They reaaaally don't want pictures of a burning carrier on the news
I mean they've spent the last 60 years telling us these things are invincible
Which, I guess they are when you fight countries with no long-range capabilities that you can bomb with impunity
They really want people to think Iran is some backwater without any modern infrastructure or anything
Americans about to find out the reason they don't have healthcare isn't because their military is invincible, it's because they got scammed by their Bourgeoise
You'd think that the fact that they haven't "won" a war since they were fighting the same enemy as the Soviets would tell them their military isn't as invincible as they pretend it is.
like >90% of US media, including media that has nothing to do with the military or national security, invariably has some inserted arc, context or dialogue scaffolding the concept that the US military is the greatest and most invincible fighting force ever imagined in the history of the galaxy.
if you say something like "the US hasn't faced anything approaching near peer rival in 80 years and at that point their allies were doing all the heavy lifting", no matter how accurate or well you cite your analysis and defend that position, you might as well grow a second head that farts from its mouth.
like you just told everyone at the 5 year old's birthday party that theres no santa
Killing me comrades I wanna see pics
I really want to see a burning carrier on the news. What about me? 🚢🔥📺😈😆
the lamestream media is not for us
Two urber enriched nuclear reactors are on fire.

~~These colors don't run~~
These colors can little a run, as a treat 
what does mr. "they wanted to talk but i said 'too late!'" have to say about all this?
"we're only pretending to run away"?
It's a tactical reverse advance.
why the fuck hasn't iran sunk one yet? cmon! do it!
Laif Marouf says they didn't sink it so as not to irradiate the environment and India.
I'm predicting Iran is going to sink a carrier with some hypersonics since the US killed 140+ Iranian sailors while they were waiting to head to a port. It wouldn't even be much of an escalation.
It's better to get them to run away. Sinking one if these things might have environmental impacts on the region
i bet a sunken aircraft career has less ecological damage potential than one actively engaged in war support.
as much as i hate to underrate the ecological destruction of a destroyed carrier group, all that JP-5 and other materiel degrading and corroding in a marine environment... the Straight of Hormuz, just from from heavy maritime traffic alone hauling so much fossil carbon, has got to be fucking gnarly.
its gotta be like port arthur texas and cancer alley already, an oily rainbow sheen catching the moonlight, caught fish coming with their own side of Quaker State.
I was more meaning a possible nuclear hazard
https://www.livescience.com/62489-dead-zone-arabian-sea.html
Who knows, maybe we'll all get lucky and it'll end up in the dead zone
~~BOO STAY AND FIGHT COWARDS~~
ahem sorry.
No no, it's all good
We all want to see one of these monstrosities sink
MURICA hasn't lost a carrier since 1945. Would be a major blow to cultist war effort if it sunk.
CENTCOM twitter account is the biggest copium merchant.
Typical bully. They're all tough when they get the sucker punch in, but as soon as somebody starts some serious retaliation, they run off.
news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.