• Communists didn't steal africans from their homes and ship them across the ocean.
• Communists didn't organize the white working class to go to war against slave rebellions.
• Communists didn't set the Americas on fire and put Native Americans in concentration camps from Nunavut to Tierra del Fuego.
• Communists didn't build railroads in Central America to extract resources from the impoverished, turning them into fruit pickers for American wealth.
• Communists didn't intentionally overextract from colonial India, causing millions to die from famine.
• Communists didn't draw the maps that turned west asia into a tinderbox of constant warfare.
• Communists didn't make the world dependent on the petrodollar and accelerate climate change.
• Communists didn't drop 7.6 million tons of bombs on Vietnam.
• Communists didn't train Suharto on the art of dictatorship at a military base in Kansas.
• Communists didn't take away Chile's right to self determination and sell its factories to American owners.
• Communists didn't obliterate North Korea until one of the most christian nations in the world didn't have a single church standing.
• Communists didn't hollow out Iraq for oil.
• Communists didn't sell that factory and move it to Bangladesh because the workers unionized.
• Communists don't run Blackrock.
• Communists are not landlords.
• Communists aren't on the board that owns your job.

Liberalism existed when all these things happened and what did it do besides feebly step aside for big business interests? At some point you have to realize the ideology is genocide all the way to its core. Liberalism IS Capitalism.

If you fear that communists are coming for you, then you need to ask yourself if your wages are worth it to sell the rest of humanity to the machine. The clock is ticking and climate change is not patient anymore.

It genuinely kinda sucks how you drive-by libs never ever reply. You're not even getting the PPB treatment, and yet you still can't even be bothered responding to one of the many good-faith replies you get. And then libs yell about how hexbear bad.

EDIT: when a lib replies and it's "I don't think nazis should have been executed"

mm yes, i too like to deliberately swap the victims and the perpetrators. me smart.

Hmmmm it's almost like the consequential factor lies in the differences bewteen liberals and communists

I wonder what those crucial differences are

If you replace "Nazi" with "liberals", you get the question that most of us non-liberals ask ourselves.

You call Nazis bloodthirsty, then go on how you want Nazi Germany and all its allies wiped from the face of the earth, and execute anyone you consider a Nazi

If someone came up to you and spit this nonsense at you, would you take it seriously?

You support the mass starvation of children, you support genocide

All we want is justice, no one made you support Genocide Joe

1a) I need your honest opinion: Was executing the (few) Nazi leaders post WWII justified? Yes/no will suffice.

1b) Is it justified to execute egregious offenders of human rights and those who participate in or actively create the conditions for atrocities like mass murders or genocides? For this question, assume the UN definitions are the standard used and assume the people in question are found guilty and all legal options are exhausted on their end to reverse the decision. Do you think it's justifiable to remove people like this from the world? Yes/no again will suffice

The reason those two questions are relevant is because humanity generally agrees that yes, people who commit such crimes should be removed. If that means super forever prison or execution, I'm not sure that part matters, they will be gone from society either way.

The problem with your thought process is you are assuming that the top leadership of the US/NATO powers/EU broadly/AU/NZ (the "West" going forward) aren't guilty of the same crimes for which the historical punishment was death/forever prison.

I don't know if this comes from ignorance (the most likely reason) or willful overlooking of facts. But the facts are, and they are facts, the West has perpetuated and is still perpetuating atrocities that add up to multiple Holocausts over the decades. If the German leaders deserved death for their crimes post-war, then what the fuck do American leaders deserve for actively fueling a genocide in Gaza?

The issue is you are seeking hypocrisy where there is none to be found on this issue. To compare criminals perpetrating crimes (the leaders, militaries, media cheerleaders) with justice being dealt to those perpetrators is flawed.

It would be "hypocrisy" if the statement from communists (just to continue using them since that was one of the original groups. Liberals and communists) was "we condemn liberals for their violence and bloodthirst. It is objectionable to kill a person for any reason including as retribution for crimes they committed." Or something along those lines. That isn't the statement nor can it be genuinely inferred on a broad basis.

In short, you are equating specific, deliberate justice (in the form of targeted executions after some form of trial. Think of Nuremberg if it helps) with the general tendency towards violence and the background of killing that these leaders allow, excuse, and actively perpetrate on a continual basis.

You have not discovered some underlying hypocrisy. You just refuse to acknowledge that liberals are doing the crimes ie they are bloodthirsty. And since I've seriously held back so far on personal accusations, I won't make one now, but I will say this requires the mindset of genocide denialism to even begin to believe that there is hypocrisy on display. It would require the exact same mindset as someone upset over Nazis leaders facing execution. Or perhaps Southern US slavers facing execution post-war. It requires refusing to accept that one side is doing egregious crimes while the other side is advocating for ending those crimes and dealing out legal punishments to perpetrators.

WHATABOUTISM