411
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 143 points 6 months ago

Can he be put in jail please

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 65 points 6 months ago

I’d settle for a massive coronary.

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 37 points 6 months ago

I would really prefer to see him live a very long time in prison but with the judiciary refusing to do literally anything to this POS.. fuck it lets go hamburders

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Same. I hope he dies in a supermax, alone, pathetic, miserable, broken.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 6 months ago

I want to see his real hair

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Him getting that Phil Spector mugshot "what his head really looks like without cosmetic assistance" reveal would be so delightful.

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I'd love to see it too, but I'm pretty sure that between the the logistics of locking up a former President and the very apparent dementia there's going to be some kind of clemency. As long as he is permanently barred from political activity, is sentenced to some form of house arrest, and of course has to pay whatever restitution is required, I'd be okay with that.

[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What logistics? You put him in a jail. Works for other people. “What about secret service protection?” They can go there with him. They can go home at night though. If you worry about his safety, put him in his own personal prison on an abandoned military base. It worked for Rudolph Hess.

It’s only hard if you make it hard.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 6 points 6 months ago

House arrest is much too lenient for that man. I say this as someone who left their suburban property exactly once in the last 5 years.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 6 months ago

He really really needs to be tried. It's the only way we'll get past the "you can't indict a president" nonsense.

In some ways, I'd love to see Trump get into office January 20th at noon and then indicted by a federal grand jury at 1pm.

But the headache of him issuing a pardon to himself is not something we're ready for as a nation.

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee -3 points 6 months ago

poof, you have a massive coronary

[-] Kaput@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

I pledged to my kids that we would go back to Disney when Trump get sent to jail, I fell like my money's pretty safe, but I wouldn't going back to Disney.

[-] skulblaka@startrek.website 8 points 6 months ago

Please don't give Florida your tourism money

[-] Kaput@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I'm totally considering going to the California one due to the fascist Florida governor. But that is a lot more expensive to fly to. And I guess I could offset the moral dilemma, by pretending to be gay or wear a t-shirt saying I'm there to celebrate Trumps jail time.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 6 months ago

And gagged with a dirty sock

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 73 points 6 months ago

What's the point of a.gag order if it accomplishes literally nothing?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

Rules for us, not for them.

If us plebians did anything like what he's doing, we'd have been in jail the first time we violated the gag order.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe the second if the judge is nice. Trump is on strike... What, 5?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It's so damn many, I've lost count.

[-] baru@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

The judge isn't part of the gag order. Meaning, gag order doesn't limit what it said about the judge.

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

They might be soon tho, because judges generally don't like to be intimidated.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 73 points 6 months ago

If he does that 2 or 3 thousand more times the Judge might have to send him a VERY Stern Letter!

[-] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 10 points 6 months ago

Daniel Stern? Howard Stern?

[-] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 56 points 6 months ago

I hope the jurors are protected. I would not want to be a juror in this trial.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 23 points 6 months ago

The upside is that you'd get infinite book deals and speaking engagements... the downside is never ending death threats.

Yea, I'd probably urge any jurors to retain anonymity.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 6 months ago

Lucky that the jurors didn't have any opinions until the end of the trial, so hopefully that minimizes things to a spike of words, spread among 12-20 people.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, regardless of what the final decision is about a third of the country would...be less than happy with you. I figure it's at least even odds we get a hung jury just because of political polarization.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Punish him. Ffs.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 22 points 6 months ago
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 20 points 6 months ago

Yeah, that's still true. Those of us under the law are equal.

They are above the law... :(

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago

And others sit and wait Before the Law

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Deleted, put comment on wrong post lol.

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

What an absolute idiot.

Anything that comes from this will hit him even harder later on.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Seems to have been working so far though :-/

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Idk bout that, his main company lost their business license in NY, their real estate values plummeted and the Truth Social Stock is in a down spiral as well. He is facing a number of civil as well as one criminal suit and the majority of his format accolades has either been prosecuted, jumped back to Republican default values or has abandoned him.

Smells a bit like he's at wit's end, even though it took quite a while. I'm confident at least he won't be able to hide from consequences anymore. Time to clean him up together with all the glass shards he left behind.

[-] algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Aggressive words have lost all meaning. I'm pretty disappointed to see him not taking swings at anyone

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

It's irritating how often they use headlines like this when I wouldn't be surprised if he literally had a judge attacked physically

[-] Skkorm@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The American legal system is such a fucking joke

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
411 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19100 readers
4125 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS