446
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 55 points 3 days ago

Idk I bet there are lots of beavers sluttier than me

[-] TeddE@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Conventions with tons of them!

[-] slowmorella@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 3 days ago

maybe a sheep that got cheated on wrote this article 😢

[-] Codpiece@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago

And he even said “Ewe complete me”.

Ffs Rhys.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

I'm definitely putting that on my dating profile. Sluter than a sheep

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago
[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

I've been baaaaad.

[-] bryndos@fedia.io 27 points 3 days ago

Surely there can't be that many sheep on Soay to come up with such an estimate.

I suspect the scientist got a bit lonely out there doing the fieldwork, tried something that he'd normally get away with on a domestic ewe, got rebuffed, and wrote this paper to slander the whole species as revenge.

[-] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Damn sexy sheep!

[-] Iunnrais@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago

This is actually a more interesting statement than one might think at first.

When we describe the habits of various species of animals, it’s my understanding that once a description is obtained, you can look at more or less any particular member of that species and see pretty much the same behavior. Monogamy trends included.

Not so with humans. You can find an average, describe trends, but pick any specific individual human and they’re almost certainly not going to behave as that description.

Some humans pair bond for life and beyond, never seeking other companionship after one partner dies. Others sleep around constantly with dozens of partners in a lifetime. And everything in between.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 36 points 3 days ago

I don't think this is true. There is certainly a large degree of individual variation in animal behavior too, it's just not that well studied.

I had a professor who studied owls, which are usually highly monogamous. But there was one male who always tried to have two nests with two different females. It was hard for him because he had to hunt twice as much food, but for whatever reason that was what he felt like doing.

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago

Bro just liked to hunt & needed something to do with all that extra food.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Also we have cultural layers on top.

You don’t see a sheep saving itself for marriage lest it fear eternal torture.

Likewise you don’t see a sheep putting its keys into a bowl at a party.

We are more than our nature.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Nope, that's not what it means at all

Genetically linked behaviors follow distribution curves. There is always variation in every population for any behavior. When a behavior is highly selected for, alternative behaviors become more rare...but they still happen.

A good example of this is homosexuality, evolutionarily speaking this behavior is highly selected against (reduced babies). It still occurs in all sorts of species.

What this means is that around 2/3rds of humans are strictly monogamous. Around 1/3rd of humans are promiscuous or partially promiscuous. These are instinctual behaviors that can be overcome somewhat by cultural norms. On an individual basis, for every 3 people you meet, one instinctually finds sleeping around to be their "normal" behavior.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago

So you're saying normal humans are incredibly rare. Yep.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

And the culture they live in

[-] degen@midwest.social 10 points 3 days ago

What does this say about the Welsh?

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Jesus tending to his flock: "This is not what I meant when I said be like sheep"

[-] Epp4@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 days ago

You don't know that! I like to believe that's exactly what he meant. Love one another.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Well sheep also eat grass; I think its more about the shepherding metaphor.

[-] Chakravanti@monero.town 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well, maybe he actually did and a bunch of never-getting-laid now-pedophiles "edited" certain details to less expression recognition and then raped some kids to keep word shut. Just Sayan. Watch out for that Ram.

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

Learning moment for me: does conflict of interest section not include known baises? why wouldn't the researcher being monogamous be listed there?

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Oh I am SO happy you have an actual monogamy league table here

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

I don't understand the methodology at all. Genetic analysis of a mother's babies would show "monogamy" if the alpha male in the herd keeps their status in multiple seasons. The typical polygamy relationship counts as monogamous, afaiu. Could it simply be that sheep change their alpha male each season, instead of everybody fucking everybody rules?

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

who wrote this list, idaho?

Gives new meaning to the term "sheeple."

kelly Stop sheep-shaming

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
446 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

17977 readers
2385 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS