523
submitted 10 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 123 points 10 months ago

And the Republicans want to cut the IRS's funding by a huge amount.

[-] extraowl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 74 points 10 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago

You'd think they would be a fan of the people that caught Hunter Biden in a crime...

Do you think they could find out other people were committing similar crimes? And that those people are also rich? Maybe elected officials even? Hmm...

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago

They aren't interested in crime. They aren't interested in law. They aren't interested in policy. They are obsessed with punishment.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Punishment for people who aren't them or their friends. It's okay when they do it.

[-] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I believe the word is oppression

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

They’re obsessed with their own power and money imo. Prisons make money, and keep the proles in line using fear. That’s the whole reason for the drug war - Nixon etc wanted to harm their political enemies, as in leftists and minorities, while also grifting money from the government and increasing authoritarianism.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

you don't understand, after they gut the irs funding they'll replace all the management positions with politically chosen replacements, then force investigations to solely target their political rivals. No resources left to investigate their buddies.

That's the strategy now. All competitors are 'crooks'.

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago

I remember seeing a video of how painfully outdated the IRS is, so they should invest instead...

edit: found it - it's by LGR: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL5ut8o5pfs

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 88 points 10 months ago

change that m to a b in "delinquent millionaires" and then we'll have something.

A guy with $2 million isn't the problem, the guy with $1 billion is.

"What's the difference between a million and a billion?"

"About a billion."

[-] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 49 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Any shithead not paying their taxes is a problem

-someone who actually pays taxes

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Given its $160k a year for an auditor’s salary… maybe $200 when all is said and done with benefits, then $2 million is a solid return on investment. I’ll take it.

[-] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

What about the guy with $999 millions?

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

That's the logic they all follow .... I don't own $1 billion .. I own $1 million and everyone else just calls it $1 billion and I tell some people to believe it and others to not believe it ... it's all a question of faith and belief ... my shareholders believe I have $1 billion but we tell the government to believe that I only own $1 million.

When you have access to millions and billions, you can make anyone believe whatever you want them to believe.

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s all really power in the end. Which is why you see many of the most powerful people in the world nowhere near the “Forbes” list. Money is a representative of power under capitalism, but having more money than everyone else isn’t necessary to have power over them.

Case in point Elongated Muskrat. Sure he is powerful enough to destroy one of the biggest social media networks, but he can’t change the system as a whole, and if the system deems him too much of a nuisance he is gone

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That’s only 2 commas. Oof. Financial ruin.

https://youtu.be/s9Bg4UU76so?si=9nMV7tpgCd5GCHDI

[-] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

at first I thought this was gonna say “change that m to a b in $500 million” 🤣

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

I mean, both would be good.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 59 points 10 months ago

That's an interesting euphemism for tax fraud.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

Which is probably less than a percent of what they owe if the IRS would successfully unravel all those Delaware, Kitts and Nevis, Bermudas, etc. "company" structures.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Delinquent millionaires is such a great phrase.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago

Could be a lot more, but I'll take it. Hopefully they keep rolling. These people are a drain on society.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago

Getting $500MILLION from Millionaires is HORRIBLE! We need to SAVE that money by Starving Children instead!

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Texas & 14 other #GOP states are doing just that.

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

The article doesn't seem to indicate the ROI of the influx of new money to the IRS vs extra money received because of this influx. Only reason I care about ROI with this agency is 1) only real agency that makes money. 2) IRS had indicated before that they can generate something like 7 USD per 1 USD they are given for funding and I'd like to see if that plays out.

Regardless, I'm glad te IRS is getting the funding it needs to go after the rich.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

They basically get an extra $6 billion each year over the next decade. So this would be a decent chunk of that. They have also recovered hundreds of millions in fraudulent PPP loans. They are also pushing to recover $29 billion in back taxes from Microsoft. A lot of those things they would not have been able to do before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 15 points 10 months ago

Is that all? Seems exceedingly low.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Centrists gonna be like "he taxed the rich more than any president evar" even though this is an insulting pittance.

[-] BustinJiber@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

So that's one guy, how many more to go?

[-] qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Peanuts, really...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
523 points (98.9% liked)

News

23397 readers
1678 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS