfooding and really is a big condemnation of Teams as a software solution for connected work, at least on paper.

[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 days ago

Teams wasn't specifically built for remote work though. It was built for internal chat/messaging, document sharing, planning, etc. It is 100% used internally at MS even when people aren't working remotely.

I know because people at MS have been complaining about it since a few years before the pandemic.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] goatinspace@feddit.org 34 points 4 days ago
[-] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 4 days ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] AnotherPenguin@programming.dev 16 points 4 days ago

The real problem here is thinking Teams is the same as all remote work solutions

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
1245 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

26651 readers
1804 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS