58
submitted 1 month ago by Alaskaball@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PKMKII@hexbear.net 35 points 1 month ago

I got the most dreadful feeling when this story broke as my cousin works as a UPS pilot out of Louisville. Thankfully we were able to confirm quickly he wasn’t onboard.

[-] OptimusSubprime@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago

The McDonnell Douglas MD-11F is a freight transport aircraft manufactured originally by McDonnell Douglas and later by Boeing.

Boeing

Okay, that's all I needed to know. Never fly in anything owned by Boeing.

[-] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

If it's Boeing I ain't going.

[-] RaspberryTuba@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The McDonnell Douglas board pulled off a reverse takeover of Boeing and turned them into what they are now.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago

But seriously damn that sucks for the workers on board that flight.

[-] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

Cheney, dying: "Come on George, let's do one last one. Just for old times' sake."

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago
[-] musicpostingonly@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That plane is 32 years old. Is 32 old for a plane still in service? Were they flying something with increased risk of some failure despite regular maintenance due to its age?

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

For a military craft? Not at all, because they get infinite money thrown at depot maintenance, inspections, and so forth. There are B-52H bombers still being flown that rolled off the line (at Boeing, no less) in 1960. Russia is still flying Tu-95s from around the same period, if not a little older.

A civilian craft, though? Uhhh, what do you mean change the brake pads? We gotta think of next quarter's profits! Just gas it up and fly already!

[-] tidalwave@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

For passenger planes yes (I think most are retired before 20-25), but freighters fly longer.

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

Planes get essentially rebuilt a few times in their lives. If it's a good plane, metals aren't oxidizing, engines well cared for, they can go for a long time.

One big thing that took a lot of planes out of the sky was emissions modernization. New engine refit can cost nearly as much as a new plane.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Reposting my comment from the other thread:

Plane was doomed, that is simply not recoverable... explosive uncontained engine failure (including the entire engine literally detaching from the plane), possibly from runway debris, could cause catastrophic hydraulic damage and damage to control surfaces, looks like it may have taken out a second engine as well. Thrust from the right engine flips it over.

At max weight, you're too heavy, with only one engine. There's not enough runway to stop and not enough energy to fly. Intense fire burning up the left wing. Renders the aircraft completely unflyable. Sad to say, there's really nothing to be done at that point other than making peace with the end.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

news

24484 readers
574 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.

If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.

Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.

Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.

Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.

Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS