154
Texas police are a lot more proactive in this case than they were in Uvalde.
There's money at stake here, not just worthless children's lives, you know. They know who pays their salaries, and it ain't 10 year old kids.
If they’re students, how are they trespassing?
Maybe the totalitarian automatic mass suspensions and expulsions are in effect the moment they say anything AIPAC wouldn't approve of?
I am kind of flabbergasted at how they did the suspensions. My school was no where near as nice as most of these schools and our school had a whole convoluted process for suspension. Assuming you didn't commit a violent crime, then you got at least two meetings with deans and one of them you had access to a student advocate, if you desired.
Yeah, they're being extremely authoritarian in their unthinking reactionary zeal. Literal fascist police state stuff 🤬
I would not be at all surprised if Texas law says that anyone can be declared a trespasser on property they don't own at any time.
Yeah. Faculty is probably allowed to shoot the students
So could the Police legally arrest peaceful protesters because non-students joined the protest?
I saw the anti-semitic b******* but if it's a peaceful protest in support of Palestine, it would seem really easy to sue the police over constitutional violations.
That's a big risk to take to violate a constitutional right.
TX DPS and APD have a long history of violating constitutional rights.
I can believe that. But you can still bring lawsuits against them, one's gotta stick according to sheer numbers. That's how change starts
Except the police don't suffer repercussions for those lawsuits. The taxpayers are the ones who pay them. The police union protects the cops and the police union never gets successfully sued.
Often they don't, sometimes they do.
Never trying because something is difficult is not the way to effect change.
I have honestly never heard of a successful lawsuit against a police union. I understand the 'always try' idea, but lawsuits cost money and there's the concept of throwing good money after bad. Maybe using that money to fight for reforms in the political arena would be a better idea?
Fighting back against constitutional violations is the epitome of advancing reform in a political arena in which those rights are being constantly eroded.
Fighting for the legitimacy of essential social and personal rights guaranteed to you by the constitution of your country is in no way a waste of resources.
But successful lawsuits don't make legal rulings on constitutional violations.
I'm not sure why you think that, but good news: lawsuits absolutely can result in rulings on constitutional violations.
Lawsuits are how citizens frequently address their constitutional violations.
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
154 points (94.8% liked)
News
23301 readers
1168 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS