101
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The Supreme Clerics of America divine truth from our holy text, it's says, be more racist.

[-] footfaults@hexbear.net 17 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Cuomo in NY during COVID forced the production of hand sanitizer by ~~slave~~prison labor and Gruesome Newsom forces ~~slave~~prison labor to fight forest fires so you know what, maybe the 14th amendment kind of sucks because it lets everyone pretend that slavery did get abolished and it's a "solved problem"

So yeah you know what fuck it, let the fascists rule that a constitutional amendment is unconstitutional and blow up the Constitution through a paradox (how can the constitution itself be unconstitutional?)

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago

Dogma (1999)

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 38 points 6 hours ago

Pretty sure she's just saying an originalist would have to oppose the existence of West Virginia to be ideologically consistent. Expecting any American politician to have an ideology is lib shit though

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 8 points 3 hours ago

How long until she declares the Louisiana Purchase unconstitutional at this rate? sicko-intrigued

[-] _pi@lemmy.ml 28 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yeah Antonin Scalia was a textualist until he wasn't, until he was again, until he wasn't.

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 13 points 3 hours ago

Every "originalist"/"textualist" is this way. It's an inherently dishonest position based entirely on finding any excuse to push reaction through the judiciary.

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 36 points 5 hours ago

claims to be an originalist

does judicial review

very-intelligent

[-] _pi@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 hours ago

Listen everything Scalia wrote was ideologically consistent because it used the same verbiage as Bush V Gore, "limited to present circumstances".

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 16 points 3 hours ago

ah, a personal favorite,

this ruling sets no precedent because I decided it doesn't

The kind of thing produced by a very real and legitimate court system and definitely not just 9 unaccountable, unelected elders making decisions on a whim.

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 4 points 1 hour ago

But remember, we can't stack the court with 50 zoomer maoists because people would "lose faith" in the "institutions".

[-] edge@hexbear.net 12 points 4 hours ago

until he wasn't

crab-party

[-] edge@hexbear.net 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I don't really see why. Multiple states had previously been split from existing states without controversy (including Kentucky also split from Virginia). All that's required is the approval of the state legislature and Congress. The Virginia state legislature as recognized by Congress and the President voted to allow the counties of West Virginia to leave and form their own state. Congress and the President approved.

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 23 points 5 hours ago

49 state flag vendors salivating

[-] OperationOgre@hexbear.net 13 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognize Missourah

[-] regul@hexbear.net 15 points 5 hours ago

They haven't been this horned up since the 248 days before the admission of Hawaii in 1959.

[-] YoungSheldonAdelson@hexbear.net 41 points 6 hours ago

If I were a us supreme court justice in 2024 I would be pretty careful when throwing around words like ‘illegitimate.’

[-] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 27 points 6 hours ago
[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 11 points 5 hours ago
[-] footfaults@hexbear.net 7 points 4 hours ago

rocz-yes Maybury v. Madison was wrongly decided

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 51 points 6 hours ago

I'd posit that the entirety of the US is illegitimate, but it is amusing that people who believe in adhering to every single letter in a document authored 250 years ago are taken remotely seriously

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago

the arguably unconstitutional United States of America

[-] urmums401k@hexbear.net 17 points 6 hours ago

Yes but if your entire intelligence plusca few high end gpu's are turned to the task of justifying whatever you currently feel, and that is the entire purpose of everything in the world, then you can totally pick and choose.

They really are brilliantly stupid, and I mean it when I say that.

[-] Zoift@hexbear.net 12 points 5 hours ago

This is the medium domino in the chain that leads to the full cardinality of Virginia.

[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 10 points 4 hours ago

"western virginia" breaks the meter of Country Roads sadness

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago

"West Makaha" doesn't and that version's better anyway israel-cool

[-] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 47 points 7 hours ago

How tf is an amendment illegitimate? It’s an amendment. It amends the constitution

[-] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 26 points 6 hours ago

I’m going to introduce an amendment to the constitution that reads, “this amendment is unconstitutional”. Boom. Instant constitutional crisis.

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 10 points 5 hours ago

paradoxical constitutional shenanigans let's goooo

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 19 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

lonk: https://www.valleydude70.com/blog-1/2020/9/29/amy-comey-barrett-and-the-fourteenth-amendment

If they claim the 14th is illegitimate but make no such claim about the 13th and 15th, it's just what @urmums401k said. If they claim all 3 are illegitimate they're a fucking confederate sympathizer and should be tarred and feathered as such

[-] context@hexbear.net 7 points 4 hours ago

no this is great because if original popular sovereignty is the basis of legitimacy then she's definitely endorsing the idea that the united states itself is completely illegitimate. the constitution was imposed on the american people without the support of the necessary supermajority of those same people, since a supermajority of them were explicitly denied enfranchisement by that very constitution.

[-] urmums401k@hexbear.net 28 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yes but see its inconvenient for me, so, you know.

Illegitimate.

[-] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 28 points 6 hours ago

Yeah buddy sure. You vs a Supreme Court justice. Who am I supposed to believe?

[-] coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net 14 points 6 hours ago
[-] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 19 points 6 hours ago

President Xi, the people of western Virginia yearn for freedom

[-] coeliacmccarthy@hexbear.net 12 points 6 hours ago

West Virginiastan Independence Movement

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 6 points 5 hours ago

Please provide a link to the source of this

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
101 points (100.0% liked)

news

23567 readers
920 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS