1040
submitted 1 month ago by chigga@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 130 points 1 month ago

Why was chat control allowed to be presented again in the first place.

[-] chigga@lemmy.world 80 points 1 month ago

this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.

greedy corps going against law as usual.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, not really. It's because they retracted the proposal before going to vote, because they knew it wouldnt pass after Germany publicly said they would vote against.

Then they changed some stuff and send it again, which is now rejected as it seems.

Now they need to wait, but they didnt before.

[-] chigga@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

So this war is far from an end huh?

[-] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago

They won't stop pushing until they get it

[-] Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

We have to win every time. They only need to win once.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] leagman1@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago
[-] guy@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

The Commission probably since they're the only entity who can propose law

[-] leagman1@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

How do I respond to this^^

Yes, I think we're all assuming the law came into parliament the regular way. I assumed the "they" are supposed lobbyists who are standing behind and outside the regular entity..

Am I missing something or are you pulling a Nielsen on me? "Coffee?" "Yes, I know."

[-] guy@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Oh, sorry. Thought you actually didn't knew, my bad!

[-] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 73 points 1 month ago

Why do we have to keep fighting our own government for our rights? Why can't our government just represent us?

[-] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 31 points 1 month ago

Governments don't represent the common people anymore.

[-] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

We should topple the EU then tbh

[-] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago

Because unfortunately our rights are opposed to the will of capital and they serve capital first and foremost

[-] anugeshtu@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

To put it in Douglas Adams words: Because the politicians are lizards ;)

[-] lb_o@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago

BY ONE FUCKING VOTE!

https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574

Vote out every single fucker who is trying to limit our freedoms!

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thats actually insane in itself that it got that close. Next time they will succeed. :/

People are so stupid to support this. They dont seem to understand that its never about protecting anyone and its always about building dystopia.

[-] freeman@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Even worse I think there was one more vote for the extension but they need 50% +1 to pass and there were 24 abstentions.

load more comments (7 replies)

Can it just fuck off for good this time?

[-] chigga@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago
[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago

it's indicative of the system we're in. our oligarchs have enough money to pay people to push for this in perpetuity while the rest of us are forced to give up some degree of our lives to fight it off on a field of battles that's tilted towards money; they will win eventually unless the system itself is changed.

[-] ceigid@feddit.org 53 points 1 month ago

Will they just revote again then until it passes?

[-] chigga@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

hopefully no. but we are still in danger

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 1 month ago

This is indeed the plan. Only 1 time is enough to get this through the system. But it requires 500 times saying no first.

[-] guy@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

When the European Union is low-key IRA

[-] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That would make us Margaret Thatcher, which is very gross

[-] guy@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

Well based on the seats in the parliament, most eu voters are rightwing to some degree. So it's Tatcher going undercover IRA to bomb herself?

[-] iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Where can I see who voted for and against? I want to know if I need to change who I vote for next EU election.

[-] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Scroll down and select your country: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

It's always the ones you most expect.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] chigga@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think that Patrick posted it. basically the ones against where the conservatives, both left and right where against (even if there were some people inside those parities who voted to continue the scanning)

EDIT: apparently EPP voted against not because they want to support privacy but because the proposal was not enough invasive. they were afraid that it would have stopped their Chat control 2.0 proposal.

[-] WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

For those of us out of the loop, who is Patrick?

[-] kapulsa@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

Probably Patrick Breyer, who often posts about privacy issues in the EU parliament.

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/

[-] WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] dingleberrylover@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Definitely not a Krusty Krab

[-] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

i think they mean patrick breyer from the german pirate party

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 month ago

Why can't they vote on a ban to do any chat control bills? Stop this nonsense from happening again.

[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

If you have money you can ask the lobbyists.

[-] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Let’s celebrate this victory… even though it’s concerning that it is a recurring topic :-/

[-] iByteABit@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good, but pretty meaningless overall while they still allow lobbying to take place.

They pretend to care that lobbying means corruption from corporate interests, but doing anything meaningful to stop lobbying entirely and punish anyone still doing it would be "authoritarian communism" now, wouldn't it?

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They'll just change a few things and try again. I feel like we've been hearing about chat control on and off for about 5 years now and I can't imagine it'll go away soon.

[-] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago
[-] lb_o@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Dude, we're protesting now until all those fuckers who voted in favor of chat control are voted out of parliament. We have names!

[-] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Saw this then scrolled more to see the EU going after porn sites for age verification. 😞

[-] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

About fucking time for some good news.

[-] lb_o@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It is concerning news, because we narrowly dodged it this time by one vote.

[-] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I imagine they're thinking, "Well we will see what the new vote next month has to say about that!"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
1040 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

48357 readers
487 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS