186

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is one of many rallies in Iran in support of the government and the leadership.


short summary here, longish summary in spoiler tags below: Western standoff munition stockpiles now substantially depleted, therefore Western aircraft activity directly over Iran increasing (as is footage of attempted and actual hits against them) as the US attempts to transition more to using bombs dropped directly onto targets, Iran is increasingly in the driver's seat and controlling the conflict, world economy is fucked and yet could still get much worse very soon, if you require a car to live (especially if it's not electric) and cannot work from home then you have my sincere condolences

longish summary hereWhile I've seen several estimates on the current stockpiles of US and Zionist missiles and interceptors - somewhere in the realm of a third depleted, perhaps even up to half - it seems like we're reaching the point at which the US does not want to commit even more standoff munitions and is trying their luck against the Iranian air defense network directly.

We have already seen footage of Iran attempting to shoot down, and sometimes actually striking Western fifth generation planes like the F-35, and more footage along those lines is appearing for other plane models (with one side claiming that they evaded interception and the other claiming they hit it, etc etc, propaganda is everywhere, you know the drill). How much the US is willing to test their planes against Iranian air defense is a matter of debate. Strictly speaking, a few fighter jets and bombers shot down would be no catastrophic loss in the grand scheme of things, as the US has hundreds. However, the narrative of such a thing would be quite bad for the US - "You're telling me an OBLITERATED Iranian military can shoot down some of our most advanced equipment?? What are we gonna do against China?!" - and given Trump's deranged jingoistic rhetoric aimed to buoy markets, it's clear that he cares very deeply about narratives. Additionally, with Chinese exports of several critical metals to the US banned, the prospect of replacing these aircraft (and indeed the standoff munitions and the interceptors and the ground radars etc) is looking questionable.

All the while, Iran continues its strikes across the Middle East. Missile and drone strikes are reportedly on the uptick again, demonstrating that Iranian military capabilities have by no means been "destroyed" as Western propaganda claim, though it's impossible to sure there was ever a significant downtick due to Western censorship and outright fabrications. People around the world are gradually realizing the magnitude of the economic disaster that is occurring and may yet occur. Refineries and factories which deal with oil and gas directly are starting to slow down or stop production, and those who make products downstream of those are starting to follow them like dominoes. Outrage at gas station prices is rising, and many countries are considering limiting civilian driving and implementing work-from-home policies akin to the coronavirus pandemic. And now, threats are being made by Trump against both Kharg Island (where most Iranian oil is shipped from) and the Iranian electrical grid - which is highly decentralized and would require a prolonged bombing campaign to completely take out -and the promised Iranian reprisal would be apocalyptic to the Middle East. It would make oil prices rise to previously unfathomable heights as oil infrastructure turned off and remained off for months, perhaps years, and set in motion one of the world's greatest humanitarian catastrophes as the desalination necessary for tens of millions of people is shut down. It would also not be a symmetrical problem, as Iran does not rely on desalination for its water supply.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 79 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Per discussion in this thread, there are mixed views on the posting of Iranian AI slop. Some are for an exception to the rule because these are posted by the Iranian government, because they aren't trying to look like real video, and because they are fun. Others don't want AI slop period or don't want to set a precedent of seeing US government AI slop videos.

Here's a compromise from the war on drugs: let's try decriminalizing the posting of resistance AI slop. Go ahead and post resistance AI slop, but keep it to a dull roar, nothing that is supposed to look real, and it'd better be high quality slop. As AI slop memes get played or if this kind of trash clogs up the comm, we can revisit. Please continue to report AI slop that people feel doesn't meet the intent above.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 58 points 3 days ago

TRUMP TO ADDRESS NATION ON IRAN 9PM ET WEDNESDAY

[-] DogThatWentGorp@hexbear.net 37 points 3 days ago

"Folks Iran, we made it up. It's not a real place folks it never existed. I tricked you. It was a bit the whole time. We lost nothing and everything is fiiiiiiineeeeeeee folks."

[-] TheModerateTankie@hexbear.net 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 65 points 3 days ago

⚡️⭕️ A member of the presidency of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Ahmad Naderi:

  • Any commercial ship that wants to pass through the Strait of Hormuz must pay tolls
  • The time of completely free passage through the Strait of Hormuz is over
  • We have presented a new bill to the Iranian parliament to organize traffic through the Strait of Hormuz
  • This law aims to protect the strait militarily and manage its economy
  • The tolls will not be paid in dollars, but only in Iranian rials
  • This law will be a strong blow to the global dominance of the dollar
  • Any ship that violates environmental and security laws will be stopped immediately by our forces and in accordance with the law
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RobnHood@hexbear.net 60 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Footage reportedly captures the moment an Iranian ballistic missile explodes right next to us troops as they take cover at a us base on March 30th. As a reminder, if you see a missile, or other projectile and it looks like it’s not moving, it is in fact coming straight for you. Also remember to due with your pants on, for dignity. (Although if you are in the us military you have already abandoned any dignity you might have had)

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 33 points 3 days ago

Not right next to enough

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 58 points 3 days ago

Genocidal Child-killing Yankee forces bomb steel plants (again) and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

(Sorry only screenshots very busy)

Something worth noting: those spreading narrative that the US is de-escalating or trying to de-escalate are spreading Yankee-israeli-nazi propaganda whether they know it or not.

It is the US continuing to escalate while Iran is engaging in self defense to match. Dont get it turned around

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 76 points 3 days ago

The polls they are showing this guy omg we are cooked. What was this a poll of Raytheon shareholders?

[-] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 59 points 3 days ago

Showing up to the "manipulative poll questions" competition and my opponent is Mclaughlin and associates

squidward-nervous

[-] cisco@hexbear.net 46 points 3 days ago

I actually do believe that most Americans approve of killing Iranians and destroying their infrastructure. But if you add a second poll that says “I am happy with the consequences of the President’s actions” the graph would be inverted

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 83 points 3 days ago
[-] red_giant@hexbear.net 54 points 3 days ago

Imagine if Iran didn’t engage in a program of economic liberalism in the early 2000s and instead built a bomb

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 42 points 3 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jack@hexbear.net 141 points 3 days ago

France has denied airspace

Italy is denying use of airbases to US military

NATO IS COMING APART FOR REAL Y'ALL, THANK YOU ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THANK YOU MARTYR SINWAR, THANK YOU BRAVE PEOPLE OF PALESTINE AND LEBANON

DEATH TO ISRAEL DEATH TO AMERICA DEATH TO IMPERIALISM

load more comments (23 replies)

Iraqi resistance forces warned Washington not to use Kuwait or Syria as proxies against the regional resistance movements:

Either such misuse of the Kuwaiti territory or the regime in Syria's trying to target Lebanon's Hezbollah's resistance movement would be considered a "breaking down of borders," Kata'ib Sayyid al-Shuhada said on Tuesday.

"In that case, Iraqi resistance will respond by taking reciprocal measures to break down regional borders," added the group, a member of the Islamic Resistance in Iraq.

https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/03/31/766148/Iraq-warning-attack-United-States-Kuwait-Iran

[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 31 points 3 days ago

Iraqi resistance will respond by taking reciprocal measures to break down regional borders

gold-anarchist

[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 74 points 3 days ago
[-] Rey_McSriff@hexbear.net 49 points 3 days ago

Just today I was thinking how nice it would be to quit my horrible job, but I guess I better keep grasping this rose branch as tightly as possible

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

The IRGC conducted more retaliatory strikes on the US-controlled airbase in al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia:

"Today, we attacked the accommodation site of American pilots and flight personnel in al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia, using drones and missiles, and struck a gathering of 200 people," Commander of the IRGC's Aerospace Force, Brigadier General Majid Mousavi, wrote in a post on X on Tuesday.

"Now, in addition to the AWACS aircraft, tankers, and fuel storage facilities, a list of casualties and injuries among flight crews has also been added to [US President Donald] Trump and [War Secretary Pete] Hegseth’s toll of losses and damages," he added.

https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2026/03/31/766146/Iran-attack-American-pilots-Saudi-Arabia-IRGC-Trump-Hegseth

Tel Aviv admitted to four "IDF" KIA while attacking southern Lebanon. Meanwhile, Lebanese resistance forces released combat footage showing FPV drone strikes on Zionist military equipment:

https://southfront.press/israel-admits-four-soldiers-were-killed-in-lebanon-as-hezbollah-shares-drone-strikes-footage/

[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 81 points 3 days ago
[-] jack@hexbear.net 52 points 3 days ago

WOWEEE I CAN'T BELIEVE AI ISN'T FINANCIAL SUSTAINABLE WOW THIS WAS AN UNPREDICTABLE RESULT

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 88 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The US Air Force is deploying 18x A-10C aircraft for close air support to the Middle East for close air support for whatever ground operations thry have planned in Iran.

Source on flight tracking

This is really going to happen, isn't it?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] SickSemper@hexbear.net 47 points 3 days ago

Non-telegram link to the 3 FPV hits from earlier

https://tankie.tube/w/u4x5EWBzSLxZ824MKaUgJQ

[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 67 points 3 days ago

My colleague @edghirnourfrom @AJArabic did a timely interview with Iran FM @araghchi, here are the takeaways

  1. No negotiations, only messages. Araghchi says what is happening now is not negotiations, but an exchange of messages, sometimes directly with Steve Witkoff and sometimes through regional intermediaries. Iran has not responded to the 15 U.S. proposals and has not submitted any counter-proposal.
  1. Iran rejects a simple ceasefire. Tehran says it will not accept a ceasefire, insisting instead on a complete end to the war across the region, with guarantees that attacks will not be repeated and compensation for damages.
  1. Deterrence and regional messaging. Iran says Hormuz remains open, except to those “fighting Iran,” and insists it targets only U.S. bases and assets, not Gulf states. Araghchi also warned Iran is prepared for a ground confrontation if enemies miscalculate.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 70 points 3 days ago

🕵️ New: U.S. embassies to coordinate with Pentagon psy-ops unit and Elon Musk:

🔹Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed a cable Monday ordering all U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide to run coordinated campaigns against what it calls foreign “anti-American propaganda,” according to The Guardian.

🔹Embassies are instructed to recruit local influencers, academics, and community leaders to spread messaging that appears locally driven rather than directed by Washington. The cable also promotes X’s “Community Notes” feature as a crowdsourced way to counter anti-American narratives “without compromising free speech or privacy.”

🔹The directive tells diplomats to work with the U.S. military’s psychological operations unit and use X—owned by Elon Musk—as a key tool, describing it as an “innovative” way to counter disinformation.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 67 points 3 days ago
[-] juniper@hexbear.net 54 points 3 days ago

US markets right now: biaoqing-copium

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] companero@hexbear.net 56 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

China and Pakistan's joint ceasefire plan for Iran, after the meeting of their Foreign Ministers:

  • Immediate Cessation of Hostilities, with humanitarian assistance allowed to all war-affected areas.
  • Start of peace talks as soon as possible under the principle of safeguarding the independence and security of Iran and the Gulf states. All parties will commit to refraining from the use or the threat of use of force during peace talks.
  • The parties to the conflict will immediately stop attacks on important infrastructure, including energy, desalination and power facilities, and peaceful nuclear infrastructure, such as nuclear power plants.
  • The parties will allow the early and safe passage of civilian and commercial ships, and restore normal passage through the Strait as soon as possible.
  • Conclusion of an agreement for establishing a comprehensive peace framework based on the principles of the UN Charter and international law.

At first glance, this sucks, but "no threats or use of force during peace talks" is a pretty big deal. If this is serious, that would imply withdrawal of the US buildup and some kind of formal guarantee. There would presumably be no ridiculous loophole for the US to "end the talks" and then attack.

Note that these are only conditions for a ceasefire, not the final peace agreement. Reparations would still be on the table. Iran could use the ceasefire to consolidate their forces.

In my opinion, Iran should accept this. Basically zero chance that the Great and Lesser Satans also accept it, and it will be good for their international relations.

A big question mark is Lebanon and Hezbollah. Iran obviously can't leave them on their own.

[-] duderium@hexbear.net 47 points 3 days ago

my cease-fire proposal is that Iran should keep firing missiles and blockading the straight of hormones until Israel and the USA no longer exist. Then the fire will finally cease.

Speech-to-text is responsible for “straight of hormones” and I’m leaving it in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] replaceable@hexbear.net 51 points 3 days ago

I dont think allowing passage through the strait is a good idea, even temporarily, that would give breathing room for the west, allowing them to wage the war longer before the economic crisis onsets

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nah fuck this, China needs to fuck off and stop trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Them applying pressure on Iran to basically surrender and give up all their leverage is not strategic, and hopefully this is diplomatic bullshit for the public and not what Chinese leadership actually thinks is a good solution.

The strait stays closed until Israel and USA are brought to heel. They must be punished or this will continue to repeat indefinitely

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 46 points 3 days ago

If the Chinese really need their helium, they should negotiate directly with Iran

Pakistan is a US puppet state and the US/Israel would never honor any agreement with Iran. This is Chinese naivete manifest in its worst form; they've allowed themselves to be maneuvered into the role of useful idiot by US promises relayed by Pakistan. And I say this with utmost certainty: Iran will NEVER see a dime of reparations from the likes of the US and Israel and the US doesn't deploy expeditionary marine units for the sake of negotiating, they will use them first and the Chinese should fuckin know that

Politically and socially in Iran it would be deeply unpopular and will weaken the regime, Hezbollah would be left to fight on alone, and give the US time to redeploy and try again in a year

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 40 points 3 days ago

This only works if China provides strong security guarantees to Iran. If not, it's just another pause for the US to regroup and pick a different attack vector

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Blockocheese@hexbear.net 61 points 3 days ago

For like a week a few gas stations around me were stuck at 3.86 for the lowest price and the highest outside of cities was 3.99

Today the lowest I saw was 3.96 and a few were over 4 at from 4.06 to 4.11 (4.11 was in a very expensive area)

I think we're going to break or already broke the record for highest gas prices in my state and I just havent seen them, yet...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 55 points 3 days ago

https://archive.ph/wPT9P

The U.S. Military Risks Letting Contractors Define How It Sees the Battlefield

In the 1964 black comedy Dr. Strangelove, an emergency war plan called “Plan R” allows an unhinged U.S. Air Force commander, Jack Ripper, to launch a nuclear strike without presidential authorization. Once the president, the joint chiefs, and the Soviet ambassador convene in the war room, the bombers are already airborne. Only Ripper knows the three-letter prefix needed to recall them, until his aide, Lionel Mandrake, reconstructs it from Ripper’s notes. Although nearly all planes are turned back, one damaged B-52 cannot receive the recall message and successfully drops its bomb, triggering the Soviets’ secret doomsday machine and bringing about global destruction. The film’s lesson is not only about nuclear weapons, but also about what happens when critical systems are not governed effectively. Today, a version of that failure is playing out across the U.S. military in the governance of its integrated command platforms. The definitional layer of these platforms, which, for example, defines threat levels or escalation thresholds, is the proprietary intellectual property of contractors, ungoverned by an institutional process, and subject to change without notice.

more

Full disclosure: I’m the founder and CEO of Mind-Alliance Systems, which provides intelligence and wargaming solutions to national security clients. As such, I have an interest in defense contracting outcomes. But my work has led me to become deeply concerned about our government’s dependence on integrated command platforms it neither owns nor actively governs, because they can result in poorly informed decisions. Ultimately, a military that cannot govern its own categories cannot fight at machine speed. Some will point to the modular open systems approach as the solution to this problem. While this approach is essential, it is not enough. It governs the technical interface layer, but not the semantic layer, thereby enabling vendors to retain control over the ontologies. While the U.S. military may realistically have to accept some level of vendor-lock on these commercial platforms, it should refuse to outsource the definitions that govern how those platforms see the world, and maintain the authority to alter it before vendors or agentic AI change ontological definitions faster than any review process can track.

How the Map Takes Control

An integrated command platform fuses data from the military and intelligence enterprise into interfaces, enabling users to enhance situational awareness, assess options, and make decisions. Today’s integrated command platforms, like Palantir’s Gotham and the Pentagon’s Joint All-Domain Command and Control, pull in hundreds of millions of data points daily from operational databases, through satellite imagery, to signals intelligence, and across classification levels. The way these systems model an increasingly complex operating environment structures the decision environment in every major combatant command. These systems depend on ontologies: the structured frameworks of concepts, categories, and their relationships that explain what constitutes a threat, what “readiness” means, and where the escalation thresholds are found. In this article, “map” refers to the combination of ontologies and the data they structure that together form the system’s integrated command platforms. A system uses this map to transform data into information that operators care about (e.g., “this unit is ready,” “this pattern of movements is a crisis”). Whoever controls that map controls the situations the system both notices and ignores, as well as the prioritization of options that leaders see.

The U.S. government doesn’t have “representational sovereignty” over its maps, which simply means owning and governing the authoritative ontologies and integrated command platforms on which it relies. Through a series of individually innocuous contracts and licensing arrangements, the definitional layer — the part that determines what “threat,” “readiness,” and “escalation” mean within these systems — has been ceded to vendors as proprietary intellectual property. Once a platform flags a threat, these categories begin to appear in briefings, influencing command decisions and turning vendors’ ontological choices into de facto doctrine. Even with experienced officials in the room, the most consequential framing decisions that constrain how analysts and leaders think have already been made by people who aren’t there. If vendors hired experts to inform that ontology, it would be one thing. But often, the categories commanders rely on in a crisis are controlled by software engineers who, while smart and able to learn on the job, lack operational or regional expertise. Crisis management scholars have spent decades refining taxonomies as part of the International Crisis Behavior project and Militarized Interstate Disputes data. A vendor’s ontology and engineers, however, may improvise categories to fit application needs, rather than relying on the work of crisis scholars or doctrine specialists and testing the system’s conceptual models against the best available research on how real crises actually unfold. These engineers carry no doctrinal accountability for the ontological choices or changes they make. During a crisis, leaders are unlikely to question the categories embedded in their software. And if they do, it might be too late.

When the map produces a surprising output, the instinct is to search for a technical explanation, such as a misconfigured parameter or a bad data feed. The underlying model, which is run by nonexperts and not grounded in decades of conflict research, is rarely questioned. In my experience, most senior leaders assume that the platform’s categories reflect published doctrine. Few have ever seen the underlying ontology, and fewer still know who wrote it. Officials debate options and weigh tradeoffs, but the conversation rarely escapes the system’s framework. No one demands a second model built on different assumptions, even when the system produces questionable results. This also results in a significant loss for the institution, which never goes through the disciplined process of deciding what its own concepts mean. When operators, intelligence officers, and doctrine specialists argue about whether “pre-crisis signaling” is a distinct category or a subset of “gray-zone activity,” institutional clarity is built. Outsourcing the ontology outsources that learning. Consider a platform whose “pre-crisis signaling” threshold was calibrated to one theater and one adversary. When a different adversary moves forces in ways an experienced regional analyst immediately recognizes as preparatory, the system reads green. The analyst reads amber. And because the categories are proprietary, she has no way to show the commander exactly where the model’s assumptions diverge from her judgment. Organizational research indicates that corporations destroy strategic advantage when they outsource core competencies, which are the distinctive capabilities that cut across products and provide access to multiple markets. Government is no different. Defining what counts as a threat, what “readiness” means operationally, and where escalation thresholds are found is a core competency of command. It cuts across every platform and every combatant command and it shows up in every crisis. A nation that cannot define “escalation” in its own systems cannot fully control its own escalation decisions.

The Problem is Governance. AI is Making it Urgent

The modular open systems approach, now required by law for major defense acquisition programs, is often treated as the solution to this problem. The approach is a genuine advance: It mandates modular design, open interface standards, and machine‑readable interface definitions, and it gives the government stronger data rights to avoid component‑level vendor lock‑in. Yet the approach governs the technical interface layer, specifically how systems plug together and exchange data, but not the definitional, ontological layer. Two platforms can be fully compliant and interoperable at every application programming interface boundary, yet still run on vendor‑proprietary ontologies that no program office owns. To be clear, this is not because the modular open systems approach was poorly designed, but because ontology governance is a distinct, parallel institutional framework. Given the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, the Department of Defense has now statutorily chartered a separate ontology governance structure under the chief data officer to establish baseline ontological standards across the agency. However, that framework remains nascent, and command platforms that most urgently need governing definitions have yet to be integrated into this emerging structure. The gap between a modular open systems interface architecture and the chief digital officer’s ontology governance remains a critical vulnerability for decision systems.

cont'd in response

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Boise_Idaho@hexbear.net 51 points 3 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] companero@hexbear.net 86 points 3 days ago

⚡️BREAKING: The first obituary of a Ukrainian serviceman killed in the Middle East war has appeared? Anatolii Onishchuk.

The official message states: “He was involved in training fighters from allied countries, sharing experience in the use of Ukrainian interceptor drones.”

Just three days ago, Iran claimed it had struck a site in Dubai where 21 Ukrainian servicemen were present.

Yet everything remains deliberately vague—because Zelensky’s government refuses to openly admit that 🇺🇦soldiers are dying in someone else's war, serving someone's interests.

https://xcancel.com/i/web/status/2038948055098003457

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 69 points 3 days ago

An interesting piece from the archives, from 1994 when Kazakhstan cooperated with the US to hand over about half a tonne of highly enriched uranium

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB491/

The documents describe an extraordinary secret mission: In the autumn of 1994, the team of 31 Americans slipped quietly into a remote area of Kazakhstan to secure the 1,320 pounds of weapons-grade uranium and airlift it safely out of the country to the United States. From Oct. 14 to Nov. 11, 1994, working six days a week, 12 hours a day, the teams repackaged the uranium into 448 shipping containers. On November 20-21, two U.S. Air Force C-5 Galaxy airlifters carried the dangerous material and the team to Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, with several aerial refuelings. The uranium was then trucked to the Y-12 plant at Oak Ridge, Tennessee to be blended down.

So, about a month of work for 30 nuclear experts to pack this material up and get it out. Not exactly a fly by night, delta force smash and grab.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 66 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Pete "Pick a Number" Hegseth

"[Trump]’s said four to six weeks, six to eight weeks, three - it could be any particular number. But we would never reveal precisely what it is."

https://xcancel.com/atrupar/status/2038959273212825998

Short vid clip at the link

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

don't laugh https://archive.ph/uk8Jy

Spain to Send 5 PAC-2 Missiles to Ukraine for Patriot System

The Spanish government will transfer five PAC-2 missiles to Ukraine for use with its Patriot air defense systems.

The announcement came during Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to Spain on March 18, 2026. According to the report, the Patriot PAC-2 missiles are part of the arsenal of a Spanish Army air defense regiment stationed at the Marine Corps base in Valencia. Although the number of missiles being sent is small, Spain remains committed to supporting Ukraine and is actively assisting in critical areas. In December 2025, for example, the Spanish government allocated $1.7 billion to purchase four Patriot battery systems. The contract was signed with the American company Raytheon, part of RTX. This is not the first time Spain has transferred Patriot air defense missiles from its stockpiles to Ukraine. In May 2024, Spain provided a package of military aid that included a batch of Patriot missiles.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] RobnHood@hexbear.net 76 points 3 days ago

npr has confirmed that 2 E-3 Sentry were "damaged" in strike on Prince Sultan on the 29th of March. This includes the one we saw a photo of with the radome and entire rear section destroyed, hopefully the other one is just as damaged. This means that the US is down to only 14 operational E-3 Sentry aircraft and only 4 in theater. This plus the other damaged aircraft (The highest numbers I've seen have been 2 C-130H and 7 KC-135R damaged, although I think the consensus is that around 5 KC-135R were damaged) at Prince Sultan will likely cause the US to reconsider using the base to host valuable air assets, but relocating will decrease sortie rates and increase stress on flight and maintenance crews.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RobnHood@hexbear.net 76 points 3 days ago
[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 93 points 3 days ago

Italy's Defence Minister on the consequences of the Iran war for Italy:

“I am forced to know things about what could happen in the coming week, and the effects it will have on the economy and our daily lives, that no longer allow me to sleep.”

https://xcancel.com/paolomossetti/status/2038495808929112084#m

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] RobnHood@hexbear.net 81 points 3 days ago

From the Iranian Embassy in South Africa:

Remember these two criminals. Leigh R. Tate, the commander, and Jeffrey E. York, the executive officer of the USS Spruance, who ordered the launch of Tomahawk missiles three times, killing 168 innocent children at a school in Minab. Don’t they have children of their own?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
186 points (99.5% liked)

news

24698 readers
821 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS