201
Google is Killing uBlock Origin in Chrome (protonprivacy.substack.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by SleepyPie@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Literally everything's better than Chrome.

[-] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

I once broke my leg and that was better than Chrome

[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago

Wait!!! You mean the multi-trillion dollar mega-corp that promised that Manifest 3 would actually make adblockers more effective, lied to us???

[-] lonksawakening@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago

Still surprised there are so many people using Chrome.

They're this generations grannies who were stubborn about using Internet Explorer.

[-] encelado748@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There are only chrome, Firefox and safari. All other browsers are derivative of the one above. Chrome is objectively the best from the technical prospective: better support for web technologies, more stable, and better performance. This is not the same as IE that was actually a bad browser.

You either choose a derivative of chrome with better interface and privacy default (vivaldi?), a derivative of Firefox if you care about open web (librewolf?) or a derivative of safari if you have macOS (orion?). But it is still one of those 3, and if google kill manifest v2 then manifest v2 is killed for all derivatives.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago

better support for nonstandard web technologies

fixed that for you

more stable

what?

and better performance

yes it is a known fact that google sites including youtube are engineered to be slower on firefox.

[-] encelado748@feddit.org 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

fixed that for you

CSS scroll drive animation (standard), Cross document view transitions (standard), CSS corner shape, Multicol Level 2 (standard), some of the Filesystem Access API, WebGPU on linux, PWA manifest install (standard), took 3 years to ship documentPictureInPicture.

Facts are facts. Web standard are implemented first in chromium, then in firefox after years.

what?

Chromium based browser have strict multiprocess isolation. This is not true for firefox. If a tab crashes chrome it does not crash the entire browser. This is only partially true for firefox

yes it is a known fact that google sites including youtube are engineered to be slower on firefox.

Yes, and if you check browser performance on a neutral benchmark like speedometer 3.1 chrome is still faster. Also this is a fact.

Chromium is an objectively slightly better browser on paper than Firefox. Firefox is a much better browser for your privacy, for open source development and the health of the web in general.

[-] grandel@lemmy.ml 85 points 2 days ago

Sucks for Google Chrome users

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The number of people I see just drowning in ads is ridiculous. They're not using uBlock anyway. I don't know how they put up with it.

[-] grandel@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago

They are brainwashed! I asked my wife if she wants me to remove the ads on her laptop. She refused. She wants to see them.

I genuinely can not comprehend it.

[-] magnue@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Some people just don't like to tinker. They just accept the situation and live with it. For them the tinkering is a bigger headache than the ads.

[-] bigchungus@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

The "tinkering" in question: clicking ~10 buttons from the home screen.

[-] magnue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Some people call IT when they get a blue screen

[-] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Those are the same people who are using YouTube and or paying for YouTube premium... Who are the same people using windows

[-] voxel@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago

Some people can't tell the difference between a search engine and a browser. Some people don't know how to install software, and use whatever they got. Some people don't know better.

Them losing access to a tool like uBlock Origin, with the only alternatives being weaker options, is harmful.

I know of people experiencing blockage because they use uBOL, uBO was more effective at bypassing those blocks I assume.

[-] grandel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Very good point but I'd argue that if you know what a browser extension is and how to install it, you also know the difference between a browser and a search engine.

[-] voxel@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

Not everyone installs browser extensions themselves; many have them installed by relatives or friends.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

And "sideload" on Android.

[-] BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca 53 points 2 days ago

Librewolf my faithful friend always

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 days ago

Didn't they already with manifest v3?

[-] novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 days ago

They disabled it with flags, but manifest V2 still existed in the code and could be enabled. This is about Google now removing V2 from the code. That will make it harder for third party browsers to include V2, since they would need to patch it back in and develop new patches to keep it working.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

The point was made very strongly at the time. Don't use a Google driven chrome project. You don't have that issue on Firefox or its forks.

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I have NO idea why Firefox has such a low adoption rate. I've been using it ever since Netscape Navigator was outdated and ive never had issues with it. uBlock Origin on mobile, baby!

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 1 points 20 hours ago

It used to freeze up a lot; and, then, you lost all tabs, if it did. That's why I'd stopped using it and switched to Chrome, back in the day.

With all the crap Google's doing, I tried Firefox out again something like 5 or 7 years ago and it's now better than what Chrome offers (for me, of course; I'd've probably still switched, anyway, just to deGoogle my life further).

I do find it starts to massively lag when I get to a certain number of tabs/windows; but Chrome doesn't seem to ever shut off my CPU fans under the same level of load so not like it gets a leg up.

[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 14 points 2 days ago

Biggest problem is that people are stupid and can't comprehend that there are alternatives to the shit being served up.

[-] dropdrip@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I'd argue it's the government's fault. In the computer-age government's failed to educate their populations on what and how to use computers. They instead taught their students how to use X, Y and Z software. Ignorance here is the root of the problem. A symptom of ignorance could be stupidity I suppose... but users are lazy too. Governments also failed to regulate the nascent software-industries whilst pouring billions into that market. It's too harsh to just criticize the individual.

[-] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There's that saying... Can't fix stupid

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

I remember the junkbuster proxy from before this stuff was done with browser extensions. Is it time for that approach to make a comeback?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

No, it's time for people to finally get their asses in gear and fucking ditch Chromium-based browsers for Firefox-based ones.

[-] alia@nord.pub 3 points 2 days ago

Why the fuck does Proton have a Substack?

[-] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 8 points 2 days ago

probably for the same reason anyone has a substack

[-] alia@nord.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Because it’s too hard to set up a blog? No, they have one already.

Because they want to monetise their articles? No, they don’t do that.

I don’t see a reason for Proton to have a Substack publication.

[-] f3nyx@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

to reach the people with your message, you must go where they are.

this is marketing for people who are not already subscribed to their services or otherwise know about them.

[-] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 day ago

because they signed up for one. this is a shock for a lot of people, it seems, but not everyone is going to behave the exact way you think they should.

[-] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago

For spreading Nazi ideas?

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

49061 readers
1710 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS