85
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 38 points 1 year ago

No, Markwayne. You might. But nobody else needs to share in your kinks.

Your false bravado only reveals that you're a privileged coward with an inferiority complex so fragile that you think it's worthwhile to fistfight the leader of one of the biggest unions in the US, one that ostensibly commands a lot of blue-collar workers, over a tweet.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This motherfucker is lamenting that people aren't cool with political violence, and specifically references the type inflicted by pro-slavery legislators in the lead up to the civil war.

I know we are already living in the twilight zone, and the leading candidate for president is spewing nazi rhetoric and promising to put people in camps and imprison his political rivals. But can we just acknowledge that this piece of shit is going out of his way to embrace the kind of senseless violence committed by people who would go on to secede and wage war on the United States over their right to own people like cattle.

In a sane world, this asshat would have just ended his career. Here in the darkest timeline, he probably just secured his reelection.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

The fucking gym is that way you ignorant fuck. The Senate is where grown-ups talk with words to do things.

What the fuck did you run for? Idiot.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The really sad thing is that some people view what he’s saying as good. Might be the same types that say things like “real men don’t exist anymore” and shit like that

[-] donuts@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Yo someone check in on this dude's wife and kids, right?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

This guy's just upset his parents couldn't pick a name for him

[-] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Do they not have to watch those mandatory harassment videos, and ethics videos, code of conduct videos? Or is that just for us pawns?

How do I get in touch with US Human Resources?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://www.ethics.senate.gov/

Besides the voting booth and helping the grassroots organizations trying to unseat these might-makes-right idiots, that's the closest we've got.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Yes hate this guy is our Senator. Fucker needs to be removed from office. Also is shitty plumbing company avoid them at all cost

[-] flipht@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Is he granting permission? This should be exhibit one in any cases against someone punching him in the face.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'm hoping he loses a duel soon.

[-] DBT@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Says the man who didn’t punch anyone in the face…

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Okla-fucking-homa elected this guy. Of course they did. Qualifications: stands a better chance than the average voter in a head-butting contest with an angry steer.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

This isn't the kind of person you fight. Run, hide, get help, and defend yourself with violence as a last resort. Because this is the kind of person that will choose violence as a first resort.

[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yes. Yes he does.

[-] cuibono@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah YOU do seemingly need to be

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Seems like suggesting that you want to physically fight the Teamsters is good way to end up more missing than Jimmy Hoffa.

[-] Case@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago

You know, if I threatened violence in any work place I've ever been in, I would be shit canned immediately.

Why the fuck are these people not held accountable?

They should be held to a higher standard, with more severe penalties for misdeeds. Not just violence either, every kind of crime.

He is representing the people of Oklahoma... Which is par for the course, but it shouldn't be.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), the former mixed martial arts fighter who challenged a labor leader to a brawl in the middle of a Senate hearing room Tuesday, says that there’s a long history of violence in American politics, claiming in an interview: “You used to be able to cane.”

Mullin isn’t backing down or apologizing after his confrontation with Teamsters president Sean O’Brien at a Senate Health Committee hearing nearly came to blows, forcing Chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) to step in to break up the potential fight.

I was like, ‘I’m a guy from Oklahoma first.’ In Oklahoma, you don’t run your mouth like that and if you do run your mouth like that, you’re expected to be called out on it,” Mullin said about his heated exchange with O’Brien after the Teamsters official called the senator a “clown” and a “fraud” on Twitter.

Brooks came to his colleague’s defense by pummeling Sumner into a bloody mess, forcing him to miss work for extended periods of time over the next three years.

Brooks was later arrested and convicted of assault and fined $300 for his action, which Massachusetts Sen. Henry Wilson condemned as “brutal, murderous and cowardly.”

“You got to remember that President Andrew Jackson challenged nine guys to a duel and won nine times,” he said.


The original article contains 494 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That middle paragraph threw me for a loop, I was like, "He did what now? Why isn't that the headline?" Apparently, it skipped some context for that.

[-] Mpeach45@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, it is sort of consistent with the GQP’s intent to take America back to the 19th century, when knife fights broke out in congress.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
85 points (94.7% liked)

politics

19107 readers
1994 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS