154
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 72 points 2 weeks ago

actually hilarious that the navy saw a radar signature for a fighter jet whilst off the coast of Yemen and decided "yep that's definitely a hostile target" actual smoothbrain navy.

Don't F-18s have IFF too? Fuck sake lmao

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago

All I'm saying is if you have a Yemeni drone following behind an F/A-18F on takeoff or landing, and an infrared heat seeking missile (SM-2 or SM-3) is fired at the drone, the F/A-18F's two jet engines have a much larger heat signature than the drone which makes for a juicy target, and the rest is history (for the F/A-18F).

[-] Outdoor_Catgirl@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

I don't believe that amerikkkan ships have IR SAMs, just radar.

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

SM-2MR Block IIIB and SM-3 have terminal IR guidance. Also terminal active radar homing will just lock onto anything in it's view, the missiles won't have the IFF codes onboard. Only using semi active homing will be missiles be guided using a radar connected to the IFF system.

[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago
[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you add the quote from Mohammed Ali al-Houthi from earlier this year, it definitely suits the emote:

The heroes in the Yemeni armed forces know about the loopholes that can be exploited by synchronizing the take-off or landing of American aircraft on the ships. I advise the American and its allies to issue a decision not to take off at all.

He even told the US how they would accomplish this, warned them in advance, and then went out and did it. F/A-18F down.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah this is definitely 5D chess then lmao

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago

possible. I'm going off the assumption that it was using SARH which would easily differentiate between such targets BUT the SM-3 also has a passive infrared seeker so my theory is moot.

Also, just before posting this Houthis have claimed they shot it down lmao.

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Also, just before posting this Houthis have claimed they shot it down lmao.

If you read the statement , it states: "Shooting down an F-18 aircraft while the destroyers were trying to confront the Yemeni drones and missiles." In that context it reads, to me at least, as if the Yemeni Armed Forces engineered a situation which caused the US to shoot down their own plane. A valid and impressive tactic, a loss is a loss no matter what or who fires the shot.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. I think the translation to English is probably goofy

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

My air force buddy says that sometimes F-18 pilots will try to "nudge" cruise missiles to divert them, so it's possible that both of these are nudges gone wrong. It's also possible that I'm the heat of the moment, the pilots were attempting a nudge while the destroyer was firing anti missile shots and hit them

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 28 points 2 weeks ago

Don't F-18s have IFF too?

Not only that, but all military aircraft are outfitted with an enhanced version of IFF that includes an encrypted challenge/response that uses a rotating series of codes. IFF codes are loaded as part of preflight checks, so either they ignored it, or somebody really fucked up.

[-] Self_Sealing_Stem_Bolt@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

Its because Yemen shot it down. This is how amerika launders its losses.

[-] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

Either outcome is hilairous

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

Even better, the US shot it down because the missile locked onto a Yemeni drone that lured it right into the F-18's exhaust. Fucking incredible.

[-] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Seriously L M A O

Houthis, well known for their fighter pilots

Either that or they seriously thought Russia/Iran were gonna just send fighter aircraft at an American cruiser which...L M A O

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 51 points 2 weeks ago

Holy shit, it's the ghost of Kiev

[-] Lawn_and_disorder@hexbear.net 45 points 2 weeks ago

Critical support for US navy, not something I thought I would say..

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 71 points 2 weeks ago

someone on telegram congratulated the US armed forces for shooting down their first terrorist.

[-] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago

oh fuck, that would be devastating if any of the swabbies could read

[-] duderium@hexbear.net 42 points 2 weeks ago

They’re lying. It was Ansarallah.

[-] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

It's a classic strategy, make a lie embarrassing enough and almost no one will question it

If you ever really need to get out of something, saying that you shit your pants will almost always work

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Her: My dad says he found you masturbating noisily in the garden shed in the middle of the night.

/pops Mentos

Me: I had really bad diarrhea and was dehydrated.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 38 points 2 weeks ago
[-] chungusamonugs@hexbear.net 35 points 2 weeks ago

Is John McCain back from the dead??

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

Does Ansar Allah even have fighter jets?

[-] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes, mostly Su-22 and a few F5. They also have a bunch of transport and attack helis.

These were used to bpmb the Pro-Saudi goverment and Islamist groups.

[-] TomBombadil@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

I heard somewhere they had one... F5

[-] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 24 points 2 weeks ago

"Damn, those terrorists are getting more sophisticated all the time! Now their drones can mimic the exact signature of our F-18s!" scared

[-] Cuervo@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago

still not a great environmental impact but this is a better way of using ammo to keep the MIC happy

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
154 points (100.0% liked)

news

23678 readers
735 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS