270
submitted 6 months ago by FenrirIII@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 85 points 6 months ago

Dealers will install a tube to let gasoline flow away from hot surfaces to the ground below the vehicle.

Let's just throw it on the ground, definitely a better solution than making sure it won't leak

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 47 points 6 months ago

Let's just throw it on the ground, definitely a ~~better~~ cheaper solution than making sure it won't leak

Fixed it for you.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 14 points 6 months ago

Happy Birthday to the ground!

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That's not my mom, that's a cell phone!

[-] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Patrick foretold!
"We take this thing here... and push it all the way over here."

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Internalize profits, externalize costs

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 64 points 6 months ago

They’re not fixing the leaks, they’re making the car detect when it starts spraying gasoline inside the engine compartment so it will enter limp mode before a fire starts.

The driver can then push their disabled car to the side of the road, and assuming they weren’t killed in traffic, then Ford will replace the faulty injector.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago

So they're making the "Found On Road Dead" joke a reality?

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Fix Or Repair Daily would be more profitable. What are they, stupid?

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 points 6 months ago

I always thought it was Fix Or Replace Daily?

Fix & Repair are kinda the same thing...?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Limp mode still let's you drive, it just reduces max revs and power.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Are you sure? It’sa Ford after all. Limp mode could mean a hammer drops from under the dash, smashes one of your knees, and puts you in limp mode.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago

"Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

Woman on plane: Are there a lot of these kinds of accidents?

Narrator: You wouldn't believe.

Woman on plane: Which car company do you work for?

Narrator: A major one."

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

You know what doesn't leak gas from fuel injectors onto hot engine surfaces?

EVs. Just saying.

And yes, I know, you'll show me videos of piece of shit Teslas catching fire, as if that makes such problems equal to something like this.

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago

Battery fires are significantly worse than combustion engine fires, that’s not unique to Teslas. I like EVs but let’s not pretend they’re fireproof.

[-] noxy@yiffit.net 10 points 6 months ago

They're also much less frequent.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sepulcher@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

Nobody is pretending they're fireproof.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

A gasoline fire can be put out with about a thousand gallons of water. A lithium battery in an electric car can take 3,000-5,000 gallons of water to put out. There have been cases of wrecked Teslas reigniting at scrap yards weeks after they were destroyed.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago

they gotta start taking the batteries out of them before scrapping them, probably with mandatory recycling. also hot take all cars should have a public transit and protected bike lane tax applied to them

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago

I think it already is supposed to be mandatory before crushing them.

Most wrecked cars generally get parted out before recycled/crushed and shredded. Taking the battery out is also a huge pita. That's what shouldn't be allowed. Batteries need to be much more easily replaceable than they are.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

You’d think we’d have a better solution for extinguishing this by now. Solid state batteries can’t get here fast enough.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

The same thing that makes lithium good for batteries also makes it good for burning for days at a time and reigniting randomly

[-] __dev@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

That's kinda true, in a sense that all batteries use a chemical reaction to generate electricity and a damaged battery can short and thus ignite arbitrarily. But there's lithium-based batteries like LiFePo₄ that burn significantly less intensely if at all; and there's lab-only chemistries that are non-flammable. So it's not really because of the lithium specifically that they burn so well.

[-] noxy@yiffit.net 7 points 6 months ago

If EV fires take 3-5x as much water to put out, but ICE vehicles catch fire 30x more often as EVs, is that really so bad?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Teslas are a bad example anyway.

EVs are definitely the way to go here... just not a fucking tesla.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rem26_art@fedia.io 15 points 6 months ago

ah yes. Ford and saving money and fires...

The article says that this is an extension of a recall from 2022 for the same problem, and that Ford says replacement parts are available, but its odd to me that they wouldn't just replace them. I guess we're still on risk calculation vs people freaking over a known reason that their car could catch on fire

[-] sepulcher@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes. Human lives are just another data point for these companies.

If it's cheaper to have people die than to make things safely, we all know what they're going to do.

The solution is to create penalties that outweigh the profits.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 months ago

GDI engines that need to run the fuel to the injectors at over 2,000 psi is just stupid. Using that much pressure for such a marginal gain in efficiency from other engines that only need like 50 psi.

2,000 psi is like a guarantee that at some point in that vehicles life there's going to be fuel leaks and problems. Ever see a firetruck shooting that giant stream of water from the end of its ladder? That's only 80 psi.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Direct injected cars are nothing new. Diesels run their injectors much higher than 2000psi for hundreds of thousands kilometers. Ford is just shit at engineering.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago

Don't try and bring diesel into this. They're pretty different. It also doesn't cause nearly the fire risk when they leak some fuel.

Also, they absolutely leak fuel. I've seen loads of diesels with fuel leaks (I drive a lot of diesels for work). But like I said, them leaking a bit isn't really a cause to sound the alarm bells for a fire, cause diesel fuel isn't a risk like that.

[-] Gingernate@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

High pressure side leaks? If a common rail diesel has a high pressure leak the engine will most likely shut down due to pressure loss.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 6 months ago

Not sure why you're downvoted. They can't open the injectors without enough pressure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gingernate@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

HD diesel engines run at 29k psi without issues

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] nulluser@programming.dev 14 points 6 months ago

Me (while reading about the "fix" in the article): That's just a Band-aid!

The article:

Michael Brooks, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Auto Safety, called Ford’s remedy for the fuel leaks a “Band-aid type recall” and said the company is trying to avoid the cost of repairing the fuel injectors.

Me: That's what I just said!

[-] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

This is why you don't buy Ford. Never buy a GM product, either.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago
[-] Cort@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

A Chrysler? How is that better?

[-] Magister@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

All Stellantis are grade B cars, like if you compare an Acer laptop with a Dell laptop.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The Stelvio and Giulia are really nice and surprisingly reliable, for what they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

"But remedy won't fix leaks."

That pretty much makes it not a fucking remedy!

[-] blazera@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Can we just recall all gas SUV's?

[-] dog_@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Now now, don’t leave out the Bobcat.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Do not buy American cars.

I honestly don't know the reason, but they have made hot garbage for over 2 decades.

The interiors look like prison cells and the QA is nonexistent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Does widdle baby American corporations need the bail out bottle?

Smells like no one changed the diaper after decades of the US auto industry sitting it's pants.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
270 points (99.6% liked)

News

23266 readers
4017 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS