Because if you have several hundred thousand dollars laying around to pay in cash, you’re better off investing that into an index fund which will have a higher rate of return than the interest on the mortgage.

If you have $500k and want to buy a $500k house, you could pay the entire $500k down and own the house free and clear, but you would only gain the appreciation on the house if you ever sell it. Assuming doubling in value every 10 years it should be worth $4M after 30 years.

If you had $500k and took out a mortgage of $400k, at the national average of 7% and 30 years, you would pay a total $1,033,654. If you took the other $400k you had and put it in just the S&P 500 which has averaged right at 10% annually, and left it there, you would end up with $6,979,760 in that fund at the end of the 30 years.

So you would come out ahead by about $4 million at the end if you took the mortgage and invested the cash.

Liquidity Risk: Paying in full ties up a large amount of capital in one asset, reducing financial flexibility and liquidity.

Opportunity Cost: The capital used for a lump sum payment could potentially yield higher returns if invested elsewhere. Although, at current rates that is probably unlikely.

Leverage: Mortgages allow for leverage, where you can control a large asset with a smaller initial investment.

Interest Rates: With historically low interest rates, financing can be more cost-effective than using cash. This is currently not true.

Diversification: Investing the money in a diversified portfolio can reduce risk compared to putting it all in a single property. See Leverage.

Tax Benefits: Mortgage interest payments can often be tax-deductible, which is not applicable when buying outright.

Insurance and property taxes are factored into the monthly payment, though it's not obvious from the meme