102
submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 47 points 2 years ago

I don't want to sound like a Putinist gigafascist, but I think Ukraine may have more than one problem.

[-] Weedian@hexbear.net 44 points 2 years ago

Their cope cages

Our ingenious improvised protection

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

I prefer "Munitions Stand-Off Fence" but I just call them cope cages normally

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 39 points 2 years ago

They should just do what I did in every game of Command & Conquer

Send every single tank they have out on a Death or Glory strike

Then when the Brotherhood of Nod (Russia[the bad guys]) is busy fighting the tanks, you send an APC holding a single engineer to capture their Mobile Construction Unit and win the game

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago
[-] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

literally Kursk offensive (if it can even be called that)

[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

Well, give it another year or so and it'll get its pejorative nickname

Something like Zelensky's Folly or the Kursk Krunch

[-] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago
[-] copandballtorture@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago

Last week I had one of my libs grinning while talking about how Ukraine has Russia on the ropes after their own "special military operation" into Russian territory.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 years ago

libs continue to live in an alternate reality

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

Libs are delusional

[-] CommCat@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Can't wait for the first F-16 to be shot down by the Russians. Ukraine already lost one, but it supposedly crashed instead of being shot down by the Russians. There is also a high chance that it was shot down by their own air defence lol, either way the air chief was canned instantly.

These US/NATO wunderwaffe are not so wonderful when faced with an equal foe. Their biggest selling points were that they were tested in real world combat, but it's easy to look amazing against much weaker armies. Same thing with all these American mercs who thought it was gonna be another walk in the park like Iraq lol

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 years ago
[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Not only their own air defense, but a patriot missile lol

[-] emiellr@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

The tanks can be as realiable as can be, but ain't nobody can do smth about the air being full of drones...

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 47 points 2 years ago

They suck anywhere that doesn't have infrastructure to support their 65+ ton heavy asses

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago

I was like, "no fucking way", so I looked it up:

it is one of the heaviest tanks in service at nearly 73.6 short tons (66.8 metric tons).

capitaldcolon This motherfucker weighs more than a Ferdinand tank destroyer......... that is one thicc main battle tank...

[-] Judge_Juche@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago

American weight creep. Like the newest Bradleys weight like 30 tons, slightly heavier than a WW2 medium tank and twice as heavy as a BMP (which the Bradley was suppose to be a copy of).

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago

Just like the cars, joke country.

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Does this mean the US will actually try to create Bolo tanks due to sheer hubris?

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Big Gulp Tank

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 years ago

now look at the weight of the NAMER IFV

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] Outdoor_Catgirl@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Namer is basically a main battle tank with people instead of a gun

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

Genius tactical design...

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago

heavier than a T90 if I remember correctly

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

The American on, presumably

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago

They should have sat on them all and used them in the Kursk offensive primarily on roads instead of having them sink in soft soil across Ukrainian fields where they get wrecked by artillery and drones.

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago

Honestly would've been light-years ahead of the strategy they used

[-] YourHomieRobespierre@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

Still love the ~~truck~~ tank!

[-] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

Maybe if they got 32 tanks the tides of war would change

[-] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

Seriously though I don't know why they thought a few dozen Abrams would do anything. The US deployed over 2,000 tanks during Desert Storm and that was basically a skirmish compared to what's going on in Ukraine.

[-] someone@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

My theory is that the NATO MIC is treating the war like a lab experiment. They give Ukraine a handful of export versions of all sorts of different hardware, then see how the Russian military takes them out for their own R&D purposes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] StalinistApologist@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Thats about 64.5161290322580%!

tankie

[-] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

It is time to work on my stormworks tank again (has a tiny turret, light weight)

[-] ahriboy@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Expect that autoloader variant of M1A2 Abrams, AbramsX would lose soon.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
102 points (97.2% liked)

news

24750 readers
518 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS