184

submitted 11 months ago by quarrk@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] 4zi@hexbear.net 43 points 11 months ago

I know it’s a bit cliche at this point to go over this but it’s still surreal to me how we know we live in a digital panopticon that actively has changed our behavior. We do not know if we are specifically being monitored, but the fact that it’s a non-zero chance, no matter how small of a percent it is, has prevented true behaviors from being expressed. The fedposting emoticon itself is a ironic reflection of this. Who knows how much we’re willing to change ourselves just to appease some masters in criminal psychology suit sitting in a windowless cubicle in Virginia?

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago

Spies and infiltration have always and will always be a problem for leftist groups. Every revolution has to deal with counter-revolution by the ruling class. The tactics of counter revolution merely keep pace with the general state of technology, but until they start doing neural implants or something I don’t think it is that much more severe today compared with, for example, 100 years ago the Freikorps’ work during the 1918 German revolution. The USSR and Maoist China had constantly to defend themselves against internal and external counter-revolutionary tendencies. This of course is criticized by liberals as authoritarian “purges” because, to the liberal mind, all ideology is sacred as such, and above criticism. Look up as well the FBI snitches in the Black Panther Party and the surveillance of MLK.

All that has changed is today people communicate through digital media, so those media are of course insecure. The general character of revolutionary discipline has not (IMO) changed that much. If digital surveillance has only made people more aware of the reality of surveillance, then that’s a silver lining I guess.