279
submitted 5 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] iopq@lemmy.world 144 points 5 months ago

What are they going to use? Firefox?

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 31 points 5 months ago

with ublock origin, yes

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 23 points 5 months ago

They saw how the cybertruck is super sharp and can cut you so they intend to use Edge.

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

They'll have to use some sort of mosaic.

[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

How would that possibly give them an edge?

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

They might have to explore more options

[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

You mean like a navigator?

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Not sure if they would gopher that

[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Damnit. This thread is become a real opera at this point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 106 points 5 months ago

As much as I appreciate that added bit of flash and glamour of chrome, the health problems from dealing with that shit are nassssssty. I also feel like the younger generations of purchasers are looking less for chrome than my generation.

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 54 points 5 months ago

It has another danger too, when it glints in the sunlight and blinds other drivers.

Chrome was always a bad idea.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago

Now we've got those stupidly bright headlights instead.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

The US feds recently approved automatically adjusting headlamps that point down at the road, so hopefully the current nonsense will get better. Europe has had these for a while.

[-] TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago

I’m in Europe and I still get blinded by modern SUVs with LED headlights constantly, having auto levelling headlights is nice and all but when the headlights themselves are at eye level for drivers in anything lower than a landrover it doesn’t change much

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 months ago

Do they work worth a damn? Auto-highbeams suck ass (one of the first things I disable) and turn high beams on in inappropriate conditions

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They’ve been here for a long time, the issue is is when someone replaces their old bulbs with those bulbs that require those special housings.

My head bulbs aren’t bright, HID/LED sound awesome

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

That's usually from misaligned headlights. Most often people swapping their headlight bulb and not adjusting them. You can't simply pop an HID bulb into the existing reflector housing without adjusting the headlight to compensate.

[-] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

To quibble, you can't pop a HID into a reflector housing at all, usually. Halogen and drop in replacement LED have a different focal point than HID bulbs do.

This means if switching to HIDs you also need to replace the entire housing so it will focus the light correctly. No amount of adjustment will be correct if the beam isn't focused properly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

It turns out, automakers were actually using headlights that were dimmer than legally required and getting away with it for decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

That has never really been a problem for me.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

A waxed car does the same… a window does the same… that’s literally not a reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

I’m 30, it’s not that I don’t want chrome, it’s more like I don’t care either way and I’m not paying more for it because I just don’t care about it

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Lol that is probably the real answer. The Young's don't like the look of it so they are not using it

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 51 points 5 months ago

When was the last time real chrome was on any of their cars? All chrome-like pieces on my old assed Jeep are shit assed plastic.

[-] toddestan@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Maybe the bumpers on some of the Ram trucks?

Any of the decorative chrome bits have been cheap plasti-chrome for something like 30 years now.

[-] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Even the trucks have chrome painted metal bumpers. Always thought it was too much

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 41 points 5 months ago

At least at one major auto maker, environmental and serious health concerns are outweighing its aesthetic appeal.

Are they going to stop making cars with huge front hoods which are hugely dangerous to pedestrians? Or stop marketing their cars as if they're meant to be driven dangerously?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago

At least at one major auto maker, environmental and serious health concerns are outweighing its aesthetic appeal.

Suuurree they are. Hasn't chromium getting more expensive over the past couple years? I'm guessing this sudden concern about the environment and the health of the workers will save them quite a bit of money in the long term.

Still, credit where credit is due, at least this cost cutting measure that actually has positive benefits for once.

[-] greenhorn@lemm.ee 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Here in Detroit, Stellantis just asked for their factory to be allowed to pollute more, despite neighbors pushing back at how much they already pollute.

[-] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago

Bingo, and California moving to outright ban chrome plating shops. It's all about money, always was.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is just like Apple and Samsung removing the charger from the cellphone box and claiming it's for the environment when in reality it's because now they can charge you $30+ more to buy one separately that comes in a second box.

Stellantis consistently builds some of the worst cars in the world and have been ignoring electrification for too long. They have a dim future once the Charger/Challenger are gone and this is just a cheap trick to attempt to revise their image.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago

They really should make polished aluminum a thing. It's so hot looking if you take care of it.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

What exactly is involved in taking care of it?

If it involves more than a couple trips through the automatic car wash a year I'd personally rather just forego the shiny bits altogether.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago

You usually need to buff it because calcium builds up on it. If your in the states eighteen wheelers gas tanks are usually made of aluminum and they pay good money to get them polished.

[-] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Or acid wash whitens them, but I don't like that look, since it isn't mirror finish.

[-] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

That's very surprising to me, I'd always assumed tankers were stainless steel. Do they have to have a lining inside?

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They would have to now days. I don't t think they originally did. My understanding is the stainless steel ones rust quickly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vengefu1Tuna@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

It's also very expensive compared to other finish options like plating or different types of paint. I would be surprised if price wasn't also a factor.

(source: I used to work in metal fabrication)

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

I would be surprised if price wasn't the only factor and they're just talking about employees' health for PR reasons

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 months ago

Will they use Firefox?

Never mind the hazards of producing it; It's fucking annoying to look at while the sun it out.

I live in Arizona, so double fuck me.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

My wife and I went on a road trip for the 2017 eclipse. At one point she was driving around and I was goofing around in the passenger seat with our eclipse glasses.

Couldn't see shit through them, I could see the sun, maybe just barely the vague outlines of certain big things off the side of the road if they were in full sun

I could absolutely see the sun glinting off of every bit of chrome on cars that drove past though. Couldn't see the cars themselves, just a brief little flash of light.

Kind of made me wonder what kind of cumulative eye damage you might get from millions of small flashes from chrome bits on cars over your lifetime. It could very well be negligible, I'm certainly no eye doctor.

My wife and I went to see the eclipse (it as our honey moon, literally) a few months ago and I had an identical experience xD

"Holy shit, are these laser-beams of sun cutting across the back of my eyeballs all the time?"

Mind you, it's anything shiny, not just chrome, but why add to the problem?

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Chrome doesn't really look good on late model cars anyway

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
279 points (98.6% liked)

News

23376 readers
1764 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS