Uh? It's like any other form of knowledge.
The way to learn it is to go directly to the complex part, fail spectacularly, and only then backstep into the requirements.
This is the way
Genuinely actually the way I do everything T-T
Typical back tracing algorithm when you don't know which path to take.
Like that, yeah. But you don't even get to know what paths exist before you start walking.
Chemists learn it without being taught linear algebra ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Here, you droppen an arm: \
With most markdown renderers you need to use ¯\\\_ (ツ)_/¯, first to escape the \ and then to escape the _ so it doesn't think you want italics with _ (ツ)_, but looks like Lemmy's is fine with ¯\\_ (ツ)\_/¯, go figure ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯
Me writing a machine learning thesis with the linear algebra knowledge that I completely forgot
Because you will suffer and then you will be corrupted by the demon of shortcutting and never really understanding anything. Yes, embrace the evil! Or resist the temptation and train your spirit (nothing trains the spirit better than abstract infinite vector spaces).
Harsh. Fairly factual.
Or understanding hermetian matrices See the bottom and the top, well there's some inverse and
I can assure you, we had to.
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
