Talk is cheap. I'll believe it when I see it.
Conservatives will say absolutely anything that serves them in the moment. Never ever believe the word of a conservative. Never.
That’s fun and all, but the office of the President is very weak in Iran. What does the Supreme Leader say?
Idk anything about Iran but it doesn't seem that simple https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/khameneis-presidential-choice-weak-reformer-or-strong-hardliner
The supreme boofhead seems more concerned with revolutionary guard power grabs. Or maybe this guy is a ploy to increase voter turnout for better optics and he's okay with throwing the IRGC a bone.
Would still be nice if this guy won I guess.
Am I... Agreeing? With something an Iranian President said?
If be a lot more sympathetic to Iran if they weren't actively participating in Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
I have a bit more sympathy for the president, since his decisions can all be vetoed by the ayatollah, and he broadly seems to be trying to move Iran in the right direction
You know what they say about broken clocks.
That sounds like a step in the right direction.
Later:
Iranian morality police and religious hardliners call xor the arrest of President Pezeshkian
Edit: I’m leaving it because it’s more amusing that way
By your logic the president can only be arrested if the morality police and religious hardliners disagree. 🤔
lol yeah, it does look that way
I'm on it lads, booking my flight to Tehran now
How about just disband the IRGC?
They're a terrorist organisation.
And roll over for Israel? Very convenient.
Iran agreed to the nuclear deal. America ripped up the agreement.
Trump ripped up the agreement***
When the two major parties have massively different diplomatic policies we have problems like this a lot.
It can also be good sometimes tho like when Jimmy Carter became president and started cracking down on the junta in Argentina and flying out victims and stuff.
Trump ripped up the agreement***
That's true, but also let me just say this.
Whenever the US does something bad, you can't just blame it on the whole US, you have to look at the specific people responsible for it, right? But what about when another country, like Iran, for example, does something bad? Do we say, "Oh well obviously you can't blame Iran in general for it?" Very rarely. Often, people go so far as to not only paint an entire government negatively off a bad action, but to paint and entire culture and people that way, going back even to previous, unrelated governments that governed previous generations, completely different structures doing completely different things. Post-9/11, you saw people painting the entire Muslim world as warlike religious fanatics, even going back to Mideval times. People sometimes fail to make a distinction between the USSR and modern Russia. And likewise in China, I've seen people before trying to argue that China is inherently domineering based on ancient history.
When we're taught history in school, all of our country's decisions are taught with the full context and perspective, we're taught what people were concerned about and why they did it and who were the ones who actually did it, and the conclusion for bad stuff is that it was an unfortunate necessity, or a mistake, or the product of a few bad apples in an otherwise positive project.
You are right, of course, that it was Trump who pulled out of the deal. But I think it's important to understand that that nuance is only really seen from the inside, that from the perspective of Iran, for example, it's just the US being fickle, and that if we expect the world to be understanding of that sort of nuance to our government's actions, it's important to apply the same sort of nuance any time we look at the actions of other countries.
Except that Iran isn't a democracy in practice or really by any stretch of the imagination. Maybe in the 80s, but when a country has a leader with complete and total authority, it really doesn't matter.
We blame Putin for the actions of Russia bc he has supreme authority over Russia. We cannot blame a single president for the same, as 1, they don't have supreme authority in most matters, and 2, unlike Russia the US is actually a representative democracy, whether or not you like the options available.
In essence, I disagree with the premise that this is the norm. It's not only visible from the inside. If people don't care enough to find out, that's a different problem, but in general, diplomatic officials tend to know abt this kind of stuff because it's their job to.
Whether a country is democratic or not doesn't really have anything to do with it. Every country, including non-democratic ones, has different factions and inner workings.
We cannot blame a single president for the same
Is this a typo? You just said that Trump was responsible for pulling out of the Iran deal, which is true, and which he had the power to do unilaterally.
Nuance. Trump did have that power. He did not, by any means, have power over the entirety of US policy. The fact that the Republicans had significant congressional control also gave him, but actually them, more overall power, but still not absolute by any sense of the imagination. Absolutely every country has different factions and inner workings, but in countries where there is a supreme authority, those are by and large null and void. The US does not have any one supreme authority (except money maybe lol)
I'm basically saying that we can only blame the people that had the power and that took the action in question, or, alternatively, the people with power over them.
Absolutely every country has different factions and inner workings, but in countries where there is a supreme authority, those are by and large null and void.
That's not true. Even in dictatorships, the person at the top still has people who they need to keep happy in order to stay in power. Nobody gets to or stays at the top on their own, what happens is that they're supported in that position by whatever interests they represent. If someone comes to power in a military coup, for instance, they have to keep the military happy or they'll get replaced.
More to the point, it's not just about who gets blame or credit for stuff, it's about understanding the mechanics of a system, and the history, and the various material factors and interests that go into decision making.
We do not apply the same generosity of isolating a president from country policy when it comes to Iranian presidents. But leaving Trump aside there are many other instances where America screwed over Iran.
We do for the ayatollahs though, because they are the ones who actually make the decisions, same goes for Russian presidents and CCP general secretaries
America doesn't have a Supreme leader dumbass
... And yet, we isolate the president from the country as if the country did.
That's. The. Point.
*uneducated idiots isolate....
Ftfy
Good for him. A move that is needed.
Can't he just do it? Look at the camera and tell them "STOP IT YOU WEIRDOS"
US presidents are highly constrained in how they can use their power. Why would you expect Iranian presidents to be any different? They have even less power on paper because Iran also has a Supreme Leader.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/