281
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
  • Xi Jinping accused the US of trying to trick China into invading Taiwan, the Financial Times said.
  • The Chinese leader made the claim to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, per the FT.
  • One expert told BI it's a sign that China is "genuinely surprised" by the attitude of US officials.

For decades, the US has adopted "strategic ambiguity" toward Taiwan, positioning itself as the country's most steadfast ally, while declining to explicitly say whether it would come to Taiwan's aid if China attacked.

But the mood in Washington, DC, seems to be shifting, with Congress showing itself more "overtly supportive of Taiwan than only a few years ago," Graeme Thompson, an analyst with the Eurasia Group, told Business Insider in November.

"The US has plenty of public figures now talking of Taiwan like it is a new Ukraine, and some even saying it needs to be diplomatically recognized," Brown added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 138 points 5 months ago

Oh no. Xi saw through our dastardly reverse psychology. Now we have no choice but to watch him not invade our ally. How horrific.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

And the Russians where also very vocal about not invading Ukraine right up to the moment that they did. So what I'm trying to say is "talk is cheap".

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

I have a spare deck of UNO cards, should the US require them for a strategic response.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 77 points 5 months ago

You show America, Pooh Bear! Pledge to never attack Taiwan! Really show them by recognizing its sovereignty and normalizing trade relations!

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"Taiwan is its own state, and should remain so in perpetuity. China will be their shoreline supporters! --Xi"

submit

"Yeah, that'll show them." Said Xi as he sat back with satisfaction and dipped his hand into a jar of honey.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I've been saying for months that he should reclaim Upper Manchuria or Northern Manchuria. Don't remember what it was called till Russia invaded in 1901. That would give him the military victory he's looking for, and it's not like anyone is gonna complain about Russia being weakened by losing its only warm water Pacific port. It's currently called Vladivostok

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't think he believes what he says for the reasons hes claiming. I think if he's really set on not invading it's because hes seen how poorly its working for Russia. China wants Taiwans economy, you cant get that if Taiwan looks like Ukraine before you even get control.

If Xi is being serious it's probably because he's realizing he needs to take Taiwan through economic and diplomatic, and probably clandestine diplomatic means. Weather he has a plan for that remains to be seen.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

Given Russia's performance in Ukraine, Iran firing 5% of its total stockpile at Israel and having almost nothing get through modern American air defense, and China's own review of military readiness that showed glaring flaws and corruption, any plans China may have had to invade Taiwan should be postponed indefinitely.

Turning local elections in Taiwan in China's favor in the long term seems like the more viable alternative for reunification.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago

True, even without reunification (what's for?), China gets more by economical means than it would ever has via invasion. It's insane production capacity, belt&road schemes, education and science are a caricature of a suntzian wise guy who wins a war without a battle. Reducing themselves to a war (and probably destroying everything they are jealous of in Taiwan in the process) would be embarassingly stupid. I watch their sabblerattling as a play, but I'm yet to see any benefit from it besides upkeeping the status of those not to fuck with.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

My thoughts exactly. Probably tougher than HK but similar playbook, my guess is a slow long term approach would be the most likely to succeed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

he’s realizing he needs to take Taiwan through economic and diplomatic, and probably clandestine diplomatic means

Add in psyops programs. They have been a resounding success against UK and the US for Putin.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

He’ll take it through political means, by running candidates that support his regime. Then he will put an end to democracy there. Kind of like Hong Kong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago

A) You can't "invade" something you already possess... is how he will spin it when he tries to invade.

B) Didn't Putin say the same thing about Ukraine?

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 43 points 5 months ago

Feb. 12 – After another unfruitful phone call between Biden and Putin, U.S. officials warned that a Russian attack on Ukraine could come at any time. A Kremlin aide accused the West of creating “hysteria.” “The Americans are artificially inflating the hysteria around the so-called planned Russian invasion,” Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters after the call between Biden and Putin. “The preconditions for possible provocative actions of the Ukrainian armed forces are being created alongside these allegations.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/02/russian-rhetoric-ahead-of-attack-against-ukraine-deny-deflect-mislead/

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

It's like a word for word replay.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I remember Hasan saying "Russia won't invade, this is just the US manufacturing consent" the week before Russia invaded. Then right after they invaded it was all "it was only a matter of time, and here's why it's NATO's fault." It's almost like their "material analysis" is just retrospective bullshit lol

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Hey, that's the same excuse cops use for committing war crimes on their own citizens.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

while declining to explicitly say whether it would come to Taiwan's aid if China attacked.

“You didn’t want to get involved in the Ukraine conflict militarily for obvious reasons,” a reporter said to Mr. Biden. “Are you willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if it comes to that?”

“Yes,” Mr. Biden answered flatly.

“You are?” the reporter followed up.

“That’s the commitment we made,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/23/world/asia/biden-taiwan-china.html

Sounds more like someone came to their senses but tries to save face....hopefully. You never know if this is just a strategic move to make others believe they won't attack.

[-] Frokke@lemmings.world 31 points 5 months ago

So this means invasion in sept? If we were to follow what happened in Ukraine?

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 26 points 5 months ago

I'm imagining Netanyahu, Xi and Putin having their own IM group where they share these blurbs and react with emojis. "Check out what I'll publish lol"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

As absurd as it seems sometimes, the One China policy has kept the peace for decades. I wouldn’t toss it out without a very, very good reason.

I mean, to people under 50ish, Taiwan is a stable, functioning democracy with an advanced economy but that didn’t really happen until 1987. It was basically a fascistic military dictatorship prior to that. It’s a much more complicated history than we sometimes acknowledge. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Taiwan_(1945%E2%80%93present)

I’m an elder millennial, I guess, and I was alive but too young to remember Taiwan’s first real elections. I get that the One China policy might feel like a relic of a bygone era since I know it from history books too. But most world leaders are old enough to remember when Taiwan was a dysfunctional, fascistic military dictatorship. It might require another few generations of peace before it’s fully consolidated.

I mean, to put it in perspective, Robocop, Lethal Weapon, and Predator came out in 1987. People old enough to see those movies in theaters remember a different era and likely have a fundamentally different understanding of Taiwan/Mainland relations. Xi, Biden, and Trump are all over 70.

[-] Isthisreddit@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Bro, Trump doesn't know shit about anything. Xi and Biden though know very well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

We need to stop acknowledging the one China policy. China is threatening war against Taiwan, and there should be absolutely zero doubt that we don't condone Chinese aggression towards Taiwan.
EU and other allies should of course not support it either.

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

"Once China" sounds like a good policy :D

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I have no idea how that happened, but it's corrected now.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

I mean China can't really do anything about the autonomous mainland provinces steadfastly refusing to declare independence, even if you can find precedent of a sovereign state kicking out its provinces unilaterally it'd still be a dick move.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What? I have no idea where that came from? The One China policy is about reuniting Taiwan with mainland China.

In principle I don't mind that China wants Taiwan to reunite with China, as long as they are perfectly peaceful about it, like with Germany and Est Germany.

But what are you talking about?

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The one China policy is first and foremost about the principle that there is only one China. Hence the name: That the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China are still locked in a civil war, that neither declared independence from the other. There is no "reuniting" because you cannot unite what is not split, they're still one.

Which is a rather different situation from divided Germany: The East declared independence as a new state, and the West accepted it. The West still considered Eastern citizens who made their way across the border her own citizens, but there was no "you can't have your own sovereign state" stuff going on, from either side. Upon reunification the East re-introduced its federal states, which then jointly but individually joined the West, leaving the East without territory and people which thus vanished in a puff of how international law defines the concept of a state.

The Mainland could pull an East Germany and declare independence at any time, Taipei would accept it. Some old-guard Kuomintang would gripe but they'd get over it. Taipei declaring independence makes no sense... independence from whom? Imperial China? They won that struggle before the PRC even existed. It's the PRC which is rebel faction in the civil war, you don't declare independence from rebels if then you grant them independence and, well, the rebels don't want independence.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

They're making a "Taiwan is actually China" joke. Referring to the mainland as "provinces that refuse to declare independence"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 5 months ago

Of course the only reason you use the term invasion is if the place is outside the borders of your country. Funny.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Tbh, it's not. For example I could say I was gonna invade your wife later today

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Thank goodness.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Xi taking a page out of the abusive husband playbook, I see.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago

He knows China doesn't have the capability to invade Taiwan, but needs to save face. So... the evil foreigners are trying to trick us, but I'm too smart to fall for their tricks!

Fascist propaganda 101, always blame the foreigners for everything.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He knows China doesn’t have the capability to invade Taiwan

Large scale ground invasions are generally a losing game.

But the Chinese strategy towards Taiwan has always been the same strategy as Hong Kong, Tibet, and Mongolia. Become economically invaluable and set policy through soft power.

The only real incentive to send in ground troops would be to respond to a Cuba Missile style escalation. And it no longer looks like the Americans are interested in installing short range missiles on the island, now that they have exhausted themselves arming Ukraine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ik5pvx@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Ok. He's copying putain. We are doomed

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 8 points 5 months ago

So far, he's being smarter than monkey putin.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

This doesn't mean we should stop deterrence

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Well this probably means he'll invade, so yes.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

"US is making me do it"

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Whatever keeps his ass out of the sling

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

This is like Saul Goodman levels of bullshit

[-] darthsid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Now we need a report saying the same for the Russians in Ukraine

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

It's not a trap, because they were warned beforehand about what would happen if you did it. It's a dare, like in "Jackass!".

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Chinese leader Xi Jinping has accused the US of trying to trick China into invading Taiwan, but he said it won't take the bait, the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

According to the FT, Xi made the accusation during a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in April last year.

Xi has issued the same warning to officials in his own country, one source told the FT, but this would be the first time he made the claim to a foreign leader, the outlet said.

But the mood in Washington, DC, seems to be shifting, with Congress showing itself more "overtly supportive of Taiwan than only a few years ago," Graeme Thomson, an analyst with the Eurasia Group, told BI in November.

Last month, a US congressional delegation met with senior Taiwanese officials to discuss US-Taiwan relations, a few days after China conducted military drills around the island.

During a meeting in April, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi warned US Secretary of State Antony Blinken not to cross China's "red lines" on sovereignty, security, and development interests.


The original article contains 555 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago

We're not starting WWIII over TSMC and nVidia's stock price.

Shit, most of the world won't even recognise Taiwan as a country. I can hardly see Haiti, Paraguay and the Vatican coming to the rescue.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

pfft no, but we will fulfill our treaty obligations to the 24 million people who don't deserve china's bullshit.

TSMC has kill switches installed already. China would only get a pile of slag if they tried it. and they won't.

What China should do is reassess the Treaty of Aigun - does it still really apply, considering today's russians are neither the soviet block nor the russian empire? The areas in question are overwhelmingly asian in demographics. There's a whole lot of resources up there just sitting around because russia's never been able to chew bubble gum and walk at the same time, much less persecute a pointless, losing war while exploiting it's own resources.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
281 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39129 readers
868 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS