1052
Tiger Predators (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 166 points 1 month ago
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 71 points 1 month ago

This is the correct answer. Why are they so violent?

[-] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 122 points 1 month ago

They've been bullied and fat-shamed their whole lives and they've had enough.

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Incel hippos are jealous of good looking tigers getting laid

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago

To make sure the tigers don't start getting any ideas

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago

Herbivores have nothing to lose when hands need to be thrown.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

I just imagined a hippo with hands. Nightmare.

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

You're not imagining. They're real.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] geogle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Not even on the same continent. Hippos are in Africa and Tigers are in Asia. Pretty big desert in between

[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

The Indian ocean isn't a desert

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 117 points 1 month ago
[-] Mango@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah, predators get excited when you turn around and start moving away. These eyes are just asking "what are you doing step bro?".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 67 points 1 month ago
[-] LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Tigers with horns 😨😨 ?

[-] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago
[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago

Wait until you learn about what dolphins sometimes do to their prey

[-] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Something respectful &/or cute I am sure

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

They boop them with their snoot.

[-] TOModera@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

Probably humans, given they went from 100k to 5.6k in population in 100 years and are still in decline.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

That's not long enough to evolve something like this, though.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 month ago
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

in the Ganges Delta in India, where tigers living under protection in a reserve had been killing about 60 people a year.

Geez that's a lot.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 26 points 1 month ago

I mean, deer kill about 400 people a year in the US and they aren't even trying. 280 million people live in the Delta alongside a predator that is actually trying to kill them, so it mkaes sense.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

There's also a fuckton of deer and they're dumb as fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

I learned this from Calvin & Hobbes

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

Their predators are other tigers. There are tribes in Asia who wear masks on the backs of their heads with large eyes to deter tiger attacks. Apparently the tiger is very much about stabbing you in the back, and not so big on open confrontation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BLAMM@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Tigers are only CR4. There's lots of stuff more dangerous that that.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Yeah, you think you’re hot shit as a tiger and then here comes a Hellwasp…

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Or feline AIDS. Can’t fool that with fake eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Fun fact the South American short face bear is the only Ice aged giant that is thought not to be driven extinct by humans and fact humans could not hunt it, Tigers would be a pleasant snack for them.

[-] Towwebbed@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Well that begs the question what the hell drove the short face bear to extinction? The long face bear?

[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Same thing that killed the humans, climate change.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 18 points 1 month ago

Wild tigers, as apex predators, have few natural threats. Their primary competitors include Asiatic wild dogs (dholes), which can harass tigers in packs.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

my new head canon is that tigers are so fed up with asiatic wild dogs that they started calling them d holes

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I've heard of A-holes and B-holes, but the existence of D-holes and the implied C-holes is news to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pinkystew@reddthat.com 18 points 1 month ago

No living thing has a feature "to" do anything. That implies decision making, which is intelligent design.

Tigers have spots on their ears, which can confuse attackers.

Tigers did not develop those spots "to" confuse attackers.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hear what you're saying, and you're 100% correct, but I think most people will realize it's a figure of speech, and easier to say than "Via the process of gene mutation trial and error over many, many generations of tigers, spots have developed on their ears that look like eyes, resulting in predation from behind being discourged."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homura1650@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

All models are wrong, but some are useful. Thinking of evolved features as having a purpose is wrong, but it is also incredibly useful.

Why do we have eyes? In some sense, there is no reason, just a sequence of random coincidences, combined with a slightly non-randon bias refered to as "survival of the fittest" (itself an incorrect model).

However, saying that we have eyes to see has incredible explanatory power, which makes it a useful model. Just like Newton's law of Universal gravity. We've known it that is wrong for a century at this point, but most of the time still talk as if it's true, because it is useful.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, they did though. That's the purpose of this evolutionary trait. I see what you're getting at, but you seem to be implying this was a concidence

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Joe Exotic?

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 11 points 1 month ago

Other tigers?

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Well, they are kind of solitary animals. No one will warn them about something big getting close from behind.

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Do they have them when they are little too? Or maybe it worked out that it was less likely predators would yoink their babies because it seemed like they were always watching. Can't sneak up on someone with eyes on the back of their heads, that never close, even while sleeping.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
1052 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

11479 readers
884 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS