32

“But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human,” Altman said. “It takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart. And not only that, it took the very widespread evolution of the 100 billion people that have ever lived and learned not to get eaten by predators and learned how to figure out science and whatever, to produce you.”

So in his view, the fair comparison is, “If you ask ChatGPT a question, how much energy does it take once its model is trained to answer that question versus a human? And probably, AI has already caught up on an energy efficiency basis, measured that way.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 10 points 2 months ago

People fucking hate AI now, surely talking about humanity as if they are a bunch of livestock will turn that sentiment right around.

[-] one_old_coder@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago

train a human

This guy has the same level of empathy as Zuck.

[-] gigajhand@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

dystopian novel type shit

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And humans also built the fucking power plants and pay for the energy they use, asshole.

[-] _lilith@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

by this logic AI has also used the knowledge of 100 billion people and has the same starting energy debt as a person. with the added bonus that it can't actually create anything new. Even their dumbass arguments can't stand under their own weight

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago

I can outperform ai while being powered by a bag of cinema popcorn, sit your bitch arse down

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hey don't get angry at me, it is them immigrants fault I had to dehumanize you

[-] 18107@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Those lazy immigrants, sitting at home doing nothing, taking all our welfare and jobs.

[-] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

AI actually kind of manages to do that: it takes jobs and then doesn't do them (or at least doesn't do them nearly as well as the humans it replaces).

[-] davetortoise@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago

These people fundamentally do not think about human life in a normal way.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It literally warms my heart to know they are all just as temporary as the rest of us. And how afraid they are of being dust in the wind

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Someone on Bluesky pointed out that, even if you ignore the morality of this argument, AI is trained on human content, so if we're going to start examining the human energy cost, we'll have to factor in the cost of every single human whose work was used by ChatGPT on top of the data center costs.

[-] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Which makes the fact that their predictive text models are incapable of original thought that much more absurd.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Maybe we could use altman to fuel the ai? As charcoal?

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

Idk maybe we should do something about this man.

[-] kurikai@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

I’ll get this one if you take Thiel

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Silicon valley was a huge source of revenue for America... And when you have one industry, or a bunch of individuals making all the money - it risks authoritarianism capture of democracy.

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

That's just capitalism working as intended.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 0 points 2 months ago

I wonder why nobody has Mangione'd those filthy millionaires yet.

[-] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

I have no idea why people keep using an innocent man's name to talk about murdering people.

[-] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Altman, Thiel, Musk, et al, need to be headed to the gallows.

[-] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

Oh good, the Bitcoin argument.

"Sure, Bitcoin wastes a lot of energy, but you know what else wastes energy? The Visa payment network."

Yeah, but Visa handles six quadrispillion transactions per megawatthour, Bitcoin handles two drug purchases. Not the same results, is it?

So yeah, training humans takes a lot of energy. But in the end, you get a coherent, capable and well functioning individual. Spend the same energy on training LLMs and you get a system that'll happily tell you to glue the cheese on pizza or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

wouldn't let that nerd fix a paper jam. visionary hallucinations. by that logic we should all die so ai might live cheaper. amen

[-] lithiumground@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Oligarchs see human as disposable resources

[-] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Y'know what uses the most resources, Sammy?

BILLIONAIRES!

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 2 months ago
[-] django@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

I'd prefer composting and growing veggies.

[-] django@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

The humans still exist and need food, even if they are replaced by chatbots in the workforce. The comparison is therefore useless, unless you plan to murder the unemployed.

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

A modest proposal

[-] IratePirate@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

unless you plan to murder the unemployed.

Well, that's precisely what some of the Trump-aligned fascists are suggesting on live television.

[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

What the shit

Also

involuntary lethal injection

as opposed to voluntary?? He's trying to soften the language by adding that (totally redundant) extra adjective to remove focus from the 'lethal' part

[-] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

I really wish Sam Altman would treat himself with the dignity and efficiency he wants to treat us with.

The ideology of evil eugenicists didn't die with Hitler, and they didn't die with Epstein either.

[-] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

He will probably claim to work a gazillion hours a week with an unrivaled efficiency, making him one of the most productive humans on Earth. Because these people are not just sociopaths, they're also completely delusional about their intelligence and true worth, out of money worth.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

You're right. I forgot that AI people had that mindset. A dangerous thing to forget, because people like that will literally descend into an ideology that believes you can kill others if they inconvenience you.

[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

There's an easy answer to this problem.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Do you think we could actually get that much processing power out of Sam Altman if we shoved him in one of those things though?

[-] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Tech bros deal in false equivalencies. In general they rely on the playbook of logical fallacies. The one they rely on most is the presumption that the technology they're trying to sell is correct by default as if it's a fundamental law of the universe. And that the onus is on others to prove them wrong. Rather than them having to prove its correctness.

They often resort to ad hominem by implying their detractors lack intelligence or they're emotional. This again draws on more logical fallacy that because they deal in technology it means they presume to own the position of being purely objective and correct by default. So anyone who says otherwise is disputing science itself.

In other words they never have to prove the veracity of the technology they're trying to sell because they divert the discourse off topic to frivolous arguments about something else.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 0 points 2 months ago

If we ate just one techbro the other ones would fall in line pretty quickly

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

We should just eat them all. They stopped contributing anything of value years ago.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

Idk man, I am really scared of prion diseases.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago

So don't eat the brains. Those are rotten anyway.

[-] puchaczyk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

If you eat one techbro, you consume about 300,000 kcal, which is significantly more energy than it takes to ask chatGPT one question. So who is more energy efficient, AI-atheists? /s

[-] UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au 1 points 2 months ago

So we power the LLM data centers with techbros until we are out of techbros, after which we shut down the LLM data centers. Pretty sure we'd be able to take a half day, honestly.

[-] qualia@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Chatbots aren't the endpoint tho, AGI and ASI are. Imagine a future where we could disseminate custom AIs to teach kids exactly in their unique contexts. Education could be throttled and specialized according to everyone's aptitudes.

And if the people are able to decide what future ASIs work on we could focus on massive healthcare, leading to inevitable healthspan extension. Then the rate at which we have to replace our population (and the associated spending of 20 years reteaching intelligent citizens) would be reduced as a consequence.

AI is just a tool. Tools are never rolled back, at most they're only regulated. Why not make the best of our future with this powerful tool? Just because billionaires are getting the headlines, most of the progress is being done in academia. Maybe AI will even help facilitate reduced wealth inequality.

[-] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Imagine a future where we could disseminate custom AIs to teach kids

I want kids to have social skills, so I will not imagine this.

[-] qualia@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

In what way does AI detract from social skill development?

[-] core@leminal.space 0 points 2 months ago

That assumes the AGI/ASI doesn't have gates keeping it from people. Sorry you only get the basic model b/c you can't afford it something better. An open, free, equally accessible AI for everyone no matter what is just not how capitalism works.

[-] qualia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're assuming the alternative that billionaires, despite being a tiny fraction of the population, will be in control of such gatekeeping.

Your argument against an openly available AI precludes the existence of things like the FOSS community. Smart people who oppose capitalist power structures (i.e. anti-fascists) certainly exist.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21303 readers
303 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS