1453
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Tixanou@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

(this is not real obviously) artist: Soren Iverson

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 129 points 5 months ago

People with ADHD will never make it through an ad.

[-] bmsok@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago

This comment hit me like a gut punch of dread.

And now I'll think about it for years.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago

*Ad 1 of 3.

[-] grid11@lemy.nl 113 points 5 months ago
[-] a_postmodern_hat@lemmy.world 113 points 5 months ago

“Let’s work together and put an end to attention theft.”

[-] Leg@lemmy.world 77 points 5 months ago

The term "attention theft" is some dystopian shit, and just probable enough to make me vomit in my mouth.

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Attention theft is an existing term, though it's used to describe bad practices by marketers. I suppose it's bad that the term has had to come into existence, but it is good that it exists as a way to talk about bad practices more easily.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] groats_survivor@lemmy.world 98 points 5 months ago

I remember a time before YouTube...it sounds like I will be living that time again

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 43 points 5 months ago

When Vanced went down, and before ReVanced came out, I had stopped using YT. The ads are unbearable.
So I know what I'd do.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 24 points 5 months ago

Oh youtube was great. It went downhill super fast when people made money on youtube.

[-] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

That's why I watch YouTube with NewPipe on my phone and Firefox + uBlock origin on my laptop.

Btw NewPipe recently got an update that fixed all bugs I've ever noticed

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 78 points 5 months ago

How many people would be unable to use youtube because they have a broken camera or dont want youtube to access their camera

[-] hades@lemm.ee 52 points 5 months ago

They can always buy Premium for 299.95 per month.

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago

YouTube requires these permissions, please enable them to continue

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 5 months ago

it would just completely fail to recognize certain facial features, and there'd be jack shit people could do about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Imalostmerchant@lemmy.world 77 points 5 months ago
[-] Tixanou@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I found this on Twitter and didn't know who made it, but thanks! They're credited now :)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 69 points 5 months ago

Why track you when they can make you be unable to look away?

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 5 months ago

RESUME VIEWING RESUME VIEWING RESUME VIEWING

[-] Tja@programming.dev 16 points 5 months ago

Please drink a confirmation sip.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 63 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"There will now be a short questionnaire on the ad you watched to see if you actually listened to it. If you get below 90%, we will show two minutes of ads."

[-] broken_chatbot@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

A Russian video hosting Rutube (which was totally dead until the govt decided to detract Russians from using YouTube, which made the platform semi-dead) actually tried to do that, having a quiz after each ad break, asking questions such as "what TV channel has been advertised in this ad?" and repeating the ad video if answered wrong

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Don't give them even more ideas...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 53 points 5 months ago

Please don’t give them any ideas

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Sony literally has a patent on something very similar to this already lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xephonian@retrolemmy.com 51 points 5 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 5 months ago

I remember there being some Android phone (some generation of Samsung Galaxy S series probably) with a "feature" where it pauses video playback if you look away from it. Good thing it didn't catch on.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 5 months ago

See, I have no doubt they would if they could, but i doubt such things are actually feasible.

Like right now I just refresh the page to skip ads on my phone.

[-] onion@feddit.de 36 points 5 months ago
[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 44 points 5 months ago

Hell, phones have them built in. Your iPhone literally knows not to dim the screen if it can see that your eyes are looking at it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's entirely feasible.

Amazon had full head tracking, including gaze, in the Fire Phone a decade ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DBT@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

How to make me lose interest in whatever I was about to watch 101

[-] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

I can't be arsed to modify a gravestone with youtube logo on it, but that's what it would look like to me if they pulled that off.

Just bye, good luck.

I'm already surprised how people fell into the short content trap/addiction loop. That in itself was a eye opener for me to take a step back.

[-] Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 5 months ago

That's why I use Revanced. I can hide the shorts and news shelves. The former is disgustingly addictive and a massive waste of time, while the latter is plain Nazi propaganda at times.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 29 points 5 months ago

This will be the death of YouTube for me. I pay for YouTube premium so this day may never come for me.

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 38 points 5 months ago

That didn't keep Amazon from adding ads to the paid version of Prime and making a higher paid tier. How much easier is it for Google to implement the same?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

I pay for YouTube premium

Not as bad as paying for Twitter, but close.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Unrelated, but seeing "2025," my first thought was "haha that's so far in the future". Jesus, for something that's six months away, that's a futuristic ass sounding date

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 24 points 5 months ago

Just stick a photo of yourself on the camera

Our machine learning model found out that you were not actually listening to the ad. The ad will now repeat until you click it and buy the product.

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 22 points 5 months ago

Please drink Verification Can.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

People still running content blockers and piping video links in 2025: "You guys are still watching ads?"

[-] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 5 months ago

Here's how this is going to happen:

  1. Someone rolls out this technology, everyone of course, fucking hates it, especially since a lot of people have Youtube videos on for background noise.
  2. Someone else uses this tech for shock value, perhaps a company putting something horrific that people can't look away from as a misguided way to get the ad in people's heads.
  3. These incidents lead to either the US, EU or China getting up in arms and banning the tech.
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] praxis_jack@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Seems like what we're moving towards

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zink@programming.dev 18 points 5 months ago

Funny stuff, but in reality I hope they realize that if all the free users leave, that could get a lot of content creators to branch out, and they could also take the paid users with them.

I pay for premium because I watch YouTube all the time, multiple people in my house watch it on multiple devices, and we even get use out of YouTube music. It’s worth more to me than all other streaming services combined. But I’m there for all the creators and the content they put out, not for anything else unique about the YouTube experience. All they have on their side is install base, infrastructure cost, and inertia. Those are big things to overcome, but if they drive enough people away things could definitely change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

not real in 2025. 2040? not so sure

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago

They won't do this. They can't even force you to watch every ad. Reloading the video after the first ad plays will skip the rest of the ads.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
1453 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26948 readers
1522 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS