663
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago

The worst part is, he isn't even American. Imagine if Americans would go into a foreign country and try to influence the elections... Oh wait.

[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Stupid rich people trying to take advantage of 'stupid' poor people.

[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Stupid rich people taking advantage of the flaws in American law enforcement and of the American judiciary system

[-] arscynic@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 hours ago

This immoral prick continues to push my Stoic practise to its limit.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 43 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Though maybe some of the other things Musk was doing were of murky legality, this one is clearly illegal. See 52 U.S.C. 10307(c): “Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register or vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both…” (Emphasis added.)

I mean, if it’s clearly illegal then can we, you know, apply the law?

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago

checks Musk's net worth

....

No.

[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

Can we "eat" him then? Make it a big ol dinner party everyone invited.

[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Putin rubbing his fingers with glee rn. If this doesn't get prosecuted, I know what he'd do.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 63 points 20 hours ago

Put him behind bars for that and I start believing that the government takes this vote seriously.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 19 hours ago

I'm going to lower the bar:

If the government issues any sort of indictment in the next 3 weeks, I'll agree that they are taking it seriously. Even without bail.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 176 points 23 hours ago

Blatantly illegal.

But Biden won't step up and make Garland do his job.

Just throw it on top of the giant piles of reason "not trump" isn't enough to fight fascism.

We need people actually willing and able to fight, best case scenario for Biden is he's only one of those things.

And as president, he's clearly able to direct the DOJ, if he believes he shouldn't be able, that makes him unwilling to fight fascism.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 55 points 22 hours ago

musk is all in. He either goes to prison or trump wins.

I'm sure investigation starts immediately, but it won't get results until after the election.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 9 points 18 hours ago

musk is all in. He either goes to prison or trump wins.

If trump has proven anything, it's that wealthy Republicans can get away with literally anything in this country. Musk isn't going to prison, and I doubt he'll even see a courtroom over this.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 17 hours ago

Seriously... Trump staged a literal insurrection and is the top presidential candidate. They think Musk is going away for some voter bribery?

load more comments (29 replies)
[-] Fluba@lemdro.id 24 points 20 hours ago

Just curious, why do you think Biden has to do anything? There's teams of people in charge of enforcing laws that don't need the president to tell them what to do. A CEO doesn't tell everyone under him what to do. He just expects them to do their job to the best they're able.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago

Because I know who Merrick Garland is and have observed his behavior over the last four years?

It's legit one of the few areas I agree with Biden:

In recent weeks, President Biden has grumbled to aides and advisers that had Garland moved sooner in his investigation into former President Donald Trump’s election interference, a trial may already be underway or even have concluded, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss private matters. That trial still could take place before the election and much of the delay is owed not to Garland but to deliberate resistance put up by the former president and his team.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/09/white-house-frustration-with-garland-grows-00140813

Although I disagree with Biden on his path forward. Rather than replace Garland, his plan is to grumble to aids and adversers that Garland doesn't do what he wants, I believe Biden should have never appointed him in the first, and can offer no plausible explanation for why he hasn't been replaced other Biden is (say it with me) unwilling to fight fascism as hard as it needs to be fought.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 17 points 17 hours ago

What's stopping people from applying to his "lottery" and just not voting Trump?

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

Apparently nothing. I live in PA and want to sign up, but I really don't want Musk to have my email or phone number or home address.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 13 hours ago
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

I feel like that wouldn't get me the million dollars.

[-] Djtecha@lemm.ee 9 points 11 hours ago

I don't think anyone's actually getting a million dollars...

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 14 hours ago

Understandable. I'd greatly consider it (if I didn't already turn in my mail-in ballot, and he offered to California) but the idea alone that I'd be giving my private info to "I am a massive fascist and enabler and funder of them" just so I can grift a grifter.

But the simple fact that even if I could give them what they demanded for payment, they would probably see a disabled, queer, poor person and go "Oh, well, you're one of them so... Face the wall."

I'd rather be a poverty-trapped queer in a red county as I am now, than sell my morals for money. That's what people with the moral backbone of a chocolate eclair do.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

As if he didn't already have them

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Rich people feel like they can do anything they want and usually the law lets them do so. I hope he faces some type of punishment for this.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 89 points 22 hours ago

This is a case where max jail time is needed. 5 years for each bribe.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 31 points 21 hours ago

Served consecutively, not concurrently

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 110 points 23 hours ago

The Supreme Court: “This is fine as long as it remains Republicans only…”

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 85 points 23 hours ago

The best part about this is that unlike a lot of the other illegal shit his PACs are doing, Musk can't separate himself from it and say he wasn't personally involved. He personally handed out the giant check.

If Harris wins, and if her administration actually decides to crack down on this shit, Musk could end up behind bars. I'm not holding my breath, but it's a still a pleasant thought.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 34 points 23 hours ago

The first rally he came out for trump, he flat out said "if trump loses I'm fucked".

It's logical to assume if he's being this blatant because even a little digging would show obvious crimes.

He's already fucked, he has no other option than to double down with blantant shit.

All the more reason to act now, the election is in two weeks, but if looking into this gets a head start to find some shady shit before January...

Well, it's probably all hypothetical, Biden wouldn't have the balls to do anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago

He will claim is was a joke in court.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gargamel@leminal.space 37 points 21 hours ago

I mean, I guess I would take a million dollars from a deluded billionaire, but I would still vote for Harris.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 23 points 20 hours ago

None of the people they are trying to bribe will see money.

[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

You can't buy popularity, Elon. Ask your buddy Donald

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

You really want him to ask his buddy who took his popularity from a reality show and parlayed it into the Presidency , and might just do it again?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago

Elon Musk and promising people money you'll never actually pay out. Name a more iconic duo

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 66 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Donald Trump, such a great candidate that you have to pay people and offer them cash prizes to get people to vote for him...

That's the message here.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 42 points 23 hours ago

... shall be fined not more than $10,000 ...

Pocket change.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 6 points 16 hours ago

“Illegal” is just a joke at this point

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
663 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19077 readers
3418 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS