159
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Neurologist@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

If you’re confused: Birds are dinosaurs, crocodiles aren’t; note the “closest living relatives”

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dogsoahC@lemm.ee 37 points 3 months ago

Though, isn't being part of a group the closest you can get in terms of relatedness?

[-] teletext@reddthat.com 33 points 3 months ago

Yeah, it's like being related to your family. Most people would consider your relatives to be related to you.

[-] Neurologist@mander.xyz 19 points 3 months ago

Are octopus related to octopus? I mean technically they’re 100% related, but also they aren’t related as related implies not being. Depends on your interpretation.

[-] mihnt@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Are you saying octopus are all incest babies? Scandalous.

[-] Neurologist@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago

Ah sorry, the genome of octopus’ mating is only 99.99 something % similar. Not 100%. Rounding reflex.

[-] propter_hog@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

Agreed. Who shaves the barber? That paradox led to more stringent definitions for set theory.

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

Most people would consider your relatives to be related to you.

Really makes you think.

[-] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 months ago

Am I my closest relative?

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

"Brother, am I not your relative?"

silently dies

[-] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 7 points 3 months ago

I actually just learned this recently, but dinosaurs differ from reptiles in that dinosaurs have legs that are under their bodies whereas reptiles have legs that splay out to the side. So all mammals, and birds, with legs directly under their bodies are probably more closely related to dinosaurs then reptiles.

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No. Tetrapods and reptiles diverge well before dinosaurs. All dinosaurs are diapsids as compared to mammals, which are synapsids. A dimetrodon (the one with the big sail) is not actually a dino and is more closely related to humans than it is to dinos.

To expand on this concept, all dinosaurs and humans are technically considered bony-fishes as they are nested within the bony-fishes clade, osteoicthyes, but thats probably spelled wrong (this recently was used as a way of protecting some types of animals in a law that is supposed to protect fish as a category), and all birds are technically dinos, so when we refer to non-avian dinos, it just means dinosaurs excluding the birds!

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 5 points 3 months ago

Forgive my ignorance on the subject, but huh?

Clearly I missed a briefing somewhere. I thought that crocodiles were from that era, or is that the joke that I'm somehow missing?

[-] teletext@reddthat.com 33 points 3 months ago

The joke is that birds aren't only related to dinos, but are dinos themselves.

[-] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 months ago
[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It might be easy to brush off my complaint as a case of paleo-pedantry, but word choice matters. "Dinosaur" is a word for a specific group of creatures united by shared characteristics and which had their own evolutionary history—it is not a catch-all term for anything reptilian and prehistoric.

We have known about this distinction for a long time, and I bet that your average 10-year old paleo fan would know not confuse the groups.

https://xkcd.com/2501/

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 4 points 3 months ago

So, it's a joke about the fact that both are essentially dinosaurs?

.. nope, I got nothing ..

[-] RandomStickman@kbin.run 13 points 3 months ago

Here's my take:

Low IQ: crosc looks like dinos so they are the cloests living relative to dinos. Mid IQ: birds are direct descendents of dinos so they are the closest living relatives to dinos. High IQ: since birds are direct descendent they are just dinos, not a relative. Which makes crocs the next closest living relative to dinos/birds.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

No, the joke is that crocodiles aren't dinosaurs despite looking like them and being around at the same time, just closely related, while birds technically are dinosaurs, just not the big lizards of 64 million years ago.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 0 points 3 months ago

So really, this is not a joke about dinosaurs at all, it's a statistics joke .. which would put this meme in the wrong community 😇

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

No, it's a joke about dinosaur taxonomy. A statistics joke would still fit though, this is science memes, not dinosaur memes.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 3 months ago

I was making a joke about statistics not being science, but it's clear that not everyone got the joke .. pretty much the same as the original meme.

(This is humour, laugh.)

[-] propter_hog@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Statistics is maths, and maths is science insofar that you can't do science without doing maths. And I'd further argue that statistics is perhaps one of the three most important branches of maths to science, the other two being linear algebra and calculus. Also, it's been established previously that maths jokes are definitely welcome here.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
159 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
2980 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS