850
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 86 points 8 months ago

Bro, not only are they sentient, the trees fucking hate us. Allergies aren't just something that happens as a quirk of evolution. Those trees are filling the air with their jizz in a coordinated effort to take us out bro. The trees are trying to kill us bro.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 107 points 8 months ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes. Is that dent where Vader’s executor crashed into it?

[-] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago
[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 8 months ago
[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago

M Night Shyamalan did a documentary on this I think

[-] THE_ANTIHERO@lemmy.today 3 points 8 months ago
[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’m making a joke about The Happening, friend. It’s a movie where plants make people kill themselves. Sorry to disappoint

[-] THE_ANTIHERO@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

Huh no prob

[-] Numhold@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago

Considering what we do to them, they have every right to defend themselves.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

As an asthmatic hay-fever sufferer, fuck yeah - you're onto something!

[-] arken@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

There's a theory that allergies are getting worse due to an imbalance of gender selection when planting trees in urban environments. Here is some additional context.

[-] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

I'm sorry to say that that is most likely a myth that scientists have been hyping each other up about.

https://www.sciencealert.com/does-a-vast-network-of-fungi-connect-forests-heres-what-we-know

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

I just want to point out that this source indicates researchers reviewed 1500 papers on the topic and found that unsupported claims had doubled.

However, they never indicate the number or give a percentage of those 1500 papers that featured unsupported claims.

So is it doubling from 2 to 4, or from 700 to 1400? Because that's a major difference.

This is a problem with AI articles on science. They skim other AI articles and repeat without bringing all the important facts with them. Then we get dozens of results for one claim about science, with only maybe one or two original sources.

Then the idea spreads through reddit or whatever forum you prefer.

We know trees share resources, that they have been demonstrated to signal pain and danger to other plants, that they signal food availability to pollinators via electromagnetic fields. We have had hard evidence for all of this.

[-] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Yes? Hard evidence? Where?

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 13 points 8 months ago

David Attenborough said it, opinion discarded

[-] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

..damn, the Borough at work again!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DeadpanSlim@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It's an interesting hypothesis run amok because a core group of biologists WANTED it to be true so badly.

There's a GREAT episode (ep. 425) from the In Defense of Plants podcast that covers the misinformation and misunderstanding perfectly.

[-] maculata@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks! I’ve listen to a couple of those. The info is good, but there’s something a little off-putting about the guy’s delivery. Not sure what it is.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

Consider that human neuron makes around 7000 connections, while plant cells via plasmodesma may make from 1k to 100k connections.

We have such a human-centric and focused interpretation of knowing, and what qualifies as intelligence. Something that these recent series of advances should impress upon you is that maybe, complexity alone is enough. Obviously whatever we've built out of silicon isn't something we'd describe as intelligence. But the hint that maybe just 'having a preposterous number of connections' might be sufficient for emergent properties like reason and memory and identity.

So then what about plants? Discount the incredible relationships they make with fungi. Just plants are foreign enough to us to maybe give you a bit of caution. They are easy to take for granted because they are so ubiquitous. Internally they're as networked as you or I. They're constantly gathering information about the world around them. What does a plant know of the wind or the sun? Where would a plant put its 'self' if it had one?

[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Probably not in my butt, but that's where it's going! ;)

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

If complexity alone is enough, then why wouldn't silicon brains connected to multiple external sensors be enough? The computer scientist are even starting to experiment with bio fuel cells that convert light to energy, and using fuzzy logic for AI networks. Our brains are giant fuzzy logic processors.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

We have such a human-centric and focused interpretation of knowing, and what qualifies as intelligence.

This has been my response to all of the bullshit alien claims recently. It's always some kind of very human-centric idea of a bipedal being using a second thing as a vehicle. Just that entire concept is so human-centric.

If extraterrestrial ilfe exists, it's not going to resemble humans. Unless it's literally our cosmic ancestors or some shit.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jeremyparker@programming.dev 37 points 8 months ago

Y'all mf'ers need to read The Secret Life of Plants. It's fascinating.

It's from the 1970s or 80s, and it talks about this stuff in extreme depth - plant communication, plants understanding their environment... Long range communication & telepathic plants...

You gotta understand, there's absolutely zero science to it -- TSLoP is richly detailed with unconfirmed anecdotal evidence, some lady said this, a man from Tucson said this other thing, etc. If it was real, it would be world changing, but, at this point, it's a pretty crazy claim that would need some pretty crazy evidence.

But it's still fascinating -- both from it's own kayfabe, like, imagine a world in which this was real -- and in terms of "conspiracy theories" -- is not a conspiracy but it's clear bullshit so the who and why of it's believers is interesting. Because it's not like most conspiracies, which usually eventually lead back to antisemitic and Christian supremacist stuff. TSLoP is a legit leftist conspiracy, all its own thing.

So, if you see The Secret Life of Plants at a used bookstore for a couple dollars, pick it up, it's really neat.

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

The mycorrhizal networks are a real phenomenon, and as recently as 2016 were confirmed to share resources between trees.

Researchers exposed certain trees to a specific carbon isotope and found their unfed neighbors were processing that specific isotope despite not being exposed.

We've also found that many plants generate interacting electrical fields that help promote pollination and may indicate to pollinators which plants are ready to be harvested.

We've also found, by sequencing fungal DNA, that mother trees do have a resource sharing preference for their direct offspring.

We don't have hard evidence for direct communication between trees, in the sense that we don't speak tree. We do have hard evidence that they share resources, have preferences, express pain signals externally and other plants react, and can indicate information to other species.

[-] arken@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Thank you for taking the time to comment in this thread.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

A few years ago, a group of giraffes were placed in a field surrounded by enough acacia trees to ensure their food, but after a short time the giraffes began to get sick. The cause is the acacias. These, when the giraffe eats its shoots, releases a toxic substance to the other shoots that makes them toxic and also sends signals to the surrounding acacias that also make them toxic. The giraffes, therefore, in freedom, after eating from an acacia, move to others of several km to continue in these, but this in an enclosure was not possible.

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 7 points 8 months ago

This comment is the definition of joie de vivre.

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I like this comment for many reasons, but I'll mention just that I have never heard the word "kayfabe" until today and I love it!

[-] jeremyparker@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

I hadn't heard it either until FD Signifier used it in a video. I guess it originally referred to the "in universe" fiction of professional wrestling, but FD took it out of that context and now I use it all the time -- well, it doesn't come up that often, but it's a concept that's needed a word for a while now... Especially now that "alternative facts" are becoming so prevalent.

[-] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks for the tip, I’ll keep an eye out for it.

[-] coffeejunky@beehaw.org 26 points 8 months ago
[-] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 6 points 8 months ago

But it helps me anthropomorphize them into ents so it must be true

[-] yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com 24 points 8 months ago

I actually witnessed a similar thing today. A girl was going into an extensive history lecture to her boyfriend that later just got up and started walking away and then they got into a fight over it.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

RIP in peace

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

For some updated information on the continued research into plant communication, I would suggest a video by Anton Petrov

Mindblowing Video of Plants Talking to Each Other In Real Time

[-] LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago

Life is so cool. Sucks we are ruining it.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

My kind of lady

[-] Aderyna@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

This is basically the storyline of a new book I just read - The Canopy Keepers by Veronica Henry

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 months ago

So the Lorax is a myconid?

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago
[-] pythonoob@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

This kid looks like a young Tom holland

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Tom Holland already looks like a young Tom Holland though

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] muzzle@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Merlin Sheldrake be like ⬆️

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
850 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
3787 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS