262
submitted 2 years ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] starflower@lemmy.blahaj.zone 208 points 2 years ago

Your friendly reminder that the Brave CEO is Mozillas old CEO, who was fired from Mozilla for being unapologetically homophobic.

[-] VerseAndVermin@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago

Since everyone else is piling on negatively, I appreciated your friendly reminder.

[-] Rose@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Worse than merely being homophobic, as he financially supported politicians and causes that worked to prevent equal rights.

load more comments (69 replies)
[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 120 points 2 years ago

The scam company brave? The one that scams people? With their scam based crypto rewards that don't pay out? THAT brave?

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] tazy@lemmy.tazy.xyz 96 points 2 years ago

fuck brave all my homies hate brave

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 89 points 2 years ago

Honestly you really should be using Firefox.

load more comments (41 replies)
[-] bc1@lemmy.l0l.city 82 points 2 years ago

Whenever people tell me to use Brave, I know they fall for marketing very easily

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] moitoi@feddit.de 51 points 2 years ago

Brave to end 'Strict' fingerprinting protection as it breaks owns ad revenue.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 years ago

Another issue is that Strict mode is used by roughly 0.5% of Brave's users, with the rest using the default setting, which is the Standard mode.

How are they getting this data? If it's with telemetry this data doesn't seem reliable, I doubt that people who change the fingerprint setting don't disable telemetry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol 33 points 2 years ago

I used brave for a while, but left as I felt there was something fishy about them. Seems I was right

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 2 years ago

Not that brave after all.

[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I'd rather have the sites break to be honest

[-] Byter@lemmy.one 14 points 2 years ago

I'd ask why they don't make it optional (I'm not a Brave user) but it seems it was.

Another issue is that Strict mode is used by roughly 0.5% of Brave's users, with the rest using the default setting, which is the Standard mode.

This low percentage actually makes these users more vulnerable to fingerprinting despite them using the more aggressive blocker, because they constitute a discernible subset of users standing out from the rest.

Given that, I'm inclined to agree with the decision to remove it. Pick your battles and live to fight another day.

[-] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

Unless there’s a strong correlation between those who set fingerprint protection to strict and those that disable telemetry

In that case they’re about to piss off a much larger portion of their users than they realize

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago

I don't like brave browser from first use. Something seemed off.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
262 points (96.1% liked)

Privacy

40410 readers
324 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS