85
So they voted for the guy who's stated goals of adding high tariffs to all imports and doing mass deportations of workers necessary to the agriculture industry will fuck the economy royally. Yeah, that makes sense.
It took me a long time to figure this out.
Trump lies with every breath. Even his supporters don't believe the literal truth of his words. They instead replace the literal meaning of his words, with the more broad idea that he's talking about the thing they like, in a way other politicians don't. That nebulous ephemeral feeling is what they are voting for.
Of course they can't understand that, let alone express it coherently. Which is why all their reasons are such incoherent straw-grasping.
And it literally happens right here on lemmy: https://lemm.ee/post/46717894/16004361
To be fair, he said he would fix the elections not remove them. Lots of nice places like Russia and Belarus have elections without all anxiety of not knowing the results beforehand /s
I was trying to find the clip where the q-nut finds ex-president Garrison in the grocery store and tells him he knows what he's really saying, but Garrison just calls him a crazy son of a bitch; but I couldn't find it.
This one is clear enough though.
Makes no sense at all. Every time a GOPer is in power it has adverse effects on the economy. Every damn time!
Right? Democratic administrations have done better in almost every case for the last 75 years!
For well over a decade economists and other social scientists have documented a strong advantage in economic performance during Democratic administrations. A new Economic Policy Institute report updates this work to the latest data available and confirms that this Democratic advantage persists. Positive indicators like growth in gross domestic product (GDP), income, and wages are faster, while negative indicators like unemployment, inflation, and interest rates are lower. Further, the fruits of economic growth are distributed substantially more equally under Democratic presidents.
The only reason they haven't done even better than that is 80% of their time in office is busy fixing the last Republican fuckup before the public gets a chance to go and elect more Republicans again
Every single person who voted for trump because of the economy is an idiot and a monster. Across the board.
If they're an idiot who doesn't know, they aren't a monster, but a victim of a con.
It's the people who DO know because they aren't idiot's, that are the monsters.
It might seem pedantic. But it really is an important distinction.
Agreed. Everyone who voted for Trump is either an idiot or a monster. I think most of them fall into the former category. Every Trump voter I've talked to who has said they "did their own research" to inform their vote has pointed to information they got from fringe sites and outlets they were initially linked to via social media. Not one mentioned looking at Trump's campaign website, the Wikipedia article on him, much less any of the critical articles about him in legitimate news sites. These are ignorant people with no critical thinking skills.
It is your responsibility to be an informed voter. Stop infantilizing adults who should know better.
There's no one con that'll get everyone.
But everyone can be gotten by at least one con.
"Surely the leopards won't eat my face"
- These guys probably
They're voting for Trump because they've vaguely heard he's a good businessman (From who? Who possibly could be the source of this reputation?). It's just voting based on the general feeling of hearing the words "good businessman" and "better for the economy" alongside Trump.
The logic is more like, "I like leopards, I like to eat, and I like my face. I know who I'm voting for."
I actually laughed when I read the headline for this reason.
Well, Trump is going to solve that problem for them when he puts them in the camps.
Horrible.
They legitimately want Trump to deport the other illegals, not their illegals.
Artemio Muniz, chairman of the Federation of Hispanic Republicans, said he was pleased with the election outcome, but his elation was tempered because “the reality is there’s work to do."
"Now my focus is to the immigration side. Now we have a real battle on our hands, not with Trump," Muniz said, but "we have to make sure ... hard-working Mexican immigrants do not get deported."
Fucking incredible.
I just really have no words or thoughts for how one brain can possess both of these thoughts simultaneously
Well good for those Latino American... because they are no longer part of Americans economy.
Can we keep the Latinas?
I have a Mexican coworker who voted for Trump over a single issue: he believes Trump pulled the FBI and CIA out of Mexico, which stopped them selling guns to the cartels.
Not only is this not true, it shows that he's voting for Trump solely for the benefit of Mexico. Honestly, to my mind, that's not a bad reason to deport someone (which—as a citizen—he can't be, I know).
Leave the place you were born for a better life. Then proceed to vote for the same policies, regulations, and laws that made it a shithole.
Fine, now I’ll only call them Latinx from now on (going to pronounce it latinks)
Todos los traidores
Well thankfully trump WILL SOLVE that because they will have a new top issue...
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
85 points (93.8% liked)
News
23397 readers
1707 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS