74
submitted 2 weeks ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 42 points 2 weeks ago

But electrical infrastructure—the generation plants, transmission lines, substations, and distribution networks that convert fuel into computing—operates on a five-to-ten-year timeline that no amount of financial engineering can compress.

hmm, sounds like someone should have had a 5 year plan stalin-pipe

[-] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

What I learned from all the business studies modules I've had to take in university is the whole economy runs on a 5 year programm except diversified and unconnected

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

And ignored, even?

[-] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

Market anarchy

[-] NeelixBiederman@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

Thank goodness we change leaders every 4 years. Guaranteed to never complete a five year plan

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Llituro@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago

meanwhile, china, smoothly integrating data center infrastructure as a part of other infrastructure planning

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely hilarious to watch the whole markets beat central planning narrative collapsing now. Although, caveat is that China uses central planning at the top, and markets as an allocator within the plan. Actual material analysis vs pure dogmatism of the west.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This comes to the conclusion that AI is not a bubble and will not collapse. It argues instead that it's growth is speculative and has inflated well beyond the ability for infrastructure construction to meet that speculation, but that this will correct itself in the market and continue growing after correction rather than collapse like you'd expect a bubble to.

I don't think that's true. It's not including the need for the AI companies to demonstrate profits. OpenAI can't exist on investor money forever, it needs to be generating $285bn annual revenue by 2030. And that's just one company.

These AI companies are going to collapse underneath their own lack of ability to monetise because nobody wants it. The investment money to build new AI shit will collapse when others demonstrate it can't monetise. Then the power infrastructure growth will collapse behind it. What remains will be a shell of the AI industry we see today.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, it's very obviously a bubble, and I think the very fact that they can't deliver on infrastructure investments might be what causes the VCs to start pulling money.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's a very obvious hard limit. Growth can't be delivered above that hard limit so the entire market needs to correct to at least that limit. That's the guaranteed minimum correction point, the rest of the issues will make it bigger.

Something we don't talk about much is that all of this investment money doesn't magically disappear when they sell these shares. They pull their investment out of AI and they put it into something else. What's the next likely thing that they put it all into? What is the second largest growth industry that isn't AI? Or do they cook up a whole new thing?

The last couple decades has been a series of techbro investment fads. Cryptocoin, NFTs, Metaverse, AI -- it's quite possible that a whole new fad takes its place.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah that's certainly a possibility, but the elephant in the room is that material conditions continue to deteriorate, and that's translating into increasingly volatile situation. Something is gonna have to give eventually, and it's not gonna be pretty when that happens.

[-] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

God willing

[-] fort_burp@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

the need for the AI companies to demonstrate profits.

This is according to capitalist theory but now that we're in fascist space it's possible that AI companies are propped up by subsidies (that might "guarantee profits" to dress the operation in capitalist garb and keep the fantasy going) while just being tools for data collection and surveillance to aid in repression and consolidation of power by the aristocrats, or whatever the small ruling class will be called in post-capitalist America.

Hopefully I'm wrong, and wouldn't it be ironic if capitalism, or at least a need to generate profit, is what actually saves us?

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't see how they can guarantee profits of a company that needs revenue of $285 billion. Google's revenue last year was $350 billion, total.

There is absolutely no way that they achieve this and the government can not afford to subsidise the industry to that kind of amount.

[-] fort_burp@feddit.nl 4 points 2 weeks ago

See the problem here is that you are sane and rational.

After the bankers' gigantic, compounded fraud blew up in their faces in 2008-2009, Obama came on TV and said that the government will not step in to bail out people who were underwater on their mortgages, no matter how fancy and ridiculous the loan terms were. This would have cost approximately $1.3 trillion, and the reasoning was that bailing them out would set a bad precedent; that one could take out a loan (or be the victim of fraud and deceptive practices) and not pay it back.* Instead, it was decided that the banks would be bailed out, and the cost for that has been estimated at between 12 & 16 trillion dollars. I know you know this but a trillion dollars is a thousand billion dollars. Just an insane amount of money, not to mention it's been 10x the amount it would have cost to put millions of Americans into the security and stability of home ownership. In the spirit of American style central planning, the extremely wealthy were made even more wealthy as a result of their abysmal performance at... central planning (designing an economy that not only allowed but rewarded the actions that led to 2008). Between the policy of "we (the fed) buy your (private bank) trash (debt) for 100 cents on the dollar at whatever face value you (private bank) decide" QE and the fact that the US has a sovereign currency which is the global reserve currency it means that the US can "afford" literally whatever it wants, and "the US" now means Trump and his cronies.

I'm not saying this makes sense (what you are saying is what makes sense), I'm saying that I don't think it has to make sense anymore... as if the past 20 years have "made sense" financially.

  • the PPP loans during Covid were literally "here's a 'loan', you don't have to pay it back", and you know who those went to.
[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

Astrid Atkinson, CEO of Camus Energy, estimated in a Utility Dive interview that Texas is seeing “five to ten times more interconnection requests than data centers actually being built.”

One must imagine Sisyphus building data centers.

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

TIL Texas is the largest energy-consuming state in the nation

[-] SNAFU@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It absolutely is. Around 2022, or 2020(?), we had a giant blizzard that even coated the arid oil wasteland part of Texas I live in, in snow. It resulted in outages and rolling black-outs for days. Absolutely terrible. It's gonna happen again, catastrophically, when the data centers arrive. Lol

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

i shamefully contributed to the wasting of water and electricity yesterday by spending hours upon hours with chatgpt trying to add some new features to opensnitch that i've always wanted... what a nightmare of a process it was, but after about 6 full hours we finally nailed it

[-] hello_hello@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

You deserve a promotion. After we lay off your other co-workers who did not incorporate agentic workflows into their routine you-have-been-promoted

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

you jest, but i was actually laid off 2 months ago for almost exactly that reason

[-] hello_hello@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm also partially not jesting (as in I was in the same sort of boat) and I'm so fucking mad, barely containing it.

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

i'm sorry to hear that, it fucking sucks for sure

[-] hello_hello@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Its not that bad compared to yours, basically I was banking on a job position at my uni and then the department got defunded because they put that money into their new fangled ai institute, so unless I want to work for free theres no more hiring.

They're squeezing all the grad students for everything they have and they didn't even have much in the first place. The good news is that everyone already in ai is being treated like they're chatgpt whisperers or some shit, I guess that counts.

[-] fort_burp@feddit.nl 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Very interesting article but it seems to be ignoring the elephant in the room which is that the capitalist is lying in order to fleece the public, not least through a government "bailout" aka give me money for failing. If a reporter (or even an average schmuck in this case) can do quick napkin math to see that the numbers aren't even in the right ballpark then the capitalist as well knows that, as they are generally obsessed with this sort of thing.

The contract in question—a five-year, $300 billion cloud computing agreement between Oracle and OpenAI announced in September 2025—represents the largest technology services contract in history. It commits Oracle to building, equipping, and operating 4.5 gigawatts of data center capacity as part of the Stargate joint venture, with revenue recognition beginning in 2027. The scale is almost incomprehensible: $60 billion in annual payments, sustained for five years, from a single customer.

That single customer is OpenAI, a company currently generating approximately $13 to $15 billion in annualized revenue while losing approximately $9 billion per year. OpenAI’s internal projections, obtained by Fortune, show cumulative losses of $115 billion through 2029. The math is stark: OpenAI must grow revenue approximately fivefold in two years—from $15 billion to $60 billion annually—merely to meet its Oracle commitment, let alone achieve profitability.

No technology company in history has achieved such growth. The closest comparison is Nvidia itself, which grew from $27 billion in fiscal 2024 revenue to approximately $130 billion in fiscal 2025—but Nvidia sells physical products with clear unit economics to customers with immediate use cases. OpenAI sells subscriptions and API access to customers whose return on AI investment remains, by most surveys, deeply uncertain.

Using Nvidia as the only one that made it in this example is kind of misleading, as the only reason they achieved that growth and give credence to the scam is via the scam itself.

Idk, the attitude of "well golly shucks how in the world will they pull this off?" kind of pisses me off because this is a scam, everyone can see it's a scam, let's stop pretending it's not a scam and take those hundreds of billions of dollars and instead of burning it let's provide every American with a home that has a (second hand / reclaimed / repaired) refrigerator and washing machine, and a (second hand / reclaimed / repaired) computer with high speed internet. Or even healthcare. Or even fucking enough food....

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

oh for sure, it's pretty clear this is a giant speculative bubble that will pop inevitably because the promises are directly at odds with what's physically possible

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)

news

24519 readers
745 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS