67
submitted 5 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Skeleton_Erisma@hexbear.net 47 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Surely it can't be because we have a school to prison pipeline and our colleges are class division country clubs that are constantly being financially threatened to only research on war machines and oil industry

As well as pull, there has been a degree of push. Chinese scientists working abroad have been subject to increased suspicion in recent years. In 2018 America launched the China Initiative, a largely unsuccessful attempt to root out Chinese spies from industry and academia.

When the sinophobia blows up in your face like a Looney tunes contraption

the-doohickey frothingfash

The rise of Chinese science is a double-edged sword for Western governments. China’s science system is inextricably linked with its state and armed forces—many Chinese universities have labs explicitly working on defence and several have been accused of engaging in espionage or cyber-attacks

Lol said proudly as if westerners don't do that to make above mentioned war machines. Fuck off lmao

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

China’s science system is inextricably linked with its state and armed forces—many Chinese universities have labs explicitly working on defence

This is literally just a wiki page for the US

And this exists lmao. Two things I found in 30 seconds of searching

Absolutely clownish faux concern

[-] randomquery@hexbear.net 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There is a list composed by ASPI about the degrees of "danger" of chinese universities. I know that there are universities in europe that use this list to ban collaborations with chinese scholars.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 5 months ago

that's almost exclusively why the US universities still exist imo.. just to crank shit out for the state/military

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 33 points 5 months ago

i'm a media slop guy and have been working my way through an american show called ER, a fast-paced hospital procedural airing from 1994-2009 that arguably paved the way for that entire genre and the other shows that followed. because the costuming/uniforms of hospitals has not changed much over 30 years, the show operates in a strangly timeless frame. also, much of the backdrop (a publicly-funded hospital in southside Chicago facing constant austerity) is all too familiar.

however, over time the shifting perspectives of the "outside" periodically insert themselves into the show and betray very dated positioning that, in the context of the otherwise ageless stories and setting, is wildly jarring.

recently, i watched a few episodes that took the most insane swipes at "China" as understood by american network television writers and wherever "notes from above" (NBC/WB TV) come from. one plainly stated that, in 2005 (present day for the show), China had no trauma hospitals in the entire country. this was stated and played as a fact by a levelheaded and worldly character. another episode airing around the same time stated that China had no neonatal care, at all, in the entire country. to be clear, it did not imply that such care existed and was below standard... it stated frankly that it did not exist at all, in any form. i don't know that either statement would be true in 1949, let alone 50+ years after the revolution.

neither of these swipes had any necessary relation to any story/plot arc and, besides their absurdity, felt very much inserted to appease some force external to the show im sitting here in 2024, all too aware of how thoroughly the PRC has eclipsed the US in so many ways through a deliberate path to cultivating knowledge, listening to some actor seriously pretend like china in 2004 was stuck in 1944.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In fact, there are no babies at all in china. They were all killed during the one child program, and now everyone isn’t china is 93 years old

[-] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

there used to be one baby in all of china (one child policy, hello?), but they killed it too after they stopped the one child policy.

[-] davel@hexbear.net 18 points 5 months ago

State Dept. product placement 😂/😭

[-] jack@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago

ER was very closely linked with and directed by the White House and other elements of the US security apparatus.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 30 points 5 months ago

40% of Americans believe in climate change being a threat vs 70% of Chinese

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 27 points 5 months ago

70% is still surprisingly low.

[-] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

Honestly this is a great stat to throw at the libs to get them to realize that China isnt goolag 1984 propaganda 24/7

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

I guess that’s true, it just seems kinda low because I would think with all the flooding China has been getting more people would be taking climate change more seriously.

[-] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

No doubt it's disappointing.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 19 points 5 months ago

the other 60% are about to find out this summer and hurricane season.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

Where's the Chinese figure from?

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

death to The Economist, every nameless shithead hiding behind that masthead should be guiillotined

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 5 months ago

there was a time when i read the economist somewhat regularly... i almost even subscribed but i was annoyed with the repetitive CHINA WILL END THIS YEAR covers...

what a different time that was in my life

[-] emizeko@hexbear.net 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

yeah same here, some portion of my anger comes from having been deceived by them when I was fully plugged into the matrix

Here, then, is the problem with the magazine: readers are consistently given the impression, regardless of whether it is true, that unrestricted free market capitalism is a Thoroughly Good Thing, and that sensible and pragmatic British intellectuals have vouched for this position. The nuances are erased, reality is fudged, and The Economist helps its American readers pretend to have read books by telling them things that the books don’t actually say.

How The Economist Thinks | Current Affairs

[-] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago
[-] Mokey@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago

Ill probably unalive myself when the US inevitably bombs it all and ruins everything

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 5 months ago

maybe I'll be one of the lucky ones that dies in a bombing of a major imperial core city

[-] healthkick@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

but at what cost

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
67 points (100.0% liked)

news

23553 readers
877 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS