152
submitted 2 days ago by Reannlegge@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NordicAnalyst@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

We need a internal pipeline; a focus on inside trade; I agree with carney. We need canada internal focus with an extranl focus on people that align with us

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 days ago

We need our own refinery capacity to produce our own gas, fuel oil and aviation fuel.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Good luck selling that idea to Alberta visionaries.

[-] dudesss@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm no climate change nor oil expert, but I do agree more bikes and less vehicles is the way to go.

It will be better on all our wallets, environment, and health.

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

We really need better public transport. Bikes are not going to help when it’s -30C and two feet of fresh snow.

[-] lemonySplit@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I spent over a year biking as my primary transport (commuting, groceries, hauling compost, etc) with -30C days in the winter just to see if I could go without my truck. Proper gear and a bit of forethought makes weather a non-issue. We're Canadians, get used to the cold again, folks. Get yourwelf some proper Helly Hansen or similar rain gear (WR is rated in mm on good gear), some neoprene over the handlebar gauntlets for cold/gale rain days (got mine for $15 from aliexpress) and get after it.

Big dumps of snow are annoying, but easily handled if the city/town actually invests in proper bike path infrastructure and snow clearing equipment instead of relegating us to the gutters.

Those little sidewalk snowplows/throwers handle bike paths easily and they are plowed here before I wake up to go to work (plow drivers work at night here so the roads and sidewalks are done for the AM).

Most of the complaints against biking in Canada are easily handled with a little planning and forethought. But the complaints are continually pushed by the auto lobby so 🤷‍♂️ doesn't really matter if they have a weak basis, most people will just regurgitate it without ever trying for themselves

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Take a look at this video, he goes over why this is actually possible: https://youtu.be/Uhx-26GfCBU

Essentially if you have a society that actually focuses on alternative transportation; it gets prioritized. Bike rides are the norm and don't feel like a chore, so when it's cold out people still reach for their bikes. Coupled with the municipality clearing bike paths BEFORE roads and you have the infrastructure to support it.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

The bike argument always forgets people with disabilities, older people, people with health conditions, people with kids.

You’re not going to the grocery store and shopping for a family of 5 on a bike, regardless of whether it’s the middle of a blizzard or a perfect sunny summer day. You’re not picking up Billy at violin lessons and Sarah at karate lessons and Jim at swimming lessons at 3 different locations spread across the city on a bike.

And then there’s just the issue of commuting to work. People generally already live as close to work as they can afford. People who can afford to bike to work are doing so by choice.

As far as “a society that focuses on this or that,” that’s the hard part. Getting society to come together and solve an issue, any issue, is the hardest thing to do in life. Nearly all the problems in the world exist because we can’t manage to do that. The fact that some societies, such as the Netherlands, manage to beat the odds is basically a fluke. And NotJustBikes knows that! That’s why he gave up and moved there.

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The bike argument doesn't forget these factors at all, in fact it makes them better. No one says everyone MUST bike. You can still have a car, and with more people biking there will be less people on the road, reducing congestion.

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We have a Premiere who is currently having bike lanes removed via the courts, and making it illegal to remove a lane of traffic for bikes. I am not holding my breath.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

I live in Winnipeg and tried to ride my e-bike this winter. What a disaster. There's not enough dedicated bike lanes (except in the downtown area), snowplows can't/won't make sure that wind rows aren't left scattered everywhere, shoulders of main thoroughfares - which are often graveled with steep angles towards ditches - are utterly terrifying to try and navigate, and sidewalks are often not plowed for days (or there are no sidewalks at all).

[-] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

In many cities bikes and motorcycles are illegal to drive during winter months. Just looking outside where I am living tells me the law is a no-brainer.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I'm planning to equip my CB300R with studded tires and a cage this year so I can ride it through next winter. It even has ABS!

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Studded tires are illegal in most CDN cities. ABS does fuck all on ice, basically turns off the brakes.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

It's legal in Montreal, and a requirement for motorcycles in winter.

ABS works on snow, studs work on ice.

[-] dudesss@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Better transport for sure. And its just a few days out of the year you may be out in "two feet of fresh snow." However proper winter gear and caution can still be manageable for a lot of folks even in the few days of harshest of conditions like the one you mentioned.

Fat bike tires, or winter studded tires can help in the case of severe winter weather. Dressing in good layers. Advocating for people biking conditions in your city.

The money you save will be able to be put into better gear, and maybe a Canadian E-Bike. And there is also the lives you are saving to thank yourself for. Including your own health with free exercise -- you may be able to cancel your gym membership.

Your city may likely have bike trails worth exploring for alternative safe and quicker routes. And a good durable bike would be a good way to go explore them.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

And transport it throughout Canada.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Instead of having the pipeline go through the US:

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Keeping it in Canada would be great, but expensive AF to build across that part of Ontario, which is essentially all hills and water.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, honestly no idea what would it take to change but it's an enormous vulnerability. This pipeline stops most gasoline production in Canada. And since we have almost zilch EVs...

Could it be replaced, or backed up by rail?

[-] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

I had a friend who was high up in a refinery years ago, and he once explained to me that many parts of the refining process are held separate as an artifact of rail companies and old oil kings being close knit.

I guess the idea was if you make it so we have to carry your product back and forth, we'll only use your product on our trains. The concept carried over with pipelines, people with interests in both industries ensured that the IP and patents needed for mass consumption were protected to essentially create the need for pipeline infrastructure. Otherwise they would have just bought miles of land and shipped near complete product to shore instead of the current back-and-forth.

I'm paraphrasing info i heard 20+ years ago, but the general take away is: oil production is siloed so the rich could get richer.

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

We need this and we need the Trans Canada pipeline expanded on. Moe and Smith were all getty about the development of some pipeline down to some state last year to sell our heavy crude.

[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

It takes decades for pil pipelines to turn a profit. By the time that happens, we probably won't be needing the oil, with tech moving so fast. I think the money better spent preparing for that.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Yes: with a good rail link and rolling petrol stock.

[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah. That would be multiuse and be useful faster

[-] Daryl@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

It only takes a few years, just months in some cases, for the oil that is carried in the pipelines to pay for them. You have to look at 'total income', not just the cost to ship the oil through them.

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

I hope this is not AI because I like it, wish there was a better place to watch it than youtube but you can always use Unwatched on iOS or AdGuard elsewhere (I think that is the free one that blocks youtube ads)

[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

It's from his official channel, so i'd assume not

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

And even if it were, it's still an official message.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Nice ad and people are listening. I hope we get real actions along with it.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
152 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

10989 readers
577 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS