87
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

No, JD Vance did not have sex with a couch

Sounds like something some one who had sex with a couch would say.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 16 points 1 month ago

Technically it wasn't sex.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

That was what he said. To get out of child support payments.

Those poor little footstools are gonna have a hard life when they become chase lounges.

Especially because they’re ugly.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Won’t someone think of the ottoman?

[-] kometes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The eyeliner helps though.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Ok, raped a couch. I doubt it could consent.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 59 points 1 month ago

Title is misleading. A better title would be, “No JD Vance did not write about having sex with a couch in his memoir.”

For all we know, he may have fucked a plethora of furniture that did not make it into his memoir.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago
[-] aviationeast@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago
[-] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago

It does seem like an oddly specific denial.

[-] LordTrychon@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

With how it's worded, it could even imply that he did reach completion, just that he was too selfish to help the couch get there.

[-] LordTrychon@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

And the next sentence is 'That is a lie.'

Is this calling the claim of his bad couch loving a lie, or his previous sentence where he denied it?

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

No, JD Vance did not fuck a couch.

A couch fucked JD Vance. There's not a chance in hell he's the pitcher.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Headlines from our current era that would totally baffle people just 10/20/30 years ago.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Naw. They’ve already come across rule 34.

They’ll just assume we’re freaks, like everyone else

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A searchable PDF of the memoir includes 10 mentions of the word “couch” or “couches,” ...But at no point in his memoir does Vance write about performing sex acts on a couch

AP: "We're not actually reading that garbage but Ctrl+F find nothing."

An Associated Press reporter reviewed pages 179 to 181 in a physical copy

"Ok,we read 3 pages."

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

“AP… did you eat your vegetables?”

“Oh? Oh Really? Well how many did you eat?”

“No. I mean eat. Not just pushed around the plate…”

“That’s it. No more couch fuckin’ til you’ve finished your corn!”

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 25 points 1 month ago

Whoever Harris picks for veep, I'd like to see an ad of them saying "I believe JD Vance when he says he never had sex with his couch."

[-] kurwa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I don't think it was even his, he apparently did it in a store...

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Because it was actually a loveseat.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

True is it was a futon... But since futons can "transform" JD could never admit to sleeping with something "trans"

[-] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

You win the internet today 1000%.

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago

This is so fucking funny.

When the main discourse around your new running mate is whether or not he fucked a couch, you did not pick a strong candidate. Trumps gotta be pissed.

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

People are saying he did have sex with a couch.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

When you have to explain it...

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Narrator voice: "He did."

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think you have to write "JD Vance did not have sex with a couch once" or else it's potentially libel.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Are you sure? Lots of people are saying he did. Lots.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

My wife told me that story and I instantly went "That sounds fake, why would he admit that in a book?"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It wouldn’t have been the weirdest confession in a book.

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Hey, we're just asking questions.

[-] crawancon@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

I heard it was non consensual.

check the cushions for eye liner.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

Is that a codeword for Peter Thiel?

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I mean can anyone prove he didn't or hasn't?

[-] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 7 points 1 month ago

I believe the preferred nomenclature is couch botherer

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Step-couch what are you doing?

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

This story did not go through our standard editing process and has been removed.

It seems AP are cowards. They've removed the article.

[-] dfecht@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

They probably received a damning statement from the couch.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

No it's funnier - they factually don't know if he did or not. They can, however, factually claim that he didn't write it in his book.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Devon Nunez cow had to get involved.

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

He's a couchfucker

[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 month ago

Eh, whether he wrote about it in his book or not he totally has the look of a couch humper. I would also guess he likes to pee in the bathtub. I mean just look at him.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Everyone keeps saying JD fucked the couch but I know the true story... JD got raw dogged by the couch. Let's just say, calling him a tight ass is no longer literal.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe not, but it's out there apparently and the Internet is fueled by <60 second attention spans.

[-] MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Not within the last five years, anyway.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Reminds me that Zelensky's initial cause of popularity (the one that got him in the show casting him as the president of Ukraine) was from a 'Ukraine's got talent' like show where he played the piano with his penis.

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Bro he made the cushion look like the left side of that flag.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
87 points (85.4% liked)

politics

18789 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS