703
fin (fedia.io)
submitted 4 months ago by downpunxx@fedia.io to c/memes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 130 points 4 months ago

No way she didn't spend thousands of dollars on that fucking game.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 64 points 4 months ago

If true they wouldn’t have pointed her to another game. Whales are the entire business strategy.

[-] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago

Adding thousands of levels for 1 whale is unlikely to be profitable. That's a lot of development cost for content that likely won't be seen. Pointing to other games by the same studio is a much better idea if you can get them to make the transition.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Candy Crush Saga now has nearly 17,000 levels in it, so you’d be very wrong about that. Your average player might get into the hundreds, above average maybe thousands, but 17,000? They’re fishing for whales and not even that many of them.

This problem is way worse than people think and most mobile games on the store have the sole entire purpose of only hooking a small handful of whales. Then once they do, they mold entire games around just a few people. These companies that run apps like Candy Crush actively change the price of lives per player and watch the statistics of what they’re buying and when. It’s so sinister and the entire industry survives off of gaming addictions and whaling.

[-] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I mean you're not entirely wrong, but you're a little wrong. Just because they added levels later doesn't mean you were correct... These games have road maps, and they don't quickly change gears. There's math and analytics that go into all of it.

I think you're stretching when you say "around a few people". There's more money in 10,000 people spending a bit than 10 spending a ton. It's a gradient. The top 10 spend a lot, but not enough to morph your road map for. Especially when the companies own multiple properties. Better to get them transitioned to a new game within your umbrella than disrupt the entire content road map.

There's also far worse stuff than that and way harsher criticisms. You're getting closer with the "changing the prices" bit, but it's even worse than that, imo.

It's the reason I left working at one of them as a data analyst. I'm not speaking in generalities or that interested in debating here... I know precisely how the calculations for these types of things are done because I used to be on the team that did them.

Not this game, but a different one. The whole industry operates very similarly.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I really wanted to prove myself wrong because you sound like you know what you’re talking about. So I went and looked it up, turns out I was right to say what I said. Most of the major games out there report that more than half of their revenue comes from whales and those whales make up around 5% of their paying playerbase, sometimes more sometimes less. And in some games, that revenue is 60-70% of the total.

So that’s why there are 17,000 levels which that vast majority of players wont ever see. It’s because they’re chasing 5% or less of their audience.

But when it comes to games that are much smaller, I wasn’t really exaggerating to say that a small handful of players can outspend everyone else. When you have a player base in the hundreds and there’s like 20 people spending 50% or more in revenue for you, it’s going to affect your road map. In a larger game though, that percent will still mean tens of thousands of whale players.

And maybe your experience was different, maybe the games you worked on didn’t operate that way. But the industry absolutely does. It doesn’t mean you can ignore the 50% of revenue coming from regular players by the way, I’m just saying that the percent that spends enormously has almost the same weight in changing the games road map as the majority of players sometimes. Which is crazy to me.

Here’s the relevant Reddit post that was one of the sources I found.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

They would have recommended her to play other games they make with the same ad mechanics.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Talking through experience right? I've been playing for around 5 years and I'm only at level 3778. Never spent a single dollar on it.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I think I got to 400 and gave up. This post says all 4k in under a year. There's no way anyone can play free and do that. Unless they're literally a CC savant, and even then, I doubt it.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I don't think any amount of skill can get you there for free. The game is literally programmed to get harder and harder until you wait 24h or pay some money (after which point it will actually make itself easier than normal for a while to give you that dopamine hit and train you like pavlovs dog) The game does have impossible configurations and you'd run up against those regardless of skill.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I think you're right. Never really read the "in under a year" part.

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 102 points 4 months ago

Bragging that your mom spent $1000s of dollars on a mobile game.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago

Mom has expendable cash and is literally the best at something... Don't be too jelly now lol.

Vs half of Lemmy spending thousands of dollars on a rig that plays Stardew Valley...

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 15 points 4 months ago

Hey, it plays Crusader Kings III too

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

"spending thousands of dollars and millions of man hours installing and configuring Arch Linux on a rig that plays Stardew Valley…"

FIFY

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I was ready to be insulted, but then I remembered that I bought a whole ass Steam Deck and I've pretty much used it as a Binding of Isaac machine.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

My PC is purpose built for VR, I have a Quest 3 and what do I do most of the time?

Just sit in a cool looking room in VR chat and listen to music while browsing Lemmy or watching videos. Occasionally I'll play a flat space game in VR so I can have a huge screen. But I mean... I am using the VR technically.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I started playing might and magic 9 on my steam deck, shit so old it could run on a game boy, talk about overkill

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That game isn't pay to win and filled with dark patterns though.

Candy crush is mobile cancer.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 months ago

If it were a game that didn't use a pay to play/continue/win model, I'd agree that she was the best at it. Or at least played it the most. It's hard to say she's the best when you have to spend money to do it and you aren't playing against anyone.

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

If a better game comes out, we'll play that.

... then come back to SDV.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Hardware and software are not comparable.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Well it's great that they're compared, constantly and regularly.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

I'm at level 3000ish and played on and off for 5 years. Never spent a dime on the game.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 27 points 4 months ago

They said she did it in less than a year.

[-] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago

Well that's $1000 well spent if she found joy and entertainment and even something like success by being the number one worldwide in this game. I've seen much more stupider Guinness world records. And much more stupider ways to spend money.

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Not necessarily. I've beat several thousand levels of a similar game (because I've trained my brain that playing it means it's sleep time and now it knocks me out) and haven't spent a dime.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 81 points 4 months ago

Candy crush now has 15,000 levels. Good luck keeping up with that.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 24 points 4 months ago

I hate that that's true. And that you know it.

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 13 points 4 months ago

To be fair I had to search how many levels. I would never have guessed it was that high.

[-] readthemessage@lemmy.eco.br 18 points 4 months ago

I mean, considering she had finished 4k by 2018, that is totally doable

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Yea, they will keep making more I'm sure.

[-] match@pawb.social 10 points 4 months ago

as long as this mom keeps playing they must keep making levels

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Could they not add some level generation?

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 months ago

Is there more variations to even generate past 4k levels??
(Disclaimer idk what the levels look like beyond matching gems)

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

There are six colors of standard candy. A 3*3 grid has over 10 million combinations.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago

Semi-related factoid: every time you shuffle a deck of cards, it is EXTREMELY LIKELY the deck has never in existence been arranged the same way.

[-] clickyello@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

a factoid is something that is commonly believed to be true but isn't, which I guess this kinda is because it's not just extremely likely. there is a 1/80658175170943878571660636856403766975289505440883277824000000000000 chance that it's been arranged that way before. 52!

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Ahhhh I’ve been ignorant about the definition of factoid!

Also I read your post as if you had exclaimed at the end: FIFTY TWO

[-] clickyello@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

haha that's what I was thinking when I typed it tbh, also the meaning of factoid has changed but was originally meant as I had claimed, see my other comment if you want the context :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Well, not all of those combinations are playable

[-] maniii@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Unless you spent 1000s of dollars buying saucers and hammers and lollipops or something garbage that lets you finish without actually playing.

I hate these "gatcha" gaming nonsense where you pay-to-win.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

There's a level limit? I assumed they were algorithmically created.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

definitely pathological

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

This is a flex??? Lol

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Now do a speed run.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
703 points (96.6% liked)

memes

10315 readers
1132 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS