116
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by that_leaflet@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 192 points 3 months ago

I have to admit, I really don't like this. The old logo looked pretty neat and the "://" part was a stroke of genius.

[-] clb92@feddit.dk 88 points 3 months ago

The moz://a logo is really genius. I wonder if their current leadership is so incompetent that they don't even understand the :// part of the logo...

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 months ago

I think that question can be answered by the recent horrible series of decisions by them. Mozilla really has been captured by the roots of enshittification at this point.

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.org 59 points 3 months ago

They even implemented it in Firefox: moz://a redirects to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/

[-] Dremor@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

As will any moz://

[-] moonlight@fedia.io 38 points 3 months ago

I 100% agree. I don't mind design refreshes. I think I'm in the minority of loving the current Firefox logo.

But this just sucks. They really took their unique, clever wordmark logo (but still very modern and minimal!) and replaced it with a bland, trendy 2022 typeface.

I know this is super petty, but this might convince me to find another password manager and method for syncing tabs. Might try librewolf, too. Rebranding invites users to re-evaluate their view on a brand, and mine isn't changing for the better.

[-] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I remember the first time I saw the :// thing I felt myself having a little design-gasm.
This doesn't touch the same spot for me...

[-] clb92@feddit.dk 67 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The new logo sort of looks like a white flag. It symbolizes the fact that Mozilla has just completely given up by now.

[-] ramenu@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago

The flag looks a bit like a disgruntled goose.

[-] m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

I mean, if the intention is to reflect the utterly bad decisions Mozilla has made, this new logo would be spot on

[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 32 points 3 months ago

Ew the new one sucks. Why can't they spend the money that they have on important stuff instead of changing logos every couple of years? Uk, considering that their funding is going to dry up because of the Google anti trust case?

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago

Because they don't have money

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Why do companies constantly feel an urge to update their logos? I see this as marketing teams needing to show they are doing something so they come up with a "project" and then convince the management it's necessary...

[-] doodledup@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Nobody needs marketing people.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Because the CEO is probably having an existential dread crisis and needs to do something about it. So he fucks up the logo because he can, and fuck you. Now watch Mozilla ads from their newly acquired Ad company.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago

The font doesn't look too good

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 6 points 3 months ago
[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 months ago

and not Zilla Slab (which even had an opentype feature to replace “Mozilla” with “Moz://a”)

[-] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

I do like the new logo, but it is a bit sad to see the :// gone.

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Coincidentaly :/ is the symbol for "a bit sad"

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago

Am I the only one who only sees a pitch black image?

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure it's black on transparent. Not the most visible, especially if your client makes the background black.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

I switched to light mode to take a look at it and now I can confirm it looks absolutely terrible.

[-] VonReposti@feddit.dk 10 points 3 months ago

Can confirm, it looked better as a pitch black blob.

Ugh. Requiring your users enable light mode to look at an image is just cruel and unusual punishment...

[-] v9CYKjLeia10dZpz88iU@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago
[-] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You, my friend, are a truly unsung hero. ❤️

Also, damn, that's an ugly logo...

[-] muhyb@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

As a calligrapher, this is not pleasing to look at. Far from it.

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

As not a calligrapher, I agree.

[-] harl3k1n@feddit.org 11 points 3 months ago

Nope. I mean I don't really care. But it definitely doesn't appeal to me.

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 11 points 3 months ago

Does the flag look like a chicken to anyone else?

[-] Jilanico@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

It's probably supposed to be a Godzilla-like creature.

[-] data1701d@startrek.website 15 points 3 months ago

He's back from the dead!

[-] halm@leminal.space 10 points 3 months ago

My thoughts exactly. It's an underwhelming throwback in exchange for the pretty clever moz://a pun.

[-] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago

Thanks, now I can’t unsee it.

TBH, it’s better as a chicken

[-] zecg@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Fuck you, Mozilla, it's uglier and tells less about your core product, which is also the only thing you have that makes people tolerate your other stupid decisions.

[-] zecg@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Also, fuck your "a" in that font. I'd punch that fucking glyph in the face if it spoke to me on the street.

[-] xryx@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

I'm right there with you. Although I might not wait for that glyph to speak 😜

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Also hier soll das neue eingebettet sein

Und das ist das alte

Das neue ist hässlich

[-] moontorchy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

What other problems left to solve? Right, let's change the logo.

[-] mygoodsir@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Great sign that organizational resources are being arranged into a pointless circlejerk safely removed from browser & Thunderbird development, or finding opportunities to monetize that aren't products nobody asked for outside the nonprofit corporate bureacracy

[-] ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

Should've used Papyrus

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

I feel like we were just getting used to the old new logo?

It's possible this new logo is only for using next to other brands.

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago

What a complete waste of everybodys time.

[-] owiseedoubleyou@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

The only REAL Mozilla logo

[-] mandip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

The flag looks like Nepal's flag.

[-] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

Why did they copy i3?

[-] Mixel@szmer.info 1 points 3 months ago

Is that last resort of mozilla foundation. That is futile. Every new update from then enshitify firefox also if google won't be able to pay browser owners to be default search engine, mozzila will drown without that money.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
116 points (93.9% liked)

Linux

48366 readers
689 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS