80
submitted 5 days ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vegeta1@hexbear.net 40 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They keep doing this but don't ban platforms like X that work relentlessly to undermine their political system and pumps out CSAM

[-] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 34 points 5 days ago

Liberal institutions are at a point were subservience to capital's fasciszation project overrides their self preservation. You see this with how the Democrats in the US are in constant, open disregard of the demands of a clear supermajority of their constituents, you see this in Europe were conservative and sucdem parties are enabling fascists even though it means they lose voters to them. Because they do not care about winning elections anymore, they do not care about preserving liberal bourgeoisdemocratism any longer, they care about fulfilling the demand of the dictatorship of capital and that demand is brutal, coercive, openly violent and overarching control of the masses through outright fascism. Macron, Merz, Starmer, they all work towards creating political systems that will eventually be wielded against their own parties once the fascists they have supported and elevated are handed over the palace keys. But they go along because the left will be hit first and because their masters in their towers of glass command it, and they are obedient lackeys that click their heels reflexively when the haute bourgeois shouts Sieg Heil.

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 40 points 5 days ago
[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago

God, this is beautiful…

[-] darkcalling@hexbear.net 36 points 5 days ago

Internet ID law in disguise. Soon there simply won't be any place to VPN --to-- that doesn't hit you with these demands.

[-] Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 5 days ago

People will be checking to see if their VPN has a server in the PDRK so they can get on line.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

Would the EUDI (EU Digital Identity) wallet solve that?

The goal of the project is to create a digital wallet where people put their important things like ID, when companies ask you to prove you're over 18 they don't get your digital ID for it, instead they get a token from your wallet that says "Yes this person is over 18". The company validates that this token is real with the EU body. The idea being that the company does not get your identity and the government also does not know who the token came from, they only verify the token was real.

I've never seen it talked about here and wonder what others think about it. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/sites/spaces/EUDIGITALIDENTITYWALLET/pages/694487738/EU+Digital+Identity+Wallet+Home

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago

Does every single website you visit have to do this transaction?

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

If they have content that's only for over 18s?

It's essentially similar to a one-use password generator, the wallet generates the token (password) then central hub verifies it without either knowing the identity.

Maybe you'd only need to do it once with each site? Then the sites would assume the account owner is always over 18.

[-] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago

Well hexbear is a social media site. So does it have to participate?

The definition of social media can't just be a list of currently known big sites because people will just move elsewhere.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago

It can and will be and governments will be fine with 10% of people going elsewhere while the majority do not.

[-] Soot@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

Whichever few countries hold out are going to have a bustling datacenter industry. Much like Tuvalu in the old days.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The west is just catching up to China which implemented screen time limits for under 18s a year ago.

There is a growing body of evidence that shows that social media use during development years is changing the way brains usually develop, we don't know what effect that will have 20 years down the line but it seems pretty risky to just let it happen and see. There's also plenty of evidence linking to social harm and depression.

Chinese limits:

  • Children under 8 are limited to 40 minutes daily

  • Ages 8–15 are limited to 1 hour

  • Ages 16–17 are allowed 2 hours.

The west will come up with its own boundaries and it will spread everywhere because the science is solid, these services are genuinely damaging to attention spans.

Some evidence:

Kids that spend 3hours or more on social media per day have 2x risk of anxiety and depression.

Another study showing it causes depression

It literally changes the way kids develop parts of their brain, we don't know what the effects of that will be longterm.


There is a downside to outright banning it though. Social media use is well studied to drastically improve the quality of life for LGBT children who find important social support and communities. They show decreased depression and anxiety from their usage.

I like China's approach better because it doesn't impose a blanket ban, this means that the good side can still exist while the bad effects are limited.

[-] HeerlijkeDrop@thebrainbin.org 4 points 5 days ago
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Devices have a mandatory child-mode that tracks it. ISPs too which requires a login with account attached to a real ID. This wasn't really very difficult for China to implement though because they've used real ID for online accounts for multiple decades already with associated normalisation and trust.

I think you can achieve the same thing with a degree of separation through something like the EU's digital wallet initiative so neither the website nor the government actually gets an identity of the user. I have not heard criticisms of that but it also seems like a fairly new idea, some may emerge.

[-] Keld@hexbear.net 32 points 5 days ago

Mark Zuckerberg should be in prison, children should get to go on the computer.

[-] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 20 points 5 days ago

children should get to go on the computer

Yes, but the school cirriculums should teach them media literacy. On computers that run a Linux distribution that requires you use command lines a lot.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The year is 204X in the United Soviet States of America. Its the end of my first term at Michael Parenti Technical Highschool, and I'm late for homeroom.

I make it to my desk just before the bell rings, and it looks like attendance hasn't been taken yet. I pull my Tuxbook T40 out of my bag.

It weighs like 20lbs, its battery light is amber, I'll have to charge it soon. Its been almost a year since I last plugged it in.

The room is a jumble of humming fans, idle chatter, and the sound of post codes from our laptops.

Our substitute is taking attendance on a note pad, he can't figure out how to launch the TUI for FOSSschool.

My laptop finally boots. It runs EdtechOS, some atomic Linux distro the Tech Education Workers Collective makes us use.

[ Welcome Student! You have (5) new message(s)!]

I type Mail into the terminal. EdtechOS doesn't have a GUI. Something about 'unnecessary allocation of labor'

its mostly junk. I have a message from my Political Economy teacher.

She gave my report on the socioeconomic conditions of the Second Great World Anti-Fascist War an F... She said its revisionist, and to see her during my flex period.

[-] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

As usual, I think the stated message is good, but this will continue to be used as a pretext for the sudden and ever increasing clamping down of internet surveillance and censorship, which will overall harm everyone. doggirl-gloom VPNs for all

[-] axont@hexbear.net 26 points 5 days ago

Children under 15 should only be allowed to use Microsoft Encarta from 1998 and then you can gradually increase the amount of computer they can use

When they're 17 they can use fark.

[-] rentasintorn@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 days ago
[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

This will probably make it easier for parents and cis people to abuse children, so I'm against it.

[-] segfault11@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago

hexbear affected?

[-] Богданова@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

As expected they're just doing liberal platitudes.

Nothing is being done to protect someone's body image from predatory beauty industry. Nothing is being done to start treating bullying like a serious issue. Nothing is being done to reduce violence, just hide it.

I'm all in favor of actually making the world a better place and significantly limiting child's access to electronic devices connected to online platforms, but so far their actions haven't shown me that they value human lives over profit.

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago

i dunno about kids, but i think most social media is harmful to people over 60. and people between 40-60.

should prob get on that.

[-] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm not entirely against reducing phone time but banning social media at the same time all those "AI" "friends" are on the rise, come on, seriously?

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

news

24560 readers
738 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS