71
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by hypercracker@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

awooga

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 30 points 3 months ago

it also took away the pockets from her outfit

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Women are not allowed pockets of any sort, whether they be on shirts or pants. Or something.

[-] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago

Women’s clothes are not intended for hiding witchcraft within!

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My chud family member says "women chose to have pocketless clothing because that's what they buy"

This chud is an adult woman who believes in traditionalism, watches Matt Walsh etc. but has a child out of wedlock. The contradictions are endless.

[-] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago

It’s of a similar vein with republicans who want abortion banned but sneak away in the dead of night to have their love child aborted. The disconnect is there and it is fucking real.

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago

My 1.5yr old has more functional pockets in his wardrobe then my wife does.

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 26 points 3 months ago

This is to be expected. AI will model itself after the data that was entered in. And since that data is sexist, racist, misogynistic, and otherwise, the outputs will skew that way too.

This is the most obviously damning reason why AI cannot possibly be useful as it is today.

[-] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 24 points 3 months ago

"We spared no expense" from Jurassic Park but it's training all your LLMs on huge tits anime girls.

[-] hypercracker@hexbear.net 24 points 3 months ago

the cloth stretch marks around the button are SENDING me lmao

[-] CarbonConscious@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago

Just to clarify, they were uncropping a version that was just the top half of the original picture, so the differences were in the part it "reimagined", not changing things that were already there (in what it was given).

Still, obviously, and I cannot stress this enough - yikes.

gigo, garbage in garbage out

[-] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

i really don't understand the comments acting like it AWOOGAfied her, like she says it added "a hint of a bra" but it just looks like an undershirt?? i literally could not tell which image was supposedly the awoogafied AI version without reading the twitter thread. Literally the original is "sexier," the AI deawoogafied her

showed this to my gf and she said the same thing, she thought the color image was the AI one "made sexier"

[-] hypercracker@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

Look at the stretch marks around the button as though her tits about to explode that fastener into outer space

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
71 points (98.6% liked)

technology

23495 readers
285 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS