329
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago

To be fair, we don't have any pics of exoplanets. Technically, we could measure their surface temperature and basic chemistry through spectroscoopy but I don't think they reflect enough photons for our equipment. They are usually identified by dimming their star slightly when passing in front of it. This can give an estimated size and distance from their star. And maybe atmosphere composition if it refracts! So they're not naming this kind of picture but a bunch of data with big error bars.

[-] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 day ago

TFW you live in a galaxy-spanning super civilization but your planet is dying because its ID in the central database has a UUID collision with another planet 80000 light years away.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago

"Works on my machine"

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Well, the UUIDs for almost everything we use are galaxy-scale already. Astronomers just need to up those random letters a bit.

[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

How difficult would it be for every single thing that can be cataloged and named in the known universe to have a sufficiently unique UUID?

[-] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

according to wikipedia, there are about 10⁸⁰ protons in the observable universe

you would need 266 bits to give each one a different number
if you are using base 64, you would need 45 digits
it would look something like this aGVoc3Z4ZnN5YWhkYiByaHNqc2hyIGcgZGhzaGVkaGJz1

[-] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

IDK, it's fun to think about because maybe the 128 bit UUID is still being used due to 40k-like levels of technical debt, and also weird edge cases that cause ID explosion. Like maybe the 4000 year old spec says we need to track micrometeoroids too, sorry.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago

Just slap a number on it we'll name it when it matters

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

And then someone decides to name a random planet simply "Steve"

[-] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

Manufacturers of computer monitors be like:

[-] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago

Sony with their headphones be like:

[-] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I believe that's intended, so it's harder for you to compare models from different retailers. At least that's how it works for mattresses.

[-] bryndos@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

After the generations of repeated offence to the Betelgeusish by earthlings trying to pronounce the native name for their home star, it's probably for the best.

"I seem to be having this tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle"

[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

There are so many objects in the sky that you run out of normal names very quickly.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago
[-] 7toed@midwest.social 2 points 16 hours ago

In the middle of my backswing?!

[-] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I discovered a new planet! Now I just need to think of a good name for it sets cat down on keyboard

[-] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Why not Zoidhuirorgerg?

[-] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Jokes aside, I'm sure there is SOME method for how they name what they find; I highly doubt they just use a random number generator. Does anyone here know what that process is?

[-] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Cat walking across keyboards at the wrong time of a group chat

[-] wischi@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

I'm not a scientist/astronomer but my beste guess would be that stuff is named based on the instrument/telescope that found it first and some number or based on survey project names. There are so many objects we discover, anything "more sophisticated" would probably be too much work. If something turns out interesting later it might get additional names or a nick name.

[-] TheOneCurly@feddit.online 4 points 1 day ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_naming_conventions#Modern_catalogues

It's based on their coordinates from earth, but the end result is basically what's in the OP.

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

After a few conversations it will be called HOGO

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
329 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

18326 readers
1489 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS