37
submitted 11 months ago by NightGaunts@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

For decades, government scientists have toiled away trying to make nuclear fusion work. Will commercial companies sprint to the finish?

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

If only there was some sort of big fusion ball in the sky which gave us vast amounts of energy that we could collect if we wanted to...

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Today's shower thought: is a fusion power plant just a miniaturized Dyson Sphere?

[-] SoggyBread@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I get where youre going but not exactly. The dyson sphere would use solar energy but the fusion reactor, a tokomak specifically, uses steam generated by water pumped through the system to help keep the walls of the tokomak cool, to spin steam powered turbines

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

I'm constantly amazed that we're working on super advanced power generation techniques... that still use steam to spin turbines.

It feels like we should be doing something cooler, like plasma conduits from Star Trek.

[-] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Just about the best way to do it for an external 'combustion' heat engine. Stirling engines can be used in some cases but in most cases steam ends up being the better option.

We spent centuries getting really good at using steam for getting work out of 'hot thing'.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Look into what Helion Energy is doing. Not saying it will or won't work, but they plan to extract the energy directly from the plasma electromagnetically.

[-] BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I hope it works.

But I'm skeptical enough to say that I think this is a scam. We're closing in, research wise, on getting fusion to generate more power than it takes to run. Which is awesome!

But its still a far trek from that figure, to producing enough power to be practical (I've heard it said you really need to aim for 10x more production than input, minimum, for it to make any sense).

And that is still a trek from making a fusion plant competitive with existing grid power.

I'm skeptical if this plant they're building will even generate power, which is like three steps away from making commercial sense at all.

[-] wrinkletip@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago

You're right, but you can't use the word 'scam' for it. It's an avenue that should be explored fully and may or may not lead somewhere. A scam would imply it's a conspiracy where the players already know the unsuccessful end result, but are hiding it and using funding or similar for other end purposes.

[-] BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That is what I think the owner is doing here. Scamming venture capital firms for a tech that cannot work.

And I mean, its not like I have any proof. I can't read minds; maybe he is a true believer.

But this company feels like those companies back in the 80s that sold tickets to mars, for the rockets they were 'just about to build'; a scam.

This isn't a research firm. This isn't trying to find the exact settings and layouts to make fusion possible. If the article can be taken at face value, this is a company to make a commercial fusion plant. And I find that, in 2023, patently absurd.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I don't think I trust the commercial companies, but the research coming out of national labs is promising at least

[-] BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I agree. I'm very much for more research into fusion. I'm still somewhat skeptical of it ever being 'infinite cheap energy'. But even if it never becomes a 'good energy source', the advancement of knowledge is valuable. So its not like I think fusion is a scam overall.

But I think this particular company is.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

If it doesn't work, it doesn't work. Back to the drawing board.

If it works, then let's reproduce it a couple times to be sure that it works, and then start pouring concrete. Fusion isn't worth pursuing just because of global warming, but because it's akin to making energy out of nothing. We would have a nigh limitless capacity for conducting fusion and generating energy. A future with unlimited energy isn't a climate goal necessarily, it's a massive leap for humanity overall.

[-] Whoresradish@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Unfortunately everything I have read indicates very few experts in nuclear energy believe it could be possible in the future.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I have very significant doubts myself yeah

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 6 points 11 months ago

It will work eventually. Just give them another 25 years.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Based on current events, nuclear fusion plus corporate greed is probably the solution to the fermi paradox.

[-] Fafner@yiffit.net 1 points 11 months ago
[-] FrickAndMortar@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

ALWAYS just another 20 years…

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Like the article said, Fusion is the energy of the future... and always will be.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
[-] FrickAndMortar@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

👋🏼 👋🏼 👋🏼 👋🏼 👋🏼

[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It's not about any advances in fusion. It's about the list of idiots they've raised money from.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
37 points (87.8% liked)

News

23311 readers
1230 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS