347
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

A recall that 99% won't be claimed since if you are buying butter you know it contains milk. Gotta be real dumb to think the butter is milk free.

[-] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 44 points 1 week ago

You do realize we're talking about the same society that requires a warning label to not eat the shampoo?

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

What?! You can eat the shampoo? No dog food for Victor tonight!

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 12 points 1 week ago

It's the same society that just elected a fascist dictator-wannabe. No matter how many intelligent people you know, there's enough to do that.

Maybe warning labels were a mistake...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Backlog3231@reddthat.com 27 points 1 week ago

It isn't about people not knowing butter has milk, its about enforcing the law so they don't "accidentally" leave off legally required information.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Gotta be real dumb

Well based on last Tuesday, this is a shockingly large number of people.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

They’ll just put a sticker on it that says “contains milk”. This is like one of those Tesla recalls that is really just a software update done to meet federal or state requirements.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scytale@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

The US is the most litigious country in the world. They’re likely making sure all bases are covered just in case.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Gotta be real dumb to think the butter is milk free.

So like 50% of people then?

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

This is America.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jakwithoutac@feddit.uk 28 points 1 week ago

ITT: lots of people wondering why this is an issue at all when obviously butter contains milk.

It’s because the company can effectively print whatever they like for the name of the product with no regard to the actual ingredients. A consumer needs to know what they’re actually buying because of things like allergies and intolerances.

In this case, and depending on the severity of the allergy, that missing ingredient warning could cause someone a bad case of the farts or something as serious as anaphylactic shock.

This being said, I’d still agree that people not wanting to consume milk should stick to products with positive confirmation that it is milk-free.

[-] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 2 points 1 week ago

It’s because the company can effectively print whatever they like for the name of the product with no regard to the actual ingredients.

That is not true at all. There are laws that determine what you can actually put on your products, especially on food.

Yes. And Costco (inadvertently) broke them here. Hence the recall.

That was the point. If we let companies ignore the law when it "should be obvious", that gives them a lot of wiggle room to really fuck us over. And nobody wants that

[-] jakwithoutac@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago

Ok fine, yes you are correct in that you can’t advertise a packet of staples as a frozen turkey crown, but you’re also arguing about a different scope. Apologies for speaking like a human on lemmy and not some sort of weird internet law robot.

This is a demonstration of what I’m talking about. To save you the click, this pack of ‘deli fresh’ turkey breast makes no mention of the cornstarch, dextrose or vinegar listed on the ingredients label. ‘Deli fresh’ is itself artistic license, as the product is packaged in plastic and not being served fresh from a deli.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

I understand the "slippery slope" issue but what an insane waste of food just over liability and pointing out the obvious.

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It's not as bad as you think. Grocery stores will just send it back to the manufacturer and re-sticker it.

[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

What a waste of fuel and cause of extra pollutants for nothing

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] x00z@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

What about putting a sticker over it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 18 points 1 week ago

The recall is redundant, it should just be a notice that butter contains milk, and stickers for any leftover inventory.

Collecting it and destroying it like it's poison is silly. If your allergic to milk, you probably should not be buying butter.

[-] jdw@links.mayhem.academy 11 points 1 week ago

There’s an enforcement component. It’s designed to punish the producer so it hurts so it won’t do it again.

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yup. If you are sensitive to a food product you should be aware already of basic products that by definition contain them. Like telling me yogurt is dairy based.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

I'll start the bidding for 24lb at $0.10/lb

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

lol, right! I’ll take all of it for pennie’s.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Weird, is there a crackdown on this sort of thing or did someone really mess up big? I was actually called by my foodstore today to let me know that liptons French onion soup mix was recalled because it didn't list that it has egg in it and my records show that I had purchased this. I don't know if I ever saw this kind of recall before let alone twice in the same day.

[-] frankspurplewings@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I subscribed to FSIS updates and this happens pretty often. Allergen labels are taken pretty seriously. And they send out notifications when they come across one. 🤷🏼‍♀️

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

You have an intimate relationship with your grocer.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Automated message based off rewards card info. Still it's the first time I ever got that and thought it was odd. At least you get something for giving away all your info to everyone.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

80,000 pounds is slightly over two tractor trailers' worth. For the whole country, that's not a big deal.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And that small batch had a label with a different list of ingredients/allergens somehow? I'm curious how that happened.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Printer stopped working, or it got misaligned to the paper, and just the allergen message was cut off. Perhaps.

[-] C126@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Since we're on the topic: do people refrigerate their butter? Those who do, what's your process for getting it on toast smoothly?

[-] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

A type 1 phaser set to the lowest stun setting will melt butter patties if you just flash it on and off quickly.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Oh! Lowest setting! That explains what happened...

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Butter is tasty but annoying, so I switched to those butter-vegetable oil hybrids.

They taste a bit like butter but spread like margarine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

I refrigerate my butter and don't make toast very often. When I do make toast, I cut off the appropriate amount of butter and place it on the warm toast and let it sit to acclimate. After a moment, I spread it with a knife.

No, the spread is not amazing and creamy. It is still a little cold and chunky. But I don't care leaving your butter out is weird.

[-] Rutty@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Join the butter dish supremacy. I promise, you’ll like your life more

[-] Jackinopolis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Also use the salted butter to leave out. It keeps better and tastes better too.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Salted can be left out but not unsalted. I buy salted anyway, and it comes 4 bars to a pack, so I'll take out a bar, cut it in half, put half back in the fridge and leave half in a butter dish, replace as needed.

[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yup, keep it in the fridge. I just slice it up into thin patties while I wait for the toast to finish then I put it on the hot toast and it melts quickly.

The problem is when they bring out room temp toast and ice cold patties in restaurants. One thing I do is knead the patties in their wrappers a bit to soften them up.

[-] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

If I'm desperate I'll microwave it on 20% for 20 seconds or so. But these days I always leave a bit out.

Salted butter stays good for longer when unrefrigerated

[-] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes. Take an appropriate chunk for your needs and nuke it for 5 seconds.

[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I don't really eat toast. If it's on popcorn I'll melt it then pour it on, but that makes the popcorn soggy. I need to find a better solution for popcorn tbh

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Most people aren't going to bring the butter back in.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
347 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

12348 readers
807 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS