75
submitted 4 days ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Seasonal_Peace@hexbear.net 42 points 4 days ago

Sell it to whom, Ben? Another fucking private data hoarder? The problem isn’t just who owns Chrome, it’s the product itself and the way it’s designed to centralize control and exploit user data. Breaking it up or making it public would be the only way to fix this mess.

[-] iByteABit@hexbear.net 29 points 4 days ago

Waiting until it's coincidentally sold to a company indirectly funded by Google

[-] footfaults@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

Mozilla lol

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago
[-] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 24 points 4 days ago

Trump's DOJ probably reverses this request in 30 seconds. I doubt this happens within two months.

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

Except Google search is already dead in the water to LLM-powered search, so crippling Google empowers Peter Thiel

[-] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I actually looked up an archive link. Trump's first DOJ started this lawsuit, so potentially this could actually happen.

I do think that Google is so uniquely powerful that selling off Chrome to someone else is a net positive. It won't make Google search lose its status as top search engine for a while.

Stripping Chrome for parts would be better, but this is significant.

https://archive.is/bBDQt

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Good thing about Trump and his government last time was that he inadvertently went after the right people because he got into a personal spat against "the algorithms" (which they might as well use echo braces on at this point).

It's the same reason he took the piss out of Elon the first time he was offered his account back on Twitter. But just like that, there's a chance he turns face the moment he's scared Google a little bit.

[-] footfaults@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

I wonder though. The right wing thinks tech companies "shadowban" them so maybe they let it go through?

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)

news

23564 readers
683 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS